Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is a conservative? (Why Williams may not become a Republican, says the naive idealist)
worldnetdaily ^ | June 14, 2003 | Kyle Williams

Posted on 06/14/2003 8:18:22 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

What is a conservative?

by Kyle Williams

What is a conservative? This is a question that has recently become an issue in the conservative movement.

Many pundits have separated conservatives into two groups: paleo-conservatives and neo-conservatives. The former being described as the "old right-wing," being more constitutionally conservative, and the latter being the more moderate side of the conservative movement. As a side note, some conservative pundits say that "neo-conservative" is really code word for pro-Israel, considering the trouble that the far right has gotten into with some bashing Jews. That, however, is not the original meaning of the "neo-conservative" word, from my point of view.

Another issue arises as to whether you can truly be a conservative and forget morality. A recent column by David Horowitz blasted some on the religious right for their criticism of the Republican National Committee and Marc Racicot meeting with leaders from the Human Rights Campaign. With homosexual pundits – like Andrew Sullivan – and organizations, such as the Log Cabin Republicans, the debate becomes fiercer.

These two issues come back to the real question: What is a conservative?

A true conservative is one who observes the governmental philosophy of the founders and the forgotten document called the "Constitution." The philosophy of self, limited government – a constitutional republic – goes hand in hand with morality, based on God's guidelines. That is what a conservative is, at its root.

Delving into issues, conservatism is an approach that is against abortion – with great respect for the sanctity of life, is for less taxes, and for less government, with a philosophy of government which always allows for more freedom.

This is in contrast to a definition of liberalism. It is easy to define conservatism because it basically conserves the freedom-loving ways of America's heritage, but liberalism is a completely different word that does not attach itself to anything tangible. However, those who claim to be liberal tend to support bigger government, more taxes, abortion and socialist ideas – all mixed with a lack of morality.

For many, a big reason for not being a conservative is looking at those who claim to be conservative. The political figureheads of the conservative movement become hypocritical at times. Unfortunately, many in national politics claim to be conservative, but are not, and continually misrepresent what it really means to be a conservative. Conservative leaders have nothing to hide behind, but liberal leaders can and do hide behind emotionalism.

National politicians tend to be somewhere in the middle. Many adopt conservative ideals when it is convenient, and some adopt liberal ideals when it is convenient – all in an effort to gain more power.

As a nation, we debate politics, not principles. That's the problem. After so long, we tend to forget what our real agendas are and the only driving goal is power. After politicians gain power, all they work for is a goal of re-election. Thus, when the only goal is to get Republicans in power in an effort to deprive the Democrats of power, they sometimes forget why they wanted change in the first place.

That is the reason I have a problem with the Republican Party and that is the reason why I doubt I will register as a Republican in four years. The national platform is that of a goal of political power, compromise and lack of conservatism. When you get so far up on the political totem pole, power corrupts – this is evident in many who claim to be conservative, but whose only goal is power.

Some policymakers, political consultants and politicians within the GOP need to be reminded what a true conservative is. At its core, conservatism is the conservation of the limited, constitutional republican form of self-government, mixed with the morality of God's laws and guidelines.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: conservative; gop; kylewilliams; principles; punkmoderator; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: Sir Gawain
oh yeah this was real cute. And will not be forgotton.
41 posted on 06/14/2003 9:09:59 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
That's lame and very telling.
42 posted on 06/14/2003 9:17:19 PM PDT by nunya bidness (It's not an assault weapon, it's a Homeland Defense Rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
ping
43 posted on 06/14/2003 9:17:43 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Was that your reply or did someone edit it? Is this my typing?
44 posted on 06/14/2003 9:19:35 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Mongo only pawn in game of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
It isn't the first thread that this is now happening to either. You are right it is lame and very telling too!
45 posted on 06/14/2003 9:20:22 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Absolutely. Those who seek power for the sake of having power should be on a very short leash.

A true conservative is one who observes the governmental philosophy of the founders and the forgotten document called the "Constitution." The philosophy of self, limited government – a constitutional republic – goes hand in hand with morality, based on God's guidelines. That is what a conservative is, at its root.

But when one who meets those charactaristics begings to force those ideal upon others, then they no longer can be Conservatives. I don't know what to call them, but there are plenty here on FR that would be glad to force 'conservatism' and 'morality' on others at by the force of law and point of gun. They would be happy to jail or exterminate opposing or dissenting political views.

There needs to be an identifying name for this group to separate them from Conservatives.

46 posted on 06/14/2003 9:26:01 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excessive legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Thanks. It's shameful, but not surprising.
47 posted on 06/14/2003 9:26:11 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Someone is just protecting their phony baloney job.
48 posted on 06/14/2003 9:26:47 PM PDT by nunya bidness (It's not an assault weapon, it's a Homeland Defense Rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Republican Party make more, more,biger GOVERNMENT
49 posted on 06/14/2003 9:27:33 PM PDT by certify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
What's the term for attributing quotes to a person that didn't say or write them?
50 posted on 06/14/2003 9:33:37 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Mongo only pawn in game of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: certify
Government is the problem

Ronald Reagan



51 posted on 06/14/2003 9:34:56 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Plagerism. But I could have the spelling wrong.
52 posted on 06/14/2003 9:36:26 PM PDT by nunya bidness (It's not an assault weapon, it's a Homeland Defense Rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain; TLBSHOW; nunya bidness; Kwilliams
That's one way to run a conservative off the site, I guess.

Nice article, Kyle. Please ignore the mod behind the curtain and join in the discussion.

What crappy thing to do with the title!

53 posted on 06/14/2003 9:37:56 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Reverse plagiarism? Putting words in someone's mouth?
54 posted on 06/14/2003 9:39:58 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ff--150
their tactics had to change by going over to the conservative side, and changing the rules and the jargon there

Yes, this has been an ongoing part of their (the Democrats') tactics for years. They'll try anything. In fact, sometimes it seems like every couple of days one of these scumbags throws up a vanity thread here on FR with the phrase "neo-con" in the title. The idea, of course, is to divide and conquer.

I've always considered it laughable and I rarely click on those threads anymore because they are boring. But hey, I guess if they believe they can lure a few naive youngsters like this Kyle Williams into a wholly fabricated, non-issue "debate" then maybe it's worth it.

By the way, I also get a laugh out of those jargon-bending threads with the phrase "neo-confederate" in the title - - now there's a phrase that helps confuse the easily confusable.

55 posted on 06/14/2003 9:42:37 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Plagarism...;)
56 posted on 06/14/2003 9:46:09 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (Where are my anti-anxiety pills?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Plagiarism.
57 posted on 06/14/2003 9:49:32 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (Mongo only pawn in game of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Its now all about principles and lack of them by the Republicans which is a problem for the GOP.
58 posted on 06/14/2003 9:51:30 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Why is it that whenever someone doesn't get 101% of what they want, they immediately cry that their political leaders have lost sight of conservatism and now it is all about keeping power?

BS if there is a single definition of conservatism, there is no 100 point list where one must be in agreement with all 100 points. No, there are different definitions of conservatism, but they all overlap in enough areas to have mutual principles and goals on most, but not all issues. There is not a single perfect knot, but rather many different kinds of knots, but they all share the same components functions, and similarities in method of production.

90% of the whiners on these threads would be aghast to realize how different their interpretations of conservatism are, but they temprorarily ignore that to focus on their shared trait of dissatisfaction in order to tear apart that boat with the oh so glaring imperfection. Ignore the storm, ignore that it floats, ignore that it is performing most of its intended functions, yes that imperfection cannot be allowed to stand for another second and must be removed. And then we all drown in the sea of liberalism.

Geniuses.
59 posted on 06/14/2003 9:52:00 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Re: your post #20

(LOUD APPLAUSE!!!)

I am always delighted beyond words when somebody "gets it".

60 posted on 06/14/2003 9:52:17 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson