To: harpseal
What about making a penalty for any company that goes off shore. You can go off shore but once a company leaves this country they are banned from selling their product back to us.
To: Bellflower
What about making a penalty for any company that goes off shore. You can go off shore but once a company leaves this country they are banned from selling their product back to us. I would not have a problem with taht in any way.
111 posted on
06/05/2003 8:06:15 AM PDT by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: Bellflower; harpseal
What about making a penalty for any company that goes off shore. You can go off shore but once a company leaves this country they are banned from selling their product back to us.
It's not that easy: Company A is a 100% US company. They sell out to company B in Indochina. They lay everyone off in the states they would use for production. They sell stuff under the old brand name. Which step should they not be able to do?
To: Bellflower
What about making a penalty for any company that goes off shore. You can go off shore but once a company leaves this country they are banned from selling their product back to us.In that case, If I owned the company, I'd simply cash out and close up shop.
BTW, who is John Galt?
131 posted on
06/05/2003 9:41:12 AM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson