Skip to comments.
The Savage Nation - for the week June 2 - June 6
Posted on 06/02/2003 4:03:40 PM PDT by BUSHdude2000
Comment here on what Savage has to say.
The following links are for stations carrying Savage on the internet from 4-7pm PST, 6-9pm CST, 7-10pm EST etc...
KERN - click here to listen
KSTE
KXL
WPHB
WCBM - they tape delay the show on the net, 10p-1a EST, 9p-12m CST
97.1 St. Louis - tape delayed from 10p-1aEST, 9p-12mCST, you have to download their player software
KRLA - not sure yet what their hours of coverage are
If there are other online stations I can add, please let me know
For some Savage sound bites, click here - For a Savage Nation book review, click here
Visit Michael Savage's website
Buy your copy of The Savage Nation:
The Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders, Language and Culture
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 321-340 next last
To: bootless
we'll find out which engineers are screwing up; and we shall move on."When he says "screwing up" I feel like he said this sarcastically. I'm going to find the segment and listen to his tone. Also, the post apparently says "6-5-03", today being 6-4-03, this guy is either looking into the future or making something up.
To: BUSHdude2000
OK, if there's an MP3 link, I'd love to listen to it, too.
As far as the date, I'd think "fat fingers" and not proofing and/or previewing is the simpler explanation. :-)
202
posted on
06/04/2003 4:54:02 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: longfell0w
I thought I prefaced my comment with "when he attacks a liberal caller". He is relentless when a guy is trying to get over of him. Where Rush and Sean talk the polite track and try to debate losers who will never agree, Savage screams at them and tries to wake them up, in the meantime I'm cracking up and damn near falling out of my chair.
To: BUSHdude2000
Where Rush and Sean talk the polite track and try to debate losers who will never agree, Savage screams at them and tries to wake them up, in the meantime I'm cracking up and damn near falling out of my chair. So it IS the Springer sideshow syndrome. Its not what he says but HOW he says it that attracts you. Okay, that helps! Thanks!
204
posted on
06/04/2003 4:58:57 PM PDT
by
longfell0w
(You know I say just what I think, and nothing more and less. -H.W. Longfellow)
To: bootless
My apologies; it was 6-3-03. I record his show so I can listen to it at my leisure and fast forward through the commercials.
I dunno if I saved this particular speech, but Weiner sounded serious.
That's the problem isn't it- you never really know when Weiner is serious or joking? When he calls Jewish liberals who fled Tsarist Russia (RDDB's) "filth" and "vermin", is he joking or serious? After all, what do you do with vermin except exterminate them?
To: longfell0w
You obviously didn't read my other posts to your comments. I like his issues and what he talks about. I read his book twice to absorb it all, it had to do with his content, not the way he presented it.
To: Ambisonx; bootless
I'm listening to Savage's opening segment yesterday, at 2min 50sec into the show he starts discussing the issue in SF that the problem is contractural agreements. No mention of "engineers".
To: BUSHdude2000
Thanks, that's good to know. I appreciate it.
208
posted on
06/04/2003 5:05:33 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: Ambisonx
When he calls Jewish liberals who fled Tsarist Russia (RDDB's) "filth" and "vermin", is he joking or serious? OUCH.
Saving a slot, if the speech did not include the "engineers" remark, still, the big, blaring statement on his website saying that he was cut out of spite is tremendously short-sighted at best ...
209
posted on
06/04/2003 5:07:23 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: bootless
It was contractual problems all along which is why it is interesting that Savage would not have said on 6-3 what he is now saying on 6-4.
To: BUSHdude2000
No- I did- but as I said I was trying to understand about the SHOW. I guess there may not be a way to seperate the SHOW from the rest (website/book/etc) - in that case its personality. So I ask again- does he remind you of yourself, friends of yours or is it he's just saying what you say to liberals? I guess I just prefer Rush & Hannity's "polite" tone as you put it. I think there's enough rudeness in the world- thats all....
211
posted on
06/04/2003 5:09:16 PM PDT
by
longfell0w
(You know I say just what I think, and nothing more and less. -H.W. Longfellow)
To: BUSHdude2000
Martha Stewart "basically loved by American women"? Heck no! Not by this American woman! She treats the (ahem) "little people" like dirt. Good for her for being self-made. But that doesn't excuse breaking the law, if that's what she did. But if there is a preponderance of evidence/reasonable doubt/whatever, how is it right not to investigate it?
212
posted on
06/04/2003 5:09:27 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: Ambisonx; bootless
Amb you hate Savage with a passion and it really shows. I don't understand why you'd devote so much time to a thread for a guy you hate.
When he calls Jewish liberals who fled Tsarist Russia (RDDB's) "filth" and "vermin", is he joking or serious?
If you take that statement by itself, it sounds bad. You are only taking the part of the statement that helps you make your point. When he says this, he's talking about those who left Russia and came here to become lawyers etc, who fight for the same thing the Tsars in Russia wanted. He's mcking them for being lawyers who fight for the filth of this country.
To: bootless
To: Ambisonx
It was contractual problems all along which is why it is interesting that Savage would not have said on 6-3 what he is now saying on 6-4. Perzackly. I remember that Geoff Metcalf was quite open about his contractual uncertainty when he went from daily to weekend-only - he was quite factual and classy, and just said "check my website" to see where I'll be. I had absolutely no problem with that, and he showed respect for everyone - the station, his audience, and himself - in the process. Granted, it was not a national syndication deal, but IMO, that increase in audience all but demands that you be on your best behavior even more...
215
posted on
06/04/2003 5:13:54 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: Ambisonx
It was contractual problems all along which is why it is interesting that Savage would not have said on 6-3 what he is now saying on 6-4.I just posted from his opening segment on 6-3, yesterday. He started out saying it was contractural. You are wrong, you hate the guy and can't get your facts straight.
To: Ambisonx
Well, I don't know if it's relating to a multi-millionaire. I've often heard him take a position contrary to conventional wisdom - even the CW within the conservative community (salary caps for dot-commers, martial law immediately following 9-11, etc.). I don't know if he is committed to that opinion ... I know other talkers will take a position further away from their own belief, but controversial enough to generate calls, and then move to the center as the show goes on...
217
posted on
06/04/2003 5:16:57 PM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: longfell0w
I agree with most of what he says. He's entertaining. He doesn't delve into tax bills to tell us exactly what a guy earning $43,347 a year will get back. So he's not boring. Are you listening now? He's debating the Muslims and the modern world.
To: BUSHdude2000
I am simply holding up a mirror to the Savage Nation by transcribing Weiner's statements. For example:
"and here my little friends, is the subject that breaks my heart that I HAVE TO TELL you. So many liberals in that list of 100 shameful actors and actresses are of the JEWISH faith or of JEWISH parentage or of JEWISH descent. SO MANY of them. SO MANY of them. Al Queda says we'll kill Jews worldwide; Al Queda says we'll kill Christians worldwide and yet marching with the Hollywood morons are people of JEWISH descent. It proves beyond a reasonable doubt to me that they are functionally insane, caring not a whit about their survival or the survival of their country." (12-11-02 broadcast)
_________________________________________________________
You tell me why Weiner singles out Jews for special villification? How come Weiner does not state that the MAJORITY of the shameful Hollywood actors are CHRISTIAN?
I can send you this clip via e-mail if you doubt the transcription.
To: BUSHdude2000
Yeah- listening now- Thanks for the feedback- I understand about the tax bill thing- but I guess I think those things are important. I guess I just like the Limbaughs & Hannitys style a little better. Thanks!
220
posted on
06/04/2003 5:21:18 PM PDT
by
longfell0w
(You know I say just what I think, and nothing more and less. -H.W. Longfellow)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 321-340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson