Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"I SAW [Mel Gibson's] THE PASSION" [the attacks are pretty much demonic]
Act One: Writing for Hollywood | 6/26/03 | Barbara Nicolosi

Posted on 06/26/2003 7:02:56 PM PDT by Polycarp

I SAW THE PASSION

Barbara Nicolosi

6/26/03

So I was at a private screening at Icon Productions yesterday, and got to see a rough cut of The Passion. There were about twelve people in the room, including Mel Gibson, his producing partner Steve and four or five other Icon staffers. After the screening, we talked to Mel and friends for about an hour. (As cool as that was, the quality of the film was such that the celebrity stuff was completely gone from the moment. I can't explain it really, except that it would be like standing in the Sistine Chapel next to, well, someone like Mel Gibson. Great art is a great leveler....) The rough cut we saw obviously didn't have the final score or special effects, and there were many more sub-titles than they will have in the finished film.

So, here's my take...

The Passion is a stunning work of art. It is a devout, act of worship from Mel and his collaborators - in the way that Handel's Messiah and Notre Dame were artistic acts of worship in previous times.

Let's get the controversy out of the way right at the top. The film is faithful to the Gospel, particularly St. John. It is no more anti-Semitic than is the Gospel. There are at least two members of the Sanhedrin who come forward to protest on Jesus' behalf during the sham trial. The Romans are just as guilty of cruelty and hatred against Jesus in the film. And best of all is a final look right into the camera of Mary, holding her dead Son. She is looking at all of us with a kind of , "Look what you've done"/This is for you" expression. A cinematic Pieta worthy of Michelangelo.

Having seen the film now, I can only marvel that the attacks are pretty much demonic. Hopefully, the devil will end up spitefully biting his own tail on this one-- as he does in The Passion by inciting on the executioners of Christ, and thus being complicit in his own ultimate defeat. The Passion is high art. It is the greatest movie about Jesus ever made. In the discussion following the film, Mel and co. were asking us how mainstream theater audiences would react to the film. I told them, "Who cares? What you have here is so much more than just a product to sell. It will live forever, regardless of whether it is a commercial success for you or not."

For those of us who love Jesus, The Passion is devastating to watch. It is so good, I almost couldn't stand it. There is one moment on the way of the cross sequence, in which the whole tragedy unfolding devolves into a vicious riot of hatred between Romans and Jews with the Savior on the ground in the middle of it getting it from both sides. It was so frenzied and terrible, I wanted to run from the room. But then, the film again finds Mary, Jesus's Mother on the sidelines, and her presence gets us through it. Kind of like how Mary's presence helped Jesus get through it, it seemed to me.

The film is lovingly Marian. Mary is perfectly portrayed here. She is contrasted repeatedly with the really super creepy Satan character, who is also a woman (something for the feminist theologians here? heh heh...).

The film is strongly Eucharistic. There is a beautiful juxtaposition of images that cuts from the stripping on Calvary to the unwrapping of the bread to be used at the last Supper. Fabulous stuff.

Every Christian needs to see this film at least once. Just to remember, in our current comfort zones while evil is closing in, the price that was paid for us. On my way home from the screening, I found myself praying in the car, "Jesus, I'm so sorry, I forgot..." How many films have led you to compunction lately? The Passion is a miracle.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-363 next last
To: Ann Archy
No major doctrine about Christ rests on something not in the Bible. However, your doctrine about Mary's assumption is not in the Bible.

By the way, Jesus did exist during the 30 years because the Bible says he was born in the flesh 30 years before he approached John the Baptist. (Worked as a carpenter, went to the Temple as a boy, lived as a human, etc.)

261 posted on 06/27/2003 11:32:23 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
A little test. How often do you heard a Catholic priest talk about the subject of hell? Or purgatory for that matter? Or voice some cautionary note at a funeral? Since Teilhard came on the scene, universalism has been part of the liberal agenda.
262 posted on 06/27/2003 11:39:14 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
A little test. How often do you heard a Catholic priest talk about the subject of hell?

Very often.

263 posted on 06/27/2003 11:49:02 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: whoozit
There is a problem with this guy in that he purports to teach what the scripture teaches, but yet doesn't believe water baptism to be necessary. He is one of the "Faith Only" believers, who think one is simply getting wet when they are baptized. The Bible makes it plain in Mark 16:16 what is going to happen to people who refuse to DO what God has commanded. Baptism is just as important as belief, repentence, and forgiving. If you throw out baptism, you also have to throw out repentence, for that is a "work" as well. It is sad that there are so many of the "holy-roller" types floating around and not enough of the "thus saith the Lord" believers, who actually OBEY him. I better alternative I think (one visit to the forum at your guys site told me what kind of people frequent there) is www.theologyonline.com.

And no, I'm not Catholic. Just a Christian, no more and no less. I prefer the "speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent" way of living the Christian life.

264 posted on 06/27/2003 11:52:07 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Eucharist is a remebrance of the sacrafice that Jesus made

As God is transcendent (doesn't wear a Timex or Rolex) the Eucharist is a participation in the original event.

265 posted on 06/27/2003 12:01:29 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Praise be to Jesus, my savior and king!

Pray for GW and The Way

266 posted on 06/27/2003 12:13:29 PM PDT by bray ( Old Glory Stands for Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
You know, your question reminded me of one of the most haunting homilies I have ever heard. It was not long before 9/11 and after that event happened I gave much thought to this homily.

The priest first spoke in detail of the Eucharist, then he spoke of how to properly receive Holy Communion. He added that one should accept the Host and immediately put It in one's mouth and swallow it. He said he was addressing this because they (in the parish) knew there were certain people taking the Host in their hand and then immediately exiting church to go and defile the Host.

It was chilling and it was almost unbelievable to me that the priest had observed such action and knew the purpose. So not only have I often heard priests speak of hell, but also speak Satan as a real entity (as the priest said it was to honor Satan that this was being done) and not merely symbolic of human frailty.
267 posted on 06/27/2003 12:24:32 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
the Eucharist is a participation in the original event

I like that.

268 posted on 06/27/2003 12:28:29 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
As a 'Pentecostal' I have issues with the Catholic Church.

That does not mean I hate Catholics or think they are all going to hell. I take issue, just as I do with half the Methodist.

I also can't wait to see this film, some of the greatest art of all time is in honor of G_d.
269 posted on 06/27/2003 12:32:29 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
They will respond like Christians...the story is the same, Catholic/Evangelical.
270 posted on 06/27/2003 12:37:12 PM PDT by Blue Scourge (Corruption, lies, murder, lust for power...congratulations your Hillary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Which points to why the rule to take on the tongue was instituted. It makes it more difficult for vicous unbelievers to get hold of the host.
271 posted on 06/27/2003 12:43:33 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I agree.
272 posted on 06/27/2003 12:47:03 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Or perhaps Catholics should spend more time in the Bible.
273 posted on 06/27/2003 12:49:05 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Patrick Madrid is running this story on his blog today. Someone there commented:

"Here is the description I posted on the Rosary Army website after seeing the trailer at last Saturday's Eucharistic Congress:

"There was no English spoken in the scenes shown and the actors were all speaking Latin and Aramaic. The images that stuck out the most were the gratuitousness of the scourging of Jesus before his Crucifixion, Mary stepping on the head of a snake, and the slow motion scene of the Pharisees throwing a bag of silver clear across a room to Judas Iscariot, who has trouble catching it and coins spill all over the floor. They also showed many images of the Crucifixion itself, which definitely reminded me of the end of Braveheart and how much Gibson went for realism. They showed the end of a nail being placed in Jesus' palm, pushed down, and then the hammer about to strike, but stopped short of actually showing the piercing. I won't be surprised at all, though, if they do show that in the movie." The showed the trailer twice and supposedly before the first showing (I only saw the second) they announced the movie would be released on Ash Wednesday.

There were a lot of scenes in the trailer of a yellowish looking snake slithering, and a distinct image of a foot stepping down on it. I don't remember seeing a Pieta-like image in the trailer. The image of Judas and the bag of coins is what really got me."

274 posted on 06/27/2003 12:49:23 PM PDT by NYer (Laudate Dominum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Based on the Bible accounts, it should take about 10 minutes total to film, since the Bible gives a broad outline, not an excruciatingly detailed summary of all that transpired.

That is about the most ignorant statement yet on this thread. The gospels are nothing but detailed vingettes of Christ's ministry. The gospels are not exhaustive, but they are detailed.

275 posted on 06/27/2003 1:01:37 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: txzman
Or perhaps Catholics should spend more time in the Bible.

Perhaps you should learn what you are talking about before you pretend to be an authority.

276 posted on 06/27/2003 1:08:41 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
"Satan character?!!"

What's that all about ?

A SHORT STUDY ON SATAN

excerpt:

"According to I Jn 3:8, the express purpose of the coming of Jesus into the world was 'that he might destroy the works of the devil'. Everywhere in the NT we see a great conflict between the forces of God on one hand, and those of evil led by Satan on the other. The severity of the conflict is clear."

277 posted on 06/27/2003 1:12:38 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
OK, the Gospels are the same in the Catholic Bible as they are in the Pentecostal Bible ... in fact most hard core died-in-the-wool Pentecostals prefer the King James. As long as the story is true to the gospels it will transcend denomination or affiliation.
278 posted on 06/27/2003 1:14:42 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
The Eucharist is the fulfillment of Christ's promise that he will be with us always.
279 posted on 06/27/2003 1:15:26 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: opus86
Most of us can deal with some poetic license . . .

Gee...that tolerance and opened mindedness isn't what the liberals in the media tell me about your faith. Who am I to believe? Those, such as yourself, in the faith or the antiChristian bigots at the New York Times, ABC, CBS and NBC?

280 posted on 06/27/2003 1:15:53 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-363 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson