Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay:Dems Reveal True Swinging-70's Selves; Big-govt, Blame-America-First Liberalism Died w/Disco
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=127-07252003 ^

Posted on 07/25/2003 1:15:25 PM PDT by chance33_98

DeLay: Dems Reveal True Swinging-Seventies Selves; Big-government, Blame-America-First Liberalism Died with Disco

7/25/03 3:25:00 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: National Desk

Contact: Stuart Roy or Jonathan Grella, 202-225-4000, both for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay

WASHINGTON, July 25 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) today gave a speech before a crowd of College Republicans at the Capitol Hilton in Washington, DC.

DeLay said the single organizing philosophy of the Democrat party is "an irrational, all-encompassing, broiling hatred of George W. Bush" and that they have decided to either ignore or reject the realities of 21st century life.

Below are excerpts from his speech.

"While everyone else got the memo that big-government, blame-America-first liberalism died with disco, the Howard Dean Democrats still want to party like its 1979. Maybe we should thank the Democrats for shedding their moderate clothing to reveal their true swinging-seventies selves. Frankly America doesn't need a president in a hot-pink leisure suit," DeLay said.

"Just look at their presidential candidates: it's like they're lost in a time warp. They want to tax like Mondale, spend like Carter, and fight like McGovern," DeLay said.

"No responsible leader could have permitted Saddam Hussein to remain in Baghdad, yet the Democrats now spew more rhetoric about President Bush than they ever did about Saddam Hussein," DeLay said.

"Let's be real clear, if you take their comments to their logical conclusion, they're essentially calling our Commander in Chief, Benedict Arnold," DeLay said. "If we are to take this nonsense seriously, that is how out of control the Democrats' rhetoric has become. But you see that's the whole point.

"The Democrats' accusations aren't meant to be taken seriously," DeLay said. "I will never call the Democrat Party unpatriotic, but I will call their current leadership unfit to face the serious challenges of the 21st century."

DeLay has increasingly taken a leadership role in foreign affairs through his work to expand freedom and his articulation of democratic principles. He was a forceful advocate of President Bush's decision to confront Saddam Hussein's aggression. This weekend DeLay will travel to Israel for a week long trip to the Middle East where he will be speaking at the Knesset on U.S.-Israel solidarity.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: dems; liberals; timewarp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Only1choice____Freedom
Said with a French accent no doubt. Like Inspector Clouseau - "Does your duug bite?"

And as the Swiss innkeeper said to your Clouseau question after the dog bites him.

"That is not my dog".

21 posted on 07/25/2003 2:18:08 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
DeLay for POTUS 2008.
22 posted on 07/25/2003 2:22:34 PM PDT by slohand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Tom Delay gives another punishing but honest indictment of the intellectual dishonest Left. The Left is belittling the terrorist threat, giving the people the impression we're losing the fight, and has no agenda of their own. I am serious on the latter. Go to the DNC's website- they have NOTHING on education, NOTHING on social security, NOTHING on taxation. As Delay says, the DNC's entire platform is about "hatred of Bush". That is not a positive, optimistic message for America. Democrats are peddling pessimism and that's not going to cut it.
23 posted on 07/25/2003 2:23:49 PM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Reply #6 referred to Democrats.
24 posted on 07/25/2003 2:24:16 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; Sir Gawain
I have no idea what ruse you're talking about. Honest. Can you please elaborate clearly and simply on what you mean?

Your reply #10, where you all of the sudden castigate Sir Gawain for a personal attack against you that never happened.

But what the hey, feigning indignity, is an old political ploy.

BTW, SG thinks he is a comedian and always makes "contrarian" statements to cause trouble, IMO.

25 posted on 07/25/2003 2:27:13 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dane
and always makes "contrarian" statements to cause trouble, IMO.

Yeah, you've never done THAT...

26 posted on 07/25/2003 2:33:57 PM PDT by zoyd (My nameplate medallion says "Never Trust A HAL 9000")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
"Just look at their presidential candidates: it's like they're lost in a time warp. They want to tax like Mondale, spend like Carter, and fight like McGovern," DeLay said.

Tom Delay rules!

27 posted on 07/25/2003 2:35:30 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This tagline has been deleted by the Moderators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I really don't see how I "castigated" SG. I have no idea what you are talking about. All I can tell you is that I was being completely sincere when I said that I agreed with dead's comment.

How you got "castigated" from my the language of my response is completely fantastic.
28 posted on 07/25/2003 2:35:32 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I was being sarcastic.
29 posted on 07/25/2003 2:44:39 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I was being sarcastic.

What does that have to do with Dane?

30 posted on 07/25/2003 2:46:11 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Your guess is as good as mine.
31 posted on 07/25/2003 2:47:09 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I do hope that I remain in DeLay's district after we finish redistricting here in Texas next month. It feels good to actually cast a vote for the guy.
32 posted on 07/25/2003 2:48:53 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Calm down, boys. We're all on the same side, I think.

This was a great speech. I hope its themes show up in some TV commercials near election time...that is, if free speech is still allowed.
33 posted on 07/25/2003 2:56:36 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (We're through being cool (you can say that again, Dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
We could use more voices in Washington heaping on the biting scorn and sarcasm our rabid Democrat commissars deserve. The full text of the speech is at Fear and Loathing in the Mother Ship .
34 posted on 07/25/2003 4:18:14 PM PDT by houstonian (Hillary Clinton: Standing proud for Matriarchal Squalor since 1965)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houstonian
Thanks for the link! Mt favorite part...

And Dennis Kucinich – a long-time member of Congress – now calls for legislation – I love this – to ban “mind control” weapons in outer space.

These ideas aren't unpatriotic… they're just weird.

It makes you wonder if at their next presidential debate, the Democrats are all going to show up wearing aluminum-foil helmets to protect their brain waves from the mother ship!

People who believe such things cannot be trusted with national leadership, period.


35 posted on 07/25/2003 5:33:33 PM PDT by Dutchgirl (Another Friendly Floridian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Sir Gawain; Zack Nguyen; Maceman; KantianBurke
But what the hey, feigning indignity, is an old political ploy.

I type one last comment, before leaving work and heading to a Mets game (they won! how bizarre is that?) and I come back to find I’m a conspirator!

Dane, what exactly is my role in this conspiracy? I haven’t figured it out.

My only point was that the GOP (including Bush) spends money in giant, stadium-sized buckets. They do it relentlessly.

I go to work every day, and when I go home, a sizeable chunk of my paycheck is spent on programs that have nothing to do with the constitutionally-defined role of the federal government. Nothing to do with any conservative’s concept of limited government.

Does noting this make me a conspirator? Are people who agree with me co-conspirators? Is criticism of the GOP anti-American? Am I a Dixie Chick? Am I the fat one? She’s a bitch, so I’d rather be one of the butter-faced skinny ones, if you don’t mind.

36 posted on 07/25/2003 9:05:29 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jagrmeister
"Intellectual Left"! Give me a break!

There is nothing near intellectual about the left. An intellectual uses truth, logic, and pragmatism to engage in science and debate. A pseudo-intellectual (liberal, lefty, commie, socialist) is the 180 degree of a true intellectual, they are vermin that confuse the process. I'm so sick and tired of our side calling them "intellectuals" I don't know whether to take a good crap, or go blind. Please stop calling these worthless douchebags "intellectuals" it gives real intellectuals a bad name.

37 posted on 07/25/2003 9:25:40 PM PDT by timydnuc (FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; dead
Are you a DU troll?

Are you kidding? Dead is a legend here on FR.

The Bush administration are big spenders, the facts speak for themselves.

38 posted on 07/25/2003 9:30:21 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timydnuc
I misspelled the phrase. If you re-read my post, you will see that I was trying to say "intellectually dishonest". That phrase does not mean liberals are in any way "intellectuals"- it's a characteristic that refers to a category of dishonest behavior including hyperbole, fallacious arguments, arguing by exception, etc. Trust me- I too share your frustration at fellow conservatives who describe the Left as "elites" or "intellectuals". They are, by and large, mental midgets. And I don't call the liberal professors "intelllectuals"- to me, they are sheltered academics who are removed from reality.
39 posted on 07/26/2003 12:11:43 AM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
To those who understand political realities, few expect spending to be cut from year-to-year, only contained. In that respect, Bush has succeeding- raising spending annually only 3% (aside from defense expenditures) while Clinton raised spending 8%. If anyone advocates cutting spending year-to-year, you had better have a detailed political strategy to accompany it that shows how you can avoid drastic political fallout or I will just as well conclude that you are a wishful thinker.
40 posted on 07/26/2003 12:14:12 AM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson