Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE BEGINNING OF THE END?
Yahoo News ^ | July 16th, 2003 | Ted Rall

Posted on 07/16/2003 5:44:18 PM PDT by FreedomCalls

Bush's Cover-Up Precedes the Scandal

NEW YORK--"When it's all said and done," Bush still confidently insists, "the people of the United States and the world will realize that Saddam Hussein had a weapons program." This once again begs the question of presidential dyslexia: You're supposed to find the WMDs before the war, silly rabbit!

This bizarro Administration does everything bass-ackwards. The recession is hardest on the poor and middle-class, so Bush gives tax cuts to the rich. When an overwhelming invasion force was needed to secure Afghanistan and Iraq, Rumsfeld sent in a skeleton crew. Now that the citizens of those countries want us to go home, Gen. Tommy Franks has announced that our 148,000-man, $5 billion-a-month occupation army will get bigger and stick around until whenever.

Now the Bushists are reversing the traditional lifecycle of every political ruckus from Teapot Dome to Watergate. Knowing that most scandals last as long as a mosquito, smart politicians wait to see whether a given outrage will spark lasting popular fury before concocting a risky cover-up. Not these guys. They've started the cover-up before the scandal has had a chance to catch on!

Little things hook big fish: tax evasion for Al Capone, a minor stock trade for Martha Stewart, a sexual dalliance for Bill Clinton). So it is with George W. Bush: whether or not the man who conned us into two wars ends up sharing a cage with Khalid Sheikh Mohammad could come down to this line from the 2003 State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

The source for that claim is a now-debunked British intelligence dossier from September 24, 2002. Forged letters in the UK report purport to document Iraq's attempts to purchase 550 tons of "yellowcake" uranium ore from Niger. No one is saying who forged the fake purchase orders, though Foreign Secretary Jack Straw claims that the "dodgy dossier" came from a third, unknown, nation.

"A bunch of bull," Ari Fleischer calls the simmering scandal, ridiculing the suggestion that fear of Iraqi nukes was "why we went to war, a central issue of why we went to war."

In fact, in the same State of the Union address in which he referenced Niger, Bush did make Iraqi nuclear weapons a "central issue." "Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans--this time armed by Saddam Hussein," Bush leered into the cameras. "It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known." Vials, canisters and crates refer to, respectively, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.

Almost immediately after receiving it from the British, CIA analysts determined that the Niger info was probably bogus. According to The New York Times, CIA director George Tenet then personally met with Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley--Condi Rice's right-hand man--to make sure Bush didn't mention Niger uranium ore anymore. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency went further, determining that Iraq simply didn't have a nuke program. Based on these facts, "The reference was omitted when Mr. Bush gave [a] speech in Cincinnati on October 7." And it stayed out of Bush's talks until it suddenly popped up in the State of the Union--despite more CIA warnings. Even then, Secretary of State Colin Powell refused to use it in his presentation to the UN a week later. "It was not standing the test of time," said a squeamish Powell.

Behold Slaughtergate's smoking gun: Not only had the CIA had told the White House about the Niger forgery in October 2002, the White House had gotten the message. Nonetheless Bush, after months of excising that argument from his speeches, revived it in January 2003 for use in what is traditionally the most widely watched TV appearance a president makes each year.

Many Americans knew that Bush was lying about Iraqi WMDs. They just didn't care, which is how he retains a 59 percent job approval rating. After getting called on his lies, a smarter politician would have apologized and said that liberating Iraq justified a few fibs.

Considering the conventional wisdom that Bush's idiocy is mitigated by his brilliant cabinet, Bush opted for a weird defense: I'm not a liar--my staff is incompetent! And so the cover-up began.

In the most transparently brokered deal since Ford's pardon of Nixon, Tenet agreed to take the blame for the Niger imbroglio in exchange for not taking the fall. "These 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the president," said Tenet in a prepared statement. "The president is pleased that the director of Central Intelligence acknowledged what needed to be acknowledged," said Ari Fleischer the next day. Bush got his patsy and Tenet kept his job. But career CIA staffers are furious at Bush for sticking them with the blame for a snafu they specifically tried to talk him out of. This is just beginning.

Lying about Niger yellowcake pales next to Bush's other evil chicanery: hobbling the U.S. economy with debt, feeding corporate corruption, opening concentration camps for Muslims and bombing thousands of people to death. But those acts are almost too monstrous to comprehend. Americans easily understand the myriad of little lies--the faked Jessica Lynch "rescue," the phony Saddam statue toppling and now the Niger uranium story--and how they add up to the character of a man unworthy of the office he holds.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anarchist; anarchistsocialist; antiamerican; antibush; anticapitalist; barfalert; blameamericafirst; bushbashing; cartoonist; delusions; fifthcolumnist; hateamericafirst; icanttakemuchmore; idiot; idiotorial; jerk; rall; rallisabowelmovement; reddiaperbaby; socialist; tedrall; unamerican; usefulidiot; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: FreedomCalls
You can only wish that went this thing really blows to shore that you don't find yourself eating out of your own Arss, the BS you spewed above.
21 posted on 07/16/2003 7:03:15 PM PDT by BackSlidenDemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I don't know about you guys, but reading Rall actually makes me feel confident. He is so superbly incorrect in virtually everything he tries to say, that I am bolstered in my confidence that these idiots are truly sawing off the limb upon which they sit.
22 posted on 07/16/2003 7:09:00 PM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
The libs are digging their own grave on this one. The evidence will no doubt be overwhelming, thats why they were waiting to release it, let the RATS get foot-in-mouth disease, and than wallop'em with the truth.
23 posted on 07/16/2003 7:18:03 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Not only had the CIA had told the White House about the Niger forgery in October 2002, the White House had gotten the message.

Whoops!

CIA didn't get disputed documents until February 2003 after Bush claim

24 posted on 07/16/2003 7:20:42 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
That's at the very least the first lie; see #24 for another one!
25 posted on 07/16/2003 7:22:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The Boston Globe is a reference for the truth?
26 posted on 07/16/2003 7:28:09 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: michigander
I know......I'm still laughing here. I started to go by it line by line, but I figured I'd still be here Labor Day!
27 posted on 07/16/2003 7:29:23 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I know......I'm still laughing here.

They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt and if it sounds too good to be true (even if it's what one wants to hear)...

28 posted on 07/16/2003 7:37:10 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Pentagon Bombshell: U.S. Uncovers WMD Document 'Mother Lode'

While these idiots are squawking like birdbrains that they are, Tom Brokaw is moving on. He won't support Bush or try to correct the squawking morons, but he won't continue to spread the propaganda. Within two months, the "Bush lied" will be proven to be pure political propaganda and the backlash will begin.

As I said about a month ago, Bush KNOWS his intelligence was right and is waiting until the cocaphony of haters reach their crescendo and he will plot the "smoking gun" down in front of them in such a manner that they will be left standing there with their mouths open looking like the fools and haters that they are.

29 posted on 07/16/2003 7:45:05 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Can't wait to serve up some well directed crow.(?)
30 posted on 07/16/2003 7:49:47 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
That Rall cartoon wasn't as visually repugnant as most I've seen. Usually in black and white and so full of involved commentary and leftist rant that any subtleties (sp? too tired to look it up) are either lost or weren't there to begin with. His drawing is in a word, ugly.

Prairie
31 posted on 07/16/2003 7:50:08 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I'm a monthly donor to FRee Republic. And proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: michigander; Howlin; FreedomCalls; ladyinred; KellyAdmirer; John Lenin; Richard Axtell; ...
Pentagon Bombshell: U.S. Uncovers WMD Document 'Mother Lode'
32 posted on 07/16/2003 7:54:33 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Like this one?

When people said the left would claim Liberia was "all about oil" it was said as a joke -- like no one would stoop so low as to make that claim. Well, guess what? Ted Rall made that claim.

33 posted on 07/16/2003 8:06:13 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You know, articles like this make me wish I was reading a newpaper so I could get some good use our of it at the cabin's outhouse. But reading this accentuates the hygenic side of net-news. I can read it, but I don't have to touch it. These people have to troll in the sewers to come up with trash like this.
34 posted on 07/16/2003 8:19:47 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Precisely. I was bored after reading 1 1/2 frames. Like most libs, his message gets lost.

Prairie
35 posted on 07/16/2003 8:27:21 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I'm a monthly donor to FRee Republic. And proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I only got 1-1/2 paragraphs in before the BS overwhelmed me. It would be much too troublesome to refute it line-by-line; within the passage I read, there were no facts.

Let me guess: Ted Rall is seriously mentally ill and deeply loaths himself. Rather than admit to having a problem (and maybe seeking help), he projects his self-hatred onto the U.S. Just like that other desperately unhappy leftist, Morford.
36 posted on 07/16/2003 9:46:51 PM PDT by exDemMom (W in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Those cartoons are about as amateurish, devoid of sense, and unfunny as the ones I see in the college paper. I'm surprised any professional newspaper would bother printing them.
37 posted on 07/16/2003 9:48:34 PM PDT by exDemMom (W in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson