The dems are pretty stupid. The other day, Rush was talking about how, since Nixon, their basic road to political victory has been the scandal, and they've really let the development of any agenda beyond that atrophy. If they were as smart as they pretend to be, the question they really should be asking is:
"What don't WE know, and when will we know it?"
These people forget that George Sr. was himself, CIA Director, and it would take a whole lot more than a questionable line in a State of the Union Address to cause a falling out between the CIA and the Bushes. I'm sure there are probably still a few senior careerists at Langley that got their start under George Senior.
I guess the dems have been revising history long enough that they've forgotten how to look at it objectively and in perspective. Their buying into their own lies and will pay for them dearly....#8-)
Bingo!
I guess the dems have been revising history long enough that they've forgotten how to look at it objectively and in perspective. Their buying into their own lies and will pay for them dearly....#8-)
Excellent points!
"What don't WE know, and when will we know it?"This is the question that concerns me. Not only have we not found the WMD we thought Saddam had, not only have we not found Saddam, we have not found the materials we know he had, because it had been inventoried by the UN after the first Gulf War. We did not know about 9/11 beforehand, we likely have not gotten Osama. There is a serious deficiency in our intelligence. But the Democrats won't drop the partisan games and be patriots and stand down and assist in finding out how to better enable our intelligence community to do their jobs well.
Probably because they know the root cause goes back to the Torricelli amendment.