Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC: Handling of Sons “Quite Offensive to Islamic Sensibilities”
MRC ^ | Monday July 28, 2003 | BrentBaker

Posted on 07/28/2003 10:54:17 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay

NBC’s Richard Engel offered a more sweeping scolding than did other reporters of the U.S. for laying out for video cameras the bodies of Uday and Qusay Hussein. He called the decision “controversial” and insisted “all of this has been quite offensive to Islamic sensibilities here. Muslims are generally buried in a simple white shroud without any embalming process at all.”

On Friday’s NBC Nightly News, Tom Brokaw asked Engel in Baghdad: “Richard, as you well know, there’s fresh video tonight as well of the bodies of Saddam’s two sons after they were cleaned up by Army morticians. We want to warn everybody, the images are still very graphic, but are those new images any more persuasive to the Iraqi people?”

Richard suggested the U.S. messed up again: “They are not really more persuasive. But they certainly are more controversial. These bodies were quite radically altered. First, the men were shaved, then putty was used to remodel their faces, make-up was also applied to make them look more life-like. The Americans, however, say these are certainly the men and even displayed a metal plate that bears the identical serial number to a plate that was inserted in Uday’s leg after an assassination attempt in the 1990s. All of this has been quite offensive to Islamic sensibilities here. Muslims are generally buried in a simple white shroud without any embalming process at all, Tom.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; bodies; iraq; islam; mrc; nbc; qusayhussein; uday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-200 next last
To: fight_truth_decay

141 posted on 07/28/2003 12:09:31 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
; )
142 posted on 07/28/2003 12:12:49 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I hope we get "daddy" and show the pictures again and again! Let the whines begin!!
143 posted on 07/28/2003 12:16:28 PM PDT by teletech (Have we dug up Saddam yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Keep remembering that Israeli soldier hanging out the pali office building window about a year or two ago that showed a bloodied, mutiliated body courtesy of being beaten and tortured to death by an islamic crowd. Now, I ask what was that again about offending islamic sensibilities?
144 posted on 07/28/2003 12:17:03 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Islamic sensibilities

Now there's an oxymoron! (Tom and Richard are utter morons).

145 posted on 07/28/2003 12:17:41 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pest
So if they aren't Muslims, how could the treatment of them affect Islamic sensibilities?

They were muslims when it was convenient, like ruling through a terroristic regime. Their thinking was that devout muslims will accept such treatment from another muslim in the name of religion, but not in the name of secularism or whatever. And the Gruesome Threesome understood this and used it to their advantage, much like Lenin & Stalin.

Aren't they just infidels like the rest of us?

Shhh. No one's supposed to know. Actually, they are infidels much worse than the rest of us...

146 posted on 07/28/2003 12:18:07 PM PDT by fortunecookie (longtime lurker and new poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Dropping people into shredders offends my sensibilities.
147 posted on 07/28/2003 12:19:52 PM PDT by Samwise (There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roughneck
Do they use pork gut for suture?

Hope so!!

Then I won't need to send the pigskin blankets??

148 posted on 07/28/2003 12:20:29 PM PDT by fortunecookie (longtime lurker and new poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
"All of this has been quite offensive to Islamic sensibilities here."

Should we cry for them too?
Who effin cares.........
149 posted on 07/28/2003 12:20:44 PM PDT by hunyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
tough sh!t NBC and those offended.

Saddam had plenty of time to comply and was given every opportunity.

Once war starts, as the principal says in Ferris Bueller's Day Off: "Game's Up! You're @ss is mine!"
150 posted on 07/28/2003 12:23:41 PM PDT by jonalvy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Thanks for posting!
151 posted on 07/28/2003 12:25:18 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: 6323cd
He left the Christians pretty much alone. If he'd been Muslim, they would have been butchered and thrown out of the country.
152 posted on 07/28/2003 12:27:23 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
They probably have women doctors for women, and male doctors for men.
153 posted on 07/28/2003 12:32:40 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary; Terriergal
Not really.
In most muslim nations, midwives take care of births. and that's about it.
Specifically under the Taliban, women were 'doctored' by being 'examined' on the other side of a sheet. All that was visible was their mouth, and they had to answer questions.
In other nations, women are denied medical, or given very mediocre or minimal care.

In the most secular nations, there are women doctors for women, but the level of care is still not up to snuff as the funding is not available.
Islam, a religion of P!$$.
154 posted on 07/28/2003 12:35:39 PM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
Where, indeed! the PC folks would go absolutely nutty over that!
155 posted on 07/28/2003 12:37:24 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
Me either, Kelly!
156 posted on 07/28/2003 12:39:34 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Roughneck
Doesn't matter, no 72 virgins in heaven waiting for them; more like 72 demons in hell salivating for their return.
157 posted on 07/28/2003 12:41:04 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
And where is NOW? They protest so much about the way women are treated but they have totally ignored what these women have had to go through. Cowards and hypocrites all. Thanks for the info.
158 posted on 07/28/2003 12:45:34 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
NOW is too busy being gleeful at Democrats raping women, they glory in victimhood.
They want nothing to do with actually making things better for women, they want power and more victims to add to their powerbase.

That's the most basic rub about Islamic medicine and how it treats women. There's alot more info, and alot more detail available. But that is the basic general rule of thumb.
In their eyes, "If it's female, it's not worth having except for having children."
There are few exceptions, but there are some.
But they are few and far between.
159 posted on 07/28/2003 12:48:39 PM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
One wonders if 9/11 or Iraqi mass graves or gang rapes or torture also were 'offensive to Islamic sensibilities'. No, of course not. But if it was, you'd never hear from Brokaw.
160 posted on 07/28/2003 12:54:19 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson