1 posted on
07/13/2003 5:14:06 PM PDT by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Pokey78
Unnamed sources rock.
2 posted on
07/13/2003 5:16:24 PM PDT by
Satadru
To: All
Raise Your Hand If You Want To Donate To Free Republic!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
07/13/2003 5:18:01 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Pokey78
Now why am I not surprised the French had a role in this?
4 posted on
07/13/2003 5:19:19 PM PDT by
rintense
(Freedom is contagious, and everyone wants to catch it!)
To: Peach; Howlin; Dog; Ernest_at_the_Beach; backhoe; BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; FairOpinion
Weasel alert!
"The French secret service is believed to have refused to allow MI6 to give the Americans "credible" intelligence showing that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger, US intelligence sources said yesterday."
5 posted on
07/13/2003 5:21:28 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: Pokey78
How precisely does this rise above the level of sheer idle speculation? The CIA asserts the intelligence is faulty, Blair insists it's genuine but cannot be shared, so someone simply decides it cannot be shared because the French are withholding permission. Where's the substance?
6 posted on
07/13/2003 5:22:06 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Cathryn Crawford
British officials... insisted that the intelligence behind it was genuine and had nothing to do with the fake documents. It was convincing and they were sticking with it, the officials said. They dismissed a report from a former US diplomat who was sent to Niger to investigate the claims and rejected them. "He seems to have asked a few people if it was true and when they said 'no' he accepted it all," one official said. "We see no reason at all to change our assessment."
7 posted on
07/13/2003 5:22:54 PM PDT by
marron
To: Pokey78
Click!A big question has been 'why would the British government not share the other intelligence about Niger'? Jack Straw stood by the British intelligence, saying there was more than just the documents that Wilson claims to be fake (though Wilson never saw them).We now know why. French secret service 'kept CIA in the dark over Iraq and uranium':
"The French secret service is believed to have refused to allow MI6 to give the Americans 'credible' intelligence showing that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger, US intelligence sources said yesterday. MI6 had more than one 'different and credible' piece of intelligence to show that Iraq was attempting to buy the ore, known as yellowcake, British officials insisted. But it was given to them by at least one and possibly two intelligence services and, under the rules governing cooperation, it could not be shared with anyone else without the originator's permission.
US intelligence sources believe that the most likely source of the MI6 intelligence was the French secret service, the DGSE. Niger is a former French colony and its uranium mines are run by a French company that comes under the control of the French Atomic Energy Commission."
As I said in the blog entry linked above (click Straw's name): What did the Clinton's know, and when did they know it? Remember this:
"France's first lady expressed her support for a presidential run by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, saying that such a candidacy would be an inspiration to women worldwide."
Folks, there really is a Watergate style scandal coming. But it is not going to be about the administration. It is going to be about the Democrats.
8 posted on
07/13/2003 5:23:23 PM PDT by
William McKinley
(You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you.)
To: Pokey78
Uck the rench.
To: Pokey78
Why is Bush/Tenet/everyone else so defensive about this matter?
Tony Blair is right ... sticking to his guns.
24 posted on
07/13/2003 5:42:37 PM PDT by
aculeus
To: Pokey78
The French secret service is believed to have refused to allow MI6 to give the Americans "credible" intelligence showing that Iraq was trying to buy uranium ore from Niger, US intelligence sources said yesterday. Blame the French, cool.
26 posted on
07/13/2003 5:43:06 PM PDT by
A. Pole
To: Pokey78
I hope that Blairs visit next week will clear up some of this.
To: Pokey78
The Washington Post reported several months ago that the forged Niger documents entered the intelligence communist from French intelligence.
Worthy of note that the documents were exposed as fake almost immediately after being made public.
37 posted on
07/13/2003 5:53:31 PM PDT by
DPB101
To: Pokey78
Hmmm....... ABC Radio headlines all afternoon:" the uranium-gate controversy continues to be a growing problem for President Bush"yeah...thanks to all the usual leftist weenie suspects, and now the damn French again!
52 posted on
07/13/2003 6:05:03 PM PDT by
gitmogrunt
(can the hearings be far off? ,,,,,,,then impeachment?(facetious/sarcastic/post))
To: Pokey78
And people want to lighten-up on the French boycott......NEVER!
57 posted on
07/13/2003 6:09:21 PM PDT by
mystery-ak
(The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
To: Pokey78
Those Frenchies..............
60 posted on
07/13/2003 6:12:35 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES - Sure, it's tough to play with us, but there's no game without us.)
To: Pokey78
bump for later reference. This is going to be interesting.
To: Pokey78
I was hoping the lid could stay on until the Cogressional hearings got started on 'Nigerian/Uraniumgate.
"Does the Administration wish to call witness? Just one Mr Chairman, Double-Agent aka Chief Inspector Closeau."
To: Pokey78
What always blows my mind in these situations is the silence on our part regarding the French failure to release this information. Why? What do we have to lose? If the sources are French, then they should take it up with their government.......unless, the sources are folks we are trying to protect.....which is the silent component in the article. There is the nub.
To: Pokey78; All
Outstanding! Right on the button, comments bump!
84 posted on
07/13/2003 7:20:02 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: Pukin Dog; PhiKapMom; Dolphy
Ping
101 posted on
07/13/2003 8:06:57 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson