Replies

If there is anything I have learned from history, and I have been reading it for over forty years, it is that Hamilton was correct in his opinion of Jefferson.

AMEN!!

What was his opinion?

Exactly. Jefferson was a superb rhetoritician but very mediocre with practical application of the principles he espoused.

His life was flawed by the inability to deal with slavery when he knew it was wrong. His words are forever diminished by the knowledge that "freedom" as he spoke of it apparently did not apply to all men. Hamilon founded the New York Society for the Manumission of Slaves. Jefferson never even freed his slaves after his death, except for those within Sally Hemmings' family.

His presidency was a disaster with the stumble into the Purchase its only redeeming feature which occurred because Napoleon (after the destruction of his army trying (with Jefferson's help)to re-enslave Haiti made North American adventures impossible) figured it was better for the US to have to defend it rather than he. Jefferson was only trying to buy New Orleans when Napoleon threw Louisiana into Monroe's lap. Of course, the ever squeamish Jefferson couldn't even understand that the Constitution allowed such a Purchase. He was so weak on understanding it that he thought an amendment was necessary to make it constitutional.

Jefferson's economic philosophy would have condemned the U.S. to being a second-rate power in an age of developing industrialism, another Argentina or Uraguay. In addition, the encouragement of States' Rights fostered by anti-Nationalism would have perhaps even led to the attempted secession before 1861 and the Slavers might have had a better chance of winning. The longer the Hamiltonian program had a chance to build capitalism the less chance the South had. After all, it was dependent upon a social system at a lower stage of economic development than Feudalism and an economic philosophy equally retarded.

The Union's victory in the Civil War was the final testimony proving irrefutably the superiority of Hamilton's ideas over Jefferson's. Reading their opinions on the constitutionality of the National Bank makes crystal clear Hamilton's superiority in deep intellectual work. Hamilton's is one of the most significant explanations of constitutional power ever written. Jefferson's a pathetic, superficial, dishonest work which attempts to obscure rather than elucidate. If it is a serious attempt it shows Jefferson to be a lightweight who doesn't even address the correct issues. Since I don't think he was a lightweight (though often superficial), he must have just been dishonest.

Forrest MacDonald's biography of Hamilton is the deepest examination of this remarkable genius, the greatest of our founders after Washington and the most maligned by the forces of Evil. These same forces created and maintain to this day the DemocRATic Party, Jefferson's legacy.

Alexander Hamilton was the greatest American politican never to become President. His problem is that being from New York -- even then a "lefty" state -- he had no chance of making to the Senate. The Clintonesque Aaron Burr, of the other hand, New Yorkers elected Senator and the Vice President.

And Jefferson in his opinion of Hamilton.