Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Won't Declassify 28 Pages of Intelligence Report on Saudi Involvement
Associated Press ^ | July 29, 2003 | Ken Guggenheim

Posted on 07/29/2003 1:47:06 PM PDT by New Horizon

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush refused on Tuesday to declassify 28 pages of a congressional report on possible links between Saudi government officials and the Sept. 11 hijackers, saying that "would help the enemy" by revealing intelligence sources and methods. Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal called suggestions of such links "an outrage to any sense of fairness" and said his country had been "wrongfully and morbidly accused of complicity in the attacks."

"Twenty-eight blank pages are now considered substantial evidence to proclaim the guilt of a country that has been a true friend and partner of the United States for over 60 years," the foreign minister said.

The Saudis have complained that they cannot respond to a report they cannot see. But Bush made plain he has no intention of declassifying the material.

"I absolutely have no qualms at all, because there's an ongoing investigation into the 9-11 attacks, and we don't want to compromise that investigation," Bush said at a news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in the Rose Garden.

"If people are being investigated, it doesn't make sense for us to let them know who they are," Bush told reporters before meeting with al-Faisal.

Moreover, Bush said, "declassification of that part of a 900-page document would reveal sources and methods that would make it harder for us to win the war on terror. ... It would help the enemy if they knew our sources and methods."

The top Republican senator on the 9-11 inquiry, Richard Shelby, said Sunday that 95 percent of the classified pages could be released without jeopardizing national security. Bush ignored a reporter's question Tuesday on Shelby's assessment.

But he did leave the door open to declassifying portions of the report at some point.

"Perhaps at some point in time, down the road, after the investigations are fully complete, and if it doesn't jeopardize our national security, perhaps we can declassify" the material, he said.

The dispute centers on 28 pages of redacted material in the congressional panel's report. The information is widely believed to center on Saudi Arabia, birthplace of Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers. Saudi Arabia has vehemently denied supporting the hijackers.

The Saudi government, some members of Congress and at least two presidential candidates have sought declassification of the section.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., during a campaign stop Tuesday, called on Bush to make public the section at issue. Kerry said his proposal was timed to coincide with the president's meetings with Saudi officials in Washington, which he said provide an opportunity "to make the record clear."

Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., a presidential candidate and the co-chairman of a congressional committee investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, also called for declassification.

Graham had said that releasing the report would "permit the Saudi government to deal with any questions which may be raised in the currently censored pages, and allow the American people to make their own judgment about who are our true friends and allies in the war on terrorism." Graham made the request in a Monday letter to Bush.

But White House spokesman Scott McClellan said that "The material included in that section in question contains information about ongoing investigations, counterterrorism operations and sensitive sources and methods."

After the report was released last Thursday, Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan issued a statement saying that "28 blanked-out pages are being used by some to malign our country and our people."

"Saudi Arabia has nothing to hide. We can deal with questions in public, but we cannot respond to blank pages," he said.

House and Senate members released the full, 850-page report finding a series of errors and miscommunications kept U.S. authorities from pursuing clues before the attacks. The 28-page section dealing with "sensitive national security matters" was almost entirely redacted.

AP-ES-07-29-03 1633EDT


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; bush; declassify; saudi; saudiarabia; terror

1 posted on 07/29/2003 1:47:07 PM PDT by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., a presidential candidate and the co-chairman of a congressional committee investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, also called for declassification.

5...4...3...
(Countdown until Graham's next call for President Bush's impeachment).

2 posted on 07/29/2003 1:50:48 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC (Hippies. They want to save the earth, but all they do is smoke dope and smell bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
Watched as crocodile tears spilled from his eyes.

Lying sack of......Wahabis all of them...
3 posted on 07/29/2003 1:51:06 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
I bet the French are also mentioned in the report, and the Germans, and the Russians and the UN....
4 posted on 07/29/2003 1:56:45 PM PDT by sarasmom (Hey France...tick tick to.. (I am the new oracle..See Afghanistan and Iraq in my resume))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
The information is widely believed to center on Saudi Arabia, birthplace of Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 hijackers.

15 out of 19 adds up to a batting average of .789, which leads the league by a wide margin. I'd boycott the Saudis were it not for the fact that they don't actually make or grow anything. If they weren't sitting on the biggest oilfield in the world, they'd be every bit as wealthy as the Palestinians.

5 posted on 07/29/2003 2:00:26 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
Who leaked to the Saudi's what was in the 28 pages? Who met with a Saudi prince last week? Who in the Senate is a danger to the Security of the United States by sitting on Armed Services? What duo is out to undermine the credibility of the Bush Administration?

Would bet that the name Clinton is the answer to all the questions you get 100! Whenever Bill meets with a foreign leader, the next thing you know the Bush Administration is in the crosshairs of that leader. Just what kind of lies/spin are the Clintons peddling?
6 posted on 07/29/2003 2:44:30 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Who leaked to the Saudi's what was in the 28 pages? Who met with a Saudi prince last week?

To add to that: its not like the Saudis probably can't get their hands on this report if they really wanted to try. They've probably already seen it and can respond to some of the charges. Of course they can't respond to all of them as they are guilty of letting this problem fester in their country, and might of had a hand in it.

So we have to now classify the document as it'll make our intelligence appear flawed, and we probably pointed the finger at some other partners (French, Germans, etc) that will probably throw a hissy fit if they read it. Yada yada yada.
7 posted on 07/29/2003 3:10:17 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
I love this, Bush has them all so flummoxed, soon they'll all be crying out to have this information released and guess what.............He will!

Then suddenly it will be a different story.
8 posted on 07/29/2003 3:12:44 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
The Saudi government, some members of Congress and at least two presidential candidates have sought declassification of the section.

Good to know who is with the enemy and who is with the USA.

If the press wants a President that will jeopardize national security, they will just have to get a Democrat elected.

9 posted on 07/29/2003 3:16:55 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Convicted felons for Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Horizon
Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal called suggestions of such links "an outrage to any sense of fairness" and said his country had been "wrongfully and morbidly accused of complicity in the attacks."


If you stopped funding terroist maybe your complaint would carry a bit more weight. Until then don't go away mad...just go away.
10 posted on 07/29/2003 8:29:26 PM PDT by Valin (America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
If you want to know, then check out these links. I hope these links shed some light on the 'Rats and the Establishment Republicans" ... that ARE our Enemies ~ Domestic.
11 posted on 07/30/2014 9:03:56 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson