Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it? And was she part of it?
6.8.03 | Mia T

Posted on 06/08/2003 5:13:09 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Transcript of Juanita Broaddrick's Interview on Dateline NBC

MSNBC
24 Feb 1999

 

       LAST WEEK, as NBC News continued its investigation, Jane Doe Number 5 went public with her extraordinary allegation --

that she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton 21 years ago. To some this is an old and unprovable accusation that should never have been circulated to begin with. To others it's a story that must be told. Is she to be believed? Or is Jane Doe Number 5 the latest weapon in a relentless political war against Bill Clinton?
       Juanita Broaddrick:
"It's important to me to tell what happened. I don't know how people are going to take this. I don't know what they're going to think after all these years and months why I've come forward."
       Jane Doe Number 5 is 56-year-old Juanita Broaddrick, a successful businesswoman who has been the subject of intense political and media speculation. Rumors about Broaddrick's story have been floating around Arkansas and Washington for years, known to both Clinton haters and supporters.
       Broaddrick was pulled into the Paula Jones case, she met with investigators for the House Judiciary Committee and was interviewed by Ken Starr's investigators. And though what she told Starr remains sealed it was seen by 40 members of Congress before the impeachment vote in the House. Later House Republican Whip Tom Delay publicly urged senators to find out what Jane Doe Number 5 had to say before deciding the fate of the president.
       As the whispers about her grew, Broaddrick found herself hounded by the media --

and she says she was the subject of gossip and half truths on the Internet and in the tabloids.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "All these stories are floating around. Different stories of what really happened, of what people think happened and I was tired of everybody putting their own spin on it."
       The Broaddrick story became public last week, and since then her story has appeared in print, on radio and TV.        But much of what you may have read or heard is incomplete. While NBC News was investigating this story and seeking comment from the White House, our work became the subject of much speculation. Tonight, you'll see what we were able to learn and you'll hear from Juanita Broaddrick herself --

a woman who remained silent for two decades and who admits she has lied under oath about this story in the past but now says she wants to tell the truth.
       Juanita Broaddrick's story begins in 1978 --

she was a registered nurse who had started her own nursing home in Van Buren, Arkansas.
       Bill Clinton was the state attorney general who was running for governor:
       Juanita Broaddrick: "I thought he was just something that was gonna be really good for Arkansas. Thought he was a very charismatic man, that had bright ideas for our state… I just really liked him."
       Broaddrick, whose married name at the time was Juanita Hickey, says she was so impressed with Clinton she volunteered to hand out bumper stickers and signs --

her first and only political campaign. Broaddrick says she met Clinton for the first time when he made a campaign stop at her nursing home in the spring of 1978.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "While he was there visiting, he said 'If you're ever in the, ah you know, Little Rock area, please drop by our campaign office,' and he said 'be sure to call me when you come in and call down to the campaign office.'"
       Broaddrick says not long after that conversation she did go to Little Rock for a nursing home meeting held at the Camelot Hotel --

now the Doubletree. She says she checked into the hotel and the next morning called Clinton campaign headquarters. She says she was told Clinton was at his apartment and to call him there.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "I did call and ask him if he was gonna be at the headquarters that day and he said no he didn't plan to be there. He says, Clinton said, 'Why don't I just meet you for coffee in the Camelot coffee shop?'"
       But Broaddrick says Clinton called later --

she thinks it was around 9 in the morning --

and asked if they could meet in her hotel room because there were reporters in the coffee shop.

       Lisa Myers: "Did you think his interest in you at the time was personal or professional?"
       Juanita Broaddrick: "I thought it was professional, completely."
       Myers: "So you thought this was going to be a business meeting?"
       Broaddrick: "Yes I did, I really did."
       Myers: "Did you have qualms at all about him coming to the room?"
       Broaddrick: "I was a little bit uneasy. But, I felt, ah, a real friendship toward this man and I didn't really feel any, um any danger in him coming to my room. I sort of ushered us over to the coffee --

I had coffee sitting on a little table over there by the window and it was a real pretty window view that looked down at the river. And he came around me and sort of put his arm over my shoulder to point to this little building and he said he was real interested if he became governor to restore that little building and then all of a sudden, he turned me around and started kissing me. And that was a real shock."
       Myers: "What did you do?"
       Broaddrick: "I first pushed him away and just told him 'No, please don't do that," and I forget, it's been 21 years, Lisa, and I forget exactly what he was saying. It seems like he was making statements that would relate to 'Did you not know why I was coming up here?' and I told him at the time, I said, 'I'm married, and I have other things going on in my life, and this is something that I'm not interested in.'"
       Myers: "Had you, that morning, or any other time, given him any reason to believe you might be receptive?"
       Broaddrick: "No. None. None whatsoever."
       Myers: "Then what happens?"
       Broaddrick: "Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip (she cries). Just a minute... He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. (crying) And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him 'No,' that I didn't want this to happen (crying) but he wouldn't listen to me."
       Myers: "Did you resist, did you tell him to stop?"
       Broaddrick: "Yes, I told him 'Please don't.' He was such a different person at that moment, he was just a vicious awful person."
       Myers: "You said there was a point at which you stopped resisting?"
       Broaddrick: "Yeah."
       Myers: "Why?"
       Broaddrick: "It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to 'Please stop.' And that's when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip."
       Broaddrick also says the waist of her skirt and her pantyhose were torn.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says 'You better get some ice on that.' And he turned and went out the door."
       Myers: "On your lip?"
       Broaddrick: "Yeah."
       Broaddrick estimates Clinton was in her room less than 30 minutes.
       Myers: "Is there any way at all that Bill Clinton could have thought that this was consensual?"
       Broaddrick: "No. Not with what I told him, and with how I tried to push him away. It was not consensual."
       Myers: "You're saying that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted you, that he raped you."
       Broaddrick: "Yes."
       Myers: "And there is no doubt in your mind that that's what happened?"
       Broaddrick: "No doubt whatsoever."
       While the president and his lawyer declined to be interviewed on camera, through his lawyer the president did issue a statement saying any allegation he assaulted Broaddrick is "absolutely false" and when asked about it Wednesday the president said he had nothing to add to that statement.
       It's important to note --

and Broaddrick concedes --

that aside from her, there are no witnesses and as far as we know, no one saw Clinton enter or leave Broaddrick's room, or even the hotel. She took no photos, kept no evidence and the hotel has no records to confirm that she stayed there. However, Broaddrick does have a friend who backs up her story.
       Norma Kelsey did not want to be interviewed on camera. However she told us she did accompany Broaddrick on that business trip to Little Rock --

they even shared a hotel room. Norma says when she left that morning Broaddrick told her she was planning to see Clinton. But Norma says when she called around lunchtime, Broaddrick was upset and crying so she returned to the room.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "Well, I was very emotional within an hour or so after it happened and then by the time Norma got back my whole top lip was turned out, was very swollen and very ugly looking."
       Norma also says that Broaddrick's lip and mouth were badly swollen, that her pantyhose had been ripped off and she says Broaddrick told her she had been sexually assaulted by Clinton.
       Myers: "Did you feel any internal injuries?"
       Broaddrick: "Of course. I felt, I felt, just the whole thing you can imagine of being violated. I felt, of course there was pain."
       Myers: "Did you consider going to a doctor?"
       Broaddrick: "No. Not at all. I just wanted to get home. I just, ah, I wanted it to all go away. I wanted to just walk outta there and forget that it had never happened, because I felt very responsible that I had allowed him to come to my room."
       Broaddrick says she decided to leave the hotel immediately without going to the nursing home meeting. She says after Norma helped ice her lip, the two of them left Little Rock and drove more than two hours back to Van Buren.
       Juanita Broaddrick: "We were still in shock, Lisa, over what had happened… It was like this is a horrible thing and I'm gonna wake up in a minute and this is not going to be true."
       Norma told us on the drive back, Broaddrick was very, very upset and in shock and says Broaddrick blamed herself for letting Clinton in her room. And Broaddrick says she never considered going to the police --

especially since Clinton was the Arkansas attorney general at the time.
       Myers: "The question everyone is going to ask is 'Juanita, why didn't you report this 21 years ago?'"
       Broaddrick: "I didn't think anyone would believe me in the world."
       If Juanita Broaddrick ever wanted to press charges against Bill Clinton, it's too late. The statute of limitations in Arkansas is six years.
       If something did happen in that hotel room, who else knew about it? NBC News spent four weeks trying to confirm as many details as possible.
       Lisa Myers: "Did you tell your husband when you got home?"
       Juanita Broaddrick: "No, my husband never knew."
       Juanita Broaddrick says that at the time of the alleged sexual assault her marriage was on the rocks. She says she never told her husband, Gary Hickey, about the alleged incident and told him the swollen lip was the result of an accident. Hickey tells NBC News he doesn't recall either the injury or her explanation. At the time, she was having an affair with the man who would become her second husband --

David Broaddrick --

to whom she's been married 18 years. She says she saw David and told him what happened soon after she returned home.
       Myers: "Did she have any visible injuries?"
       David Broaddrick: "Yes. She, uh, her top lip was black."
       Myers: "As best you can remember, what did she tell you?"
       David Broaddrick: "Uh, like I said, I don't remember the words but that she had been raped by Bill Clinton."
       Myers: "Other than her lip, did she have any injuries?"
       David Broaddrick: "Just mentally she was in bad shape."
       Juanita Broaddrick also says her affair with David made her even more reluctant to report the incident:
       Juanita Broaddrick: "I don't think I would have been real honorable back then in the 70s to have been married and having this affair. I just didn't think anyone would have believed me."
       So who else did Broaddrick talk to?
       Three of her friends tell NBC News she told them about the alleged incident at the time: Susan Lewis...
       Susan Lewis: "It was very traumatic for her."
       Louise Ma...
       Myers: "Did you urge her to report it?"
       Louise Ma: "No."
       Myers: "Why not?"
       Louise Ma: "Because women were made victims at the time. And you know what the courts were like in that time period. It was always the woman's fault."
       And Jean Darden, the sister of Norma Kelsey, the woman who says she saw Juanita at the hotel. Both admit they have a serious reason not to like Bill Clinton --

in 1981 as governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of their father's killer, making him eligible for parole.
       The stories her friends tell from 20 years ago are consistent --

and Broaddrick herself says she recalls many details. For instance, the outfit she was wearing, the hotel room furnishings, and the time of year --

spring. However, there is one important thing she does not remember --

when the alleged incident happened: not the date, not even the month.
       Lisa Myers: "Some people would say, how can you not remember the specific date of an event as traumatic as this?"
       Juanita Broaddrick: "I really don't have an answer for that except to say I remember the approximate time of year. I probably should remember the date, although it's something I wanted to forget."
       So NBC News tried to figure out the date of the alleged assault. Broaddrick gave us access to all the business and personal records she says she could find. We also checked public records, nursing home records and convention schedules.
       And indeed there was a nursing home meeting at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock on April 25, 1978. Further, state records show Broaddrick got credit for a nursing home seminar that was held that day, April 25.
       So was Bill Clinton even in Little Rock on April 25, 1978? Despite our repeated requests, the White House would not answer that question and declined to release any information about his schedule.
       So we checked 45 Arkansas newspapers and talked to a dozen former Clinton staffers. We found no evidence that Clinton had any public appearances on the morning in question. Articles in Arkansas newspapers suggest he was in Little Rock that day.
       And remember the little building Broaddrick says Clinton pointed to just before the alleged assault in the hotel room? We checked that too, and in fact the Pulaski County jail was visible from rooms facing the river. It has since been demolished.
       But what happened after the alleged assault? It turns out, just three weeks later Broaddrick actually attended a Clinton fundraiser with her first husband.
       Myers: "Some people would wonder why you would go to a fundraiser for someone who you say sexually assaulted you. Couldn't you have said you were sick or gotten out of it?"
       Broaddrick: "I think I was still in denial that time exactly what had happened to me. I still felt very guilty at that time that it was my fault. By letting him come to the room I had given him the wrong idea and just shut up and accept your punishment and don't ever do it again."
       Broaddrick also told us Clinton called her a half dozen times at the nursing home. She says he got through once and asked her when she was coming back to Little Rock. Her response, she says, "I'm not."
       Then in 1979, a year after the alleged assault, Broaddrick was named by Clinton to a non-paying position on a state advisory board.
       Myers: "Did you have reservations about accepting any appointment by Governor Clinton?"
       Broaddrick: "Yes, but I had more or less said to the association that I would do this before I knew it was a governor appointing job. When I agreed to do it I had no idea it was an appointment."
       Over the years, Broaddrick said she had business dealings with the governor's office but not Clinton personally. In 1984, she received a letter signed by Clinton after her nursing home was named one of the state's best facilities. At the bottom, there is a handwritten note that says, "I admire you very much." A routine political thank you? She interprets it as a thank you for her silence.
       In 1990, Clinton honored one of the patients at the nursing home, but Broaddrick says she wasn't there, and didn't learn of the visit until after the fact.
       Broaddrick says she had no face-to-face contact with Clinton until 1991, when she attended a meeting in Little Rock with two friends. They all say it was a nursing home meeting --

but none can remember the date, nor do they have any records --

so we can't confirm it.
       Broaddrick does remember that she was suddenly called out of the meeting, and, she says, to her surprise, there was Bill Clinton in the hallway. One friend says she saw them talking:
       Broaddrick: "And he immediately began this profuse apology, saying, 'Juanita, I'm so sorry for what I did. I'm not the man that I used to be, can you ever forgive me? What can I do to make this up to you?' And I'm standing there in absolute shock. And I told him to go to hell, and I walked off."
       But Broaddrick remained silent when she learned soon after that Clinton was making a bid for the Oval Office.
       Myers: "Here the man is running for president, doesn't the country have a right to know this?"
       Broaddrick: "Yes, and that's what I got to thinking about --

David and I talked about it. We talked about it, and I cried about it. It brought up a lot of hurt, and a lot of things that I'd buried years ago. And then we just decided it wouldn't be in our best interest to do it. So we decided not to."
       In fact, Clinton's political opponents say she rebuffed their efforts to get her to come forward before the 1992 election. After she turned them down, one of the men suggested she had been paid off.
       Myers: "Did you receive any payoff to stay silent?"
       Broaddrick: "Oh goodness, no. I mean how could anyone be bribed or paid-off for, for something that, to not say anything about something that horrible?"
       Myers: "Did Bill Clinton or anyone near him ever threaten you, try to intimidate you, do anything to keep you silent?"
       Broaddrick: "No."
       Myers: "This has been strictly your choice."
       Broaddrick: "Yes."
       Broaddrick says she was determined to keep the incident quiet.
       But in 1997, her hand was forced when she was subpoenaed by Paula Jones' lawyers.
       She filed an affidavit in that case --

under oath as Jane Doe 5 --

denying any "unwelcome sexual advances" by Clinton. She said "These allegations are untrue," and "there is no truth to the rumors."
       Broaddrick: "I didn't want to be forced to testify about one of the most horrific events in my life. I didn't want to go through it again."
       She later told the same story, denying the assault, in a sworn deposition in the Jones case.
       Myers: "Last March another woman comes forward, Kathleen Willey, accuses the president of unwanted sexual advances --

why didn't you come forward?"
       Broaddrick: "Well Lisa, I would get up in the morning and I would think: it's the thing to do. Then by nighttime I would think that could bring no good whatsoever to my life. And I'm sorry for these women. I'm sorry for what they went through, but I just wasn't brave enough to do it. There's nothing else to say."
       But she changed her mind and changed her story, when Independent Counsel Ken Starr's office approached her last April --

investigating wrong-doing in the Jones case.
       Broaddrick says she feared lying to a federal grand jury, and once Starr granted her immunity from prosecution for perjury --

she agreed to come forward with details of her allegations against Clinton.
       But Starr did not pursue the allegations further because he was investigating obstruction of justice charges against the president. Broaddrick never alleged any obstruction --

said the president never urged her to lie --

so Starr didn't pursue the allegations any further.
       Finally, after months of contact with us, Broadderick decided to speak to NBC News, on Jan. 20, in the middle of the Senate impeachment trial.
       Myers: "Then why now Juanita?"
       Broaddrick: (Very emotional) "I just couldn't hold it in any longer. I didn't want [my] granddaughters and nieces, when they're 21 years old to turn to me and say, 'Why didn't you tell what this man did to you?'"
       We repeatedly asked the White House what it knew about Juanita Broaddrick --

about her character or possible motivation. We got no response.
       We checked with local and federal law enforcement officials, who told us she's a solid citizen with no criminal record and that they take her allegations very seriously.
       Broaddrick knows that some people have suggested her injuries 21 years ago were inflicted not by Clinton, but by her first husband, Gary Hickey.
       Divorce papers obtained by NBC News show that one year after the alleged assault by Clinton, Juanita and Hickey had an altercation. She says Hickey struck her in the mouth. He told NBC News it was an accident. Broaddrick says that is the only time her husband hit her, and there are no records of any earlier incident.
       Could Broaddrick have a financial motive --

is she hoping to cash in? She says she and her husband are financially comfortable, have turned down any offer to tell her story for money, and have no plans for anything else.
       Myers: "No book deal?"
       Broaddrick: "No book deal."
       Myers: "No lawsuit?
       Broaddrick: "Absolutely not. I don't want to sue Bill Clinton and I do not want to write a book."
       Finally, did Broaddrick have any other motivation for going public now with her allegations? Were politics behind the decision? Broaddrick's personal attorney is a Republican state senator in Arkansas, but he says he did not know she decided to go public until she talked to NBC. Broaddrick says she is not registered with any political party --

and the Broadrricks say they have donated money to both Republican and Democratic candidates.
       Myers: "What is the purpose? Do you want to destroy the president?"
       Broaddrick: "No, I don't want to do anything. I do not have an agenda. I want to put all these rumors to rest. I buried this a long time ago, Lisa, and the only thing I'm trying to do now is clear up all these stories."
       But after all this time, how does Juanita Broaddrick feel about Bill Clinton?
       Broaddrick: "I couldn't say it on the air. My hatred for him is overwhelming."
       Overwhelming enough to invent a story, to distort a memory, all to destroy a presidency? Absolutely not, she says.
       Myers: "Twenty years after it happened, having never reported it to authorities, after signing an affidavit denying anything ever happened, now you come forward. You understand how skeptical people may be?"
       Broaddrick: "Certainly I can. But I was also afraid what would happen to me if I came forward. I was afraid that I would be destroyed like so many of the other women have been."

© NBC Dateline 1999
Not for commercial use. For fair use for discussion and educational purposes.


1 posted on 06/08/2003 5:13:09 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

THE INTERMINABLE clintons
It's time to take out the trash...
A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE...
NEW AUDIO! Hear the Bill Bennett (PARDONGATE) epilogue .
 
 
Are Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page?...
(Desperately seeking Susan.... Who spiked her, anyway?)

hillary clinton A SECURITY RISK: Removal Calls Begin
 
THE UNSTATED MESSAGE OF THE POWELL EVIDENCE
 
Another mistaken 'conceptzia'
WHY AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT SURVIVE ANOTHER CLINTON
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)
 
Utter-Failure clintons Concoct Left-Wing-Radio Scheme FIG LEAF
Flower Children Fall for the 2 Self-Evident Thugs & Opportunists Yet Again
(Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation)
 
 
THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992
 
How to get rid of the clintons in 3 easy steps
 
the logic of pathologic self-interest
 
missus clinton's REAL virtual office -- 02.28.03 update
 

2 posted on 06/08/2003 5:17:04 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Quote of the Day by friendly
3 posted on 06/08/2003 5:18:00 AM PDT by RJayneJ (To nominate a Quote of the Day rjaynej@freerepublic.com or put my screen name in the To: line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Bookmarked and Bumped.
4 posted on 06/08/2003 5:21:56 AM PDT by demkicker ((I wanna kick some commie butt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hillary Clinton knew it all and she plays the "poor woe is me" part better than anyone else on earth at this very time.

Twisted part of all about this lying itch is that she has no shame and still wants her power back. She is so self-deluded with herself and knows darn well that she needs more than the socialistic liberal base to get elected and somehow this picture of the scorned women is the plan to seduce the great unlearned masses.

As of this date though this "woe is me" has no foundation and thus what is really required is to undermine, cause pain, destroy something, or somebody for the masses to cause them to forget what evil she and her perverted husband brought forth.

There is nothing this bunch will not attempt to regain their power, they are addicted to it.
5 posted on 06/08/2003 5:23:04 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox; Registered; ..
The instantly vanishing, clinton-spiked
Broaddrick-Myers interview video clips
will be reappearing soon
HERE
Q ERTY3 zipper-hoisted PING!

 

 

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

 



6 posted on 06/08/2003 5:33:23 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
The Clintons will never divorce. A spouse cannot be forced to testify against a spouse in a court of law. Bill and Hillary are stuck with each other.
7 posted on 06/08/2003 5:33:42 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
SEN. KNOWNOTHING VICTIM CLINTON bump
Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Holds News Conference
EFFECTIVELY PLEADS 5TH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

by Mia T

 

WASHINGTON- February 22. Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton held her premiere press conference today on Capitol Hill, ostensibly to answer questions about the peddling of White House pardons by her brother and her campaign treasurer. Notably absent among the press queries were any about her own involvement not only in those pardons, but in the larger universe of sold pardons--the incipient clinton scandal du jour--Pardongate.

KnowNothing's brother, Hugh Rodham, secured two of the 141 clinton midnight pardons, one for a cocaine kingpin and the other for a snake-oil swindler. Rodham netted a quick $400,000 for his "work" according to various rodhams and clintons and their assorted lawyers. KnowNothing's campaign treasurer, William Cunningham III, himself a law partner of longtime KnowNothing adviser Harold Ickes, helped obtain last-minute pardons for two convicted felons.

LA FAMIGLIA

Displaying a willingness to throw her brother (along with her husband) to the wolves, Sen. Victim Clinton was quick to make a distinction between her big, bad brother's pardon "work" and that of her campaign treasurer, "a fine lawyer and a fine man." The "family" connection of brother Rodham to Clinton rendered Rodham's "work" offensive, whereas the campaign treasurer Cunningham's connection to the senator and her campaign coffers made his securing of two pardons in record time a sterling example of highminded, effective public service.

KnowNothing is apparently not the best of thinkers. If the "family" connection makes lobbying for cocaine-kingpin and snake-oil-swindler pardons unsavory for brother Rodham, then the "family" connection makes lobbying for the Hasidim 4 (see Keating 5) pardons even more distasteful for the wife, First Lady and senator-elect. Moreover, pardons for votes is arguably a greater offense than pardons for cash.

EFFECTIVELY PLEADS 5TH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

KnowNothing specifically declined to answer when asked whether she discussed the pardons with her husband, effectively pleading the 5th. Turning aside questions about the pardon decisions her husband had made, she told reporters they should address those issues with him and his staff. She refused to say whether he should agree to appear voluntarily before congressional committees investigating the pardons. Interestingly, no one asked her whether she would agree to appear voluntarily before those same congressional committees.

I DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH THAT PARDON

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

RESURRECTING RUFF

KnowNothing noted that her"best memory" was that she never spoke to her brother or to Mr. Cunningham about the pardons. With variations of "I don't have a memory" and "my best memory, and avoiding the more obvious "I don't recall" and "my best recollection," KnowNothing reprised the Ruffian standard used during the clinton years to commit perjury without penalty.

I GET LETTERS

...or more precisely, envelopes. During her denials of involvement in any of the pardons, KnowNothing made the curious claim: "People handed me envelopes, I passed them on [and never opened a single one. Honest.]"

I AM VICTIM

Reprising the role of victim that enabled her to win a senate seat in spite of record-high personal negatives and public failures, the senator peppered her answers about big, bad Hugh (understanding that the subtext was big, bad Bill) with "saddened" and "disappointed" and "heartbroken" and "shocked."

UTTER CONTEMPT FOR THE PEOPLE

This session today was cut short by a staffer when reporters appeared dissatisfied by Senator KnowNothing's lack of candor.

In the end, this press conference full of poses, poll-tested phrases and prevarication was just another display of the clintons' utter contempt for the people. Bill Clinton committed the same error last Sunday in his shameless, lie-filled New York Times Pardongate Apologia.

The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

 
 

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.
 

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)


8 posted on 06/08/2003 5:48:26 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

06.08.03 UPDATE: 

 

Sen. Clinton's Virtual Office Welcome Header

Sen. Clinton's Virtual Office Welcome Header

Sen. Clinton's Virtual Office Welcome Header

GORE ON CLINTON RAPES-THE VIDEO

YOO-HOO missus clinton: THE CLINTON RAPES ARE "UNBECOMING"  

HILLARY "YOU KNOW" CLINTON 

SEN. KNOWNOTHING VICTIM CLINTON 

CLINTON LEGACY OF LYNCHING 

evidence of consciousness of guilt at Ron Brown's funeral
clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme 

HILLARY CLINTON LACKS COGNITIVE CAPACITY TO LEAD 

THE CLINTON LIE-BRARY 

It won't s-p-i-n 

AMERICAN MUSEUM--ER--MUSLIM COUNCIL 

"There isn't a shred of evidence."

 

Privacy Policy 

 
 
 
NEW AUDIO!
Hear the Bill Bennett epilogue
 

spacer

Dear new sucker--er--New Yorker,

This virtual office was established because you are absolutely forbidden to set your peasant foot in my real one. This is how I got here, and this is how I did it.. This helped, too. And this. And this. You had better take a moment to genuflect before the newly erected clinton altar. Additionally, I am pleased to present my new clinton crime family video greeting and video farewell. You would be wise to study them carefully. And don't bother E-mailing me. I couldn't care less what the little people think.

A missive from the smartest woman in the world. Study it.

Sincerely,

Latest clinton News

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it? And was she part of it?
Neither HARLEQUIN PROSE Nor RESPIRATORY ARREST Nor clinton CANINES will resuscitate the moribund, zipper-hoisted coconspirator

Why bill "it was the TERRORISM, stupid" clinton would have been an utter failure even if he weren't a corrupt, cowardly, vacuous, self-serving, balkanizing, opportunistic RapistThug
And why the missus deserves no less than half the credit

Poison Pen Proves Autotoxic:
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme Fails Yet Again

The Clinton Wars: Stockholm Syndrome Revs Spinning Sid

Reciprocal Intern-Exploitation-Purgation Attempt at JFK Library
"I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine...."

Are Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page?...
(Desperately seeking Susan.... Who spiked her, anyway?)

bushwhacked by tailhook: the real reason

Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine,
Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury
REAL "Living History"

The Times Reaps What It Sowed 2

WRITTEN IN STONE 2: the clintons define the clintons

Norwegian Braves clinton's Implicit Threat ("If you give my Nobel to Bush, you'll go to hell.")

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime

COMING APART: What clinton was REALLY saying... and why... when he bashed Bush in Canada

THE "DEBATE"
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent

the logic of pathologic self-interest

The only thing that can stop American power now

Yet More RapeLies: CNNs of Commission, Rapist Demagogues and 9/11

The no-show manuscript
hillary clinton Infrastructure Answers Simon & Schuster: THE TRANSLATION

3 Strikes and You're Out:
The New York Times is "
Wrong" Again

YOO-HOO O'REILLY: Regarding the spoils of war, you are wrong
hillary clinton is a loser BIGTIME

American Gothics Hyperlinked

DECAPITATION

Moynihan Myths

Another mistaken 'conceptzia'
WHY AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT SURVIVE ANOTHER CLINTON
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)

clinton POLICY:
MAKE CERTAIN America was not "the biggest power on the block."

Either they are obsolete… or civilization is

The 30 Seconds that Seemed Like 60 Minutes:

Utter-Failure clintons Concoct Left-Wing-Radio Scheme FIG LEAF(Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation)

"ONE OF THOSE GROUPS OBSESSED WITH THE CLINTONS"

10-Yr Anniversary of WTC Bombing Marks clintons' Utter Failure

hillary clinton A SECURITY RISK: Removal Calls Begin

The wife's self-serving war oscillations are really nothing more than a reprise of the self-serving oscillating ersatz presidency of the husband (Why we cannot afford another clinton. . .)

HILLARY CLINTON KNEW PRECISELY WHO SAMI AL-ARIAN WAS

hillary clinton Covertly Hedges Her Bets on the War While Overtly Betting Everything on the Virtual Certainty--Another Terrorist Attack

THE INTERMINABLE clintons 
It's time to take out the trash...
A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE...
 

THERE SHE GOES -- AGAIN

The Curious Candidacy of Carol Moseley-Braun

running clintons...

On clinton's missus' war oscillations...

How to get rid of the clintons in 3 easy steps

THE UNSTATED MESSAGE OF THE POWELL EVIDENCE

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992

CLINTON RAPE OF BROADDRICK:
PRUDHOMME CONFRONTS GORE -- THE VIDEO

hitchens on the clintons annotated

69% of Voters Nationwide Don't Want hillary clinton to Run for President, EVER

A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory

clinton LIEbrary FLYover & other clinton FLIES

BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

Q ERTY6 utter failure

What did he know. . . and when did he know it ?

SpyLies and Audiotape

PARDONGATE, THE MOVIE--BILL BENNETT EPILOGUE

LEFT-WING TALK RADIO UNVEILED!  

HALF A HOUSE, HALF A BRAIN: Why we were compelled to hit on Simon & Schuster,our personal agitprop & money-laundering machine)

WRITTEN IN STONE: AN ARCHITECT DEFINES THE CLINTONS

DESIGNATED DEMOCRAT ATTACK DOG MAKES ITS DEBUT

Hardball's Softball hillary clinton 'Interview'

Q ERTY8 clinton/Democrat Debacle of '02

Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

hillary clinton and FUNERALS

But they are space aliens

THE OTHER NIXON

A CLOCKWORK ORANGE

The Real Danger of a Fake President:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President

copyright Mia T 2003

 


9 posted on 06/08/2003 6:02:36 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJayneJ
bump!
10 posted on 06/08/2003 6:06:27 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
 Bill and Hillary are stuck with each other.
--TomGuy


The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

bill clinton

With thy sharp teeth this knot intrinsicate
Of life at once untie.

Antony and Cleopatra V, ii, 304-05

 

June 9, 1999

 

Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.

Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.

My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.

The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.

So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.

You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.

And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.

Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)

Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.

Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.

Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing.

In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS

 


11 posted on 06/08/2003 6:18:35 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Like Hitler looking over maps in his Berlin Bunker while concrete dust falls from the vibrations of Soviet Tanks, Hillary and her pudgy Caligula have to play this to the end. There's no turning back for these types. Clinton wanting to repeal the Constitution and Shebeast sniffing around the White House dumpster.

Animals. Feral political animals.
12 posted on 06/08/2003 6:37:31 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
If ever there was proof that the mainstream media is in cahoots with the Clintons, we got it now! In this hyper-hyped book, Hillary portrays herself as the Queen of Victim-Saints. Bill lied to her about Monica, Hillary is a victim. Hillary forives Bill, Hillary is a saint.

The media playing along with this self-serving victim-saint script infuriates me! It's no big deal that Hillary forgave Bill for getting serviced by Monica, her number was legion. The media should be asking Hillary about the rape of Juanita Broaddrick.

How could Hillary have forgiven Bill Clinton for being a rapist? How could she? And when that question gets asked, I'll eat dirt.

13 posted on 06/08/2003 6:44:22 AM PDT by YaYa123 (He's a sorrysackoshit and so is Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE
Entire Juanita interview transcript - bump...
14 posted on 06/08/2003 6:47:45 AM PDT by Libloather (Proud member of the Vast Right Wing Fatwa...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Very nicely put! Great imagery in your words!

Also, I just love everything that Mia T. produces. We are a fortunate bunch to have her talent on FreeRepublic.

15 posted on 06/08/2003 6:52:45 AM PDT by arasina (Thank God the White House now has plenty of CLEAN laundry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; Mia T; Liz; dutchess; LadyK; gc4nra; amom; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Howlin; YaYa123; ..
DICK MORRIS
JUANITTA BRODERICK


FoX News Channel Guests
right after the HILLARY Interview

8pm East Coast Time
5pm West Coast Time


Can't wait...
16 posted on 06/08/2003 7:03:54 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.comt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
preemptive-strike bump!
17 posted on 06/08/2003 7:17:42 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

In her interview with Hillary Clinton, ABC News star Barbara Walters poses a question that could land her husband in a pile of trouble, asking the world's most famous cheated-on spouse: What will you do if there's another Monica Lewinsky?

Though comments by Walters herself suggest that she avoided some of the most politically perilous questions, ABC's top interviewer said Friday she found one question more difficult to ask than any other.

"The toughest question I had to ask her was, what if he does it again?" Walters revealed to radio host Don Imus, adding, "And that's not in [Hillary's] book."

Unless Mrs. Clinton somehow dodged the question altogether, her response could spell trouble for either her political career or her marriage. And maybe both.

Walters to Hillary: What About the Next Monica?
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/07/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

 

A more pertinent question:
What about the PREVIOUS Monicas?

 

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it?
And was she part of it?
Neither HARLEQUIN PROSE Nor RESPIRATORY ARREST Nor clinton CANINES
will resuscitate the moribund, zipper-hoisted coconspirator


THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

 
play tape

18 posted on 06/08/2003 7:19:27 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Mia T; Carl/NewsMax; Sabertooth; Clinton Is Scum; Matt Drudge; Rush Limbaugh; YaYa123; ...
NEVER FORGET



'TELL TALE Photo Proves HILLARY Rage a LIE'

(The Photo)
http://www.newsmax.com/archive/print.shtml?a=2003/6/5/173040

(The Photo)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/source082698.htm

(The Thread)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/923978/posts?=page=39

(The Thread)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/924913/posts?page=43





..IS it SAFE?" = HILLARY on Armed Services Committee..

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=629






NEVER FORGET
19 posted on 06/08/2003 7:26:04 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.comt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Thank you, but Mia-T inspires freeform associating.
20 posted on 06/08/2003 7:33:49 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson