Skip to comments.
NBC: Handling of Sons “Quite Offensive
to Islamic Sensibilities”
MRC ^
| Monday July 28, 2003
| BrentBaker
Posted on 07/28/2003 10:54:17 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
NBCs Richard Engel offered a more sweeping scolding than did other reporters of the U.S. for laying out for video cameras the bodies of Uday and Qusay Hussein. He called the decision controversial and insisted all of this has been quite offensive to Islamic sensibilities here. Muslims are generally buried in a simple white shroud without any embalming process at all.
On Fridays NBC Nightly News, Tom Brokaw asked Engel in Baghdad: Richard, as you well know, theres fresh video tonight as well of the bodies of Saddams two sons after they were cleaned up by Army morticians. We want to warn everybody, the images are still very graphic, but are those new images any more persuasive to the Iraqi people?
Richard suggested the U.S. messed up again: They are not really more persuasive. But they certainly are more controversial. These bodies were quite radically altered. First, the men were shaved, then putty was used to remodel their faces, make-up was also applied to make them look more life-like. The Americans, however, say these are certainly the men and even displayed a metal plate that bears the identical serial number to a plate that was inserted in Udays leg after an assassination attempt in the 1990s. All of this has been quite offensive to Islamic sensibilities here. Muslims are generally buried in a simple white shroud without any embalming process at all, Tom.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; bodies; iraq; islam; mrc; nbc; qusayhussein; uday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-200 next last
To: Alouette
Oh yeah, I should add...
Sandmaggots don't
have sensibitities.
So how can this post make sense?
61
posted on
07/28/2003 11:18:52 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
To: Terriergal
LOL!! Never saw that one before.
62
posted on
07/28/2003 11:19:10 AM PDT
by
mafree
To: fight_truth_decay
I find most Islamic handling of non Moslems to be offensive.
To: isthisnickcool
Secondly, it is Haraam for strange males and females to see the face of the opposite gender even though after the person has passed away. Totally wacky. Do they think it'd be a turn on or something? Maybe they do.
How the heck do they handle women's physical exams, I'd have to wonder. What kind of topsy turvy thinking goes on here? Maybe you can look at the rest of the body but not the face?
64
posted on
07/28/2003 11:20:15 AM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: fight_truth_decay
NBC: Handling of Sons Quite Offensive to Islamic Sensibilities
roflmao...
this is FANTASTIC news!
these murderous "religion of pieces" cult members need to be REALLY offended. the more the merrier in my book.
To: fight_truth_decay
I agree. Photographing their bodies was offensive.
They should have been properly hanged from a minaret at the Grand Mosque in Baghdad and left for the crows.
66
posted on
07/28/2003 11:20:30 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: mafree
:-)
67
posted on
07/28/2003 11:20:37 AM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: fight_truth_decay
"We wouldn't be seeing the pictures of Uday and Qusay Hussein if some of the Iraqi whose families were raped, tortured or murdered had gotten hold of them."
My sentiments exactly. The U.S. handling of the bodies was probably more humane than if they'd fallen into the hands of those they'd abused. We more than likely did them a favor.
68
posted on
07/28/2003 11:21:01 AM PDT
by
mass55th
(i)
To: Mo1
I am incensed. ( I know-so what's new? lol, sort of.)
I am off to write to little tommy brokaw right now. I sure wish a few others would do this as well. At least someone on his staff will have to feel the wrath. Think I'll mention the words fair and balanced and give tommy a good old fashioned word lashing.
69
posted on
07/28/2003 11:21:04 AM PDT
by
Republic
To: Terriergal
You guys have some what I would consider appropriate ideas...
Whats sad about it is, that even what we may suggest is still too good for two krappy pieces of. . .well, I dont want to be thrown out of here . .
70
posted on
07/28/2003 11:21:35 AM PDT
by
Roughneck
(Starve the Beast!)
To: fight_truth_decay
We want to warn everybody, the images are still very graphic, but are those new images any more persuasive to the Iraqi people? And I might add that NBC didn't have to air the video .. That was THEIR decision to do so
71
posted on
07/28/2003 11:21:53 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
To: Pest
HMMMM that was exactly what I said days ago when this issue first came up...let's see...they were murdering, whore mongering, drug abusing alcoholics. I guess that will move them right to the front of the line concerning Islamic morals.
72
posted on
07/28/2003 11:21:54 AM PDT
by
CrystalClear
(Sharpton / Dean for 2004 Entertainment!)
To: Eaker; habs4ever; Ditter; shaggy eel; dorben; Son of Rooster; Tennessee_Bob; Cyrano; ...
You guys won't believe this... but then again, maybe you will. :-( It *is* all too common nowadays after all.
73
posted on
07/28/2003 11:22:00 AM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: fight_truth_decay
"Islamic Sensibilities"
It doesn't seem that they have any to begin with, so, who cares?
74
posted on
07/28/2003 11:22:01 AM PDT
by
PatrioticAmerican
(Helping Mexicans invade America is TREASON!)
To: fight_truth_decay
Seems to me the brothers Gruesome loved video. Making video of themselves and others. Watching hours of the many, many videos they, especially Uday, made. You know, the usual stuff - birthdays, weddings, parties, sporting events, torture, murder, rape, killings, gruesome details of each, played for themselves and guests, guests who knew enough to watch and feign enjoyment lest they become subjects of the next installment. And they sometimes randomly became subjects anyway. Oh, how fitting that the brothers became subjects of their 'final' video. Do you suppose they have Sony in hell??
We wouldn't be seeing the pictures of Uday and Qusay Hussein if some of the Iraqi whose families were raped, tortured or murdered had gotten hold of them.
Absolutely!! Plus others are probably afraid to defy the Hussein administration or what's left of it - the Baathists who still crave power, without proof that the leaders of the regime are falling. I'm sure some are skeptical of the photos if they have seen them. Their fear is understandable.
75
posted on
07/28/2003 11:22:03 AM PDT
by
fortunecookie
(longtime lurker and new poster)
To: Roughneck
I feel your pain.
76
posted on
07/28/2003 11:22:37 AM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
Comment #77 Removed by Moderator
To: miloklancy
Dead on!
How about couples holding hands jumping from the WTC?
78
posted on
07/28/2003 11:23:54 AM PDT
by
autoresponder
(PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
To: mass55th
The U.S. handling of the bodies was probably more humane than if they'd fallen into the hands of those they'd abused. Doesn't matter. they won't be happy with ANYTHING we do until we convert to Islam. then we can do whatever the h*ll we want and call it our sacred right.
79
posted on
07/28/2003 11:23:59 AM PDT
by
Terriergal
("multipass!")
To: fortunecookie
Oh, how fitting that the brothers became subjects of their 'final' video. Here they are sporting with their virgins.
80
posted on
07/28/2003 11:24:23 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Every politician should live next door to a pimp, so he can have someone to look up to.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-200 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson