Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz says Saudi troop withdrawal was 'huge' reason for war with Iraq
Associated Press ^

Posted on 05/30/2003 1:11:24 PM PDT by fritter

Wolfowitz says Saudi troop withdrawal was 'huge' reason for war with Iraq

Associated Press

BRUSSELS, Belgium -- European critics of the Iraq war expressed shock Friday at published remarks by a senior U.S. official playing down Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as the reason for the conflict.

In an interview in the next issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz cited "bureaucratic reasons" for focusing on Saddam Hussein's alleged arsenal and said a "huge" reason for the war was to enable Washington to withdraw its troops from Saudi Arabia.

"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying.

He said one reason for going to war against Iraq that was "almost unnoticed but huge" was the need to maintain American forces in Saudi Arabia as long as Saddam was in power.

Those troops were sent to Saudi Arabia to protect the desert kingdom against Saddam, whose forces invaded Kuwait in 1991, but their presence in the country that houses Islam's holiest sites enraged Islamic fundamentalists, including Osama bin Laden.

Within two weeks of the fall of Baghdad, the United States announced it was removing most of its 5,000 troops from Saudi Arabia and would set up its main regional command center in Qatar.

However, those goals were not spelled out publicly as the United States sought to build international support for the war. Instead, the Bush administration focused on Saddam's failure to dismantle chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.

The failure of U.S. forces to locate extensive weapons stocks has raised doubts in a skeptical Europe whether Iraq represented a global security threat.

Wolfowitz's comments followed a statement by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who suggested this week that Saddam might have destroyed his banned weapons before the war began.

On Friday, the commander of U.S. Marines in Iraq said he was surprised that extensive searches have failed to discover any of the chemical weapons that U.S. intelligence had indicated were supplied to front line Iraqi forces at the outset of the war.

"Believe me, it's not for lack of trying," Lt. Gen. James Conway told reporters. "We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there."

The remarks by Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld revived the controversy over the war as President Bush left for a European tour in which he hopes to put aside the bitterness over the war, which threatened the trans-Atlantic partnership.

In Denmark, whose government supported the war, opposition parties demanded to know whether Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen misled the public about the extent of Saddam's weapons threat.

"It was not what the Danish prime minister said when he advocated support for the war," Jeppe Kofod, the Social Democrats' foreign affairs spokesman, said in response to Wolfowitz's comments. "Those who went to war now have a big problem explaining it."

Former Danish Foreign Minister Niels Helveg Petersen said he was shocked by Wolfowitz's claim. "It leaves the world with one question: What should we believe?" he told The Associated Press.

In Germany, where the war was widely unpopular, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeiting newspaper said the comments about Iraqi weapons showed that America is losing the battle for credibility.

"The charge of deception is inescapable," the newspaper said Friday.

In London, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, who quit as leader of the House of Commons to protest the war, said he doubted Iraq had any such weapons.

"The war was sold on the basis of what was described as a pre-emptive strike, 'Hit Saddam before he hits us,' " Cook told British Broadcasting Corp. "It is now quite clear that Saddam did not have anything with which to hit us in the first place."

During a visit to Poland, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Friday he has "absolutely no doubt" that concrete evidence will be found of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

"Have a little patience," Blair told reporters.

Wolfowitz was in Singapore, where he is due to speak Saturday at the Asia Security Conference of military chiefs and defense ministers from Asian and key Western powers.

He told reporters at the conference that the United States will reorganize its forces worldwide to confront the threat of terrorism.

"We are in the process of taking a fundamental look at our military posture worldwide, including in the United States," Wolfowitz said. "We're facing a very different threat than any one we've faced historically."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; iraqifreedom; paulwolfowitz; warlist; whywefight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last
To: fritter
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz......

Vanity Fair misquoted him. What a surprise. /sarcasm off

Saddam was one evil SOB. I for one don't care if they ever find WMD's. The bottom line is we kicked a bad guys nutz in. And showed some more Arabs we mean business.

41 posted on 05/30/2003 2:22:05 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (This tag line may be closer than it appears in the mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Vanity Fair guy on now making excuses (Fox).
42 posted on 05/30/2003 2:23:34 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; Poohbah
Or baby milk factories...
43 posted on 05/30/2003 2:25:55 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GW469
Wolfowitz now backpeddaling and trying to claim that the major reason for the war was the placement of American troops in the Middle East?

Where did he say that was "the major reason" for the war?

44 posted on 05/30/2003 2:26:52 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Surprise, surprise...
45 posted on 05/30/2003 2:27:37 PM PDT by hchutch (America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GW469
Are you people alway this quick to jump all over anyone with a differing opinion? It's incredible. How do you have any debate? I am not a liberal, but because I have questions about my government I am a troll. This place just isn't worth my time.

Seems to me, they destroyed your opinion and logic fairly quick. You just can't handle it..

By all means, leave. I'm certain many here believe your not worth the time.

46 posted on 05/30/2003 2:28:36 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Dont get involved in this discussion...

ROTFLMAO! Yeah, sure, that'll happen.

What's it been, six weeks?
Was there some sort of statute of limitations on how long before these thing needed to be found after we kicked their ass?
Gee, if they were found too soon, they would have been planted by the CIA.
If they're found after today, they were planted by the CIA.
What was the optimum time? Not before four weeks but not after six weeks?

47 posted on 05/30/2003 2:30:06 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; GW469
Vanity Fair guy on now making excuses (Fox).

For sure. Wolfowitz has documentation that Vanity Fair screwed up. After recent events at the Times these "journalists" might want to make sure they get the facts straight. Very amusing.

Speaking of facts, GW469, there has not been enough time for any reasonable person to conclude there were no WMD's. Iraq is a big place. Keep this in mind too. "W" does not have to show his cards on this subject as soon as he is dealt them. The leftists might consider the past when dealing with "W". I don't think he would do one of his "rope-a-dopes" on the WMD issue but he might not be immediately forthcoming. Get it? Cuz just like a lot of others things he is ahead of the curve. I was watching "W" way before anyone was paying attention to him. He is very very smart.

48 posted on 05/30/2003 2:33:54 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (This tag line may be closer than it appears in the mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GW469
Why are you upset that we shut down Saddam's death camps? Where's your liberal compassion?
49 posted on 05/30/2003 2:35:03 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The most logical answer is that we simply haven't found the stuff yet. We will.

Another logical answer is that we have found the stuff, and are compiling the full report and assembling the evidence before letting it out for the world to see.

50 posted on 05/30/2003 2:35:58 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GW469
I am not a liberal, but because I have questions about my government I am a troll.

No, the reason you appear to be a troll is that you signed up TODAY and the only posts you have made are
(1)posted an accusatory article about a Pentagon contract award, and
(2) your comments on this thread that read like talking points picked up from DNC operatives at DU (only even less substantive if that were possible).

51 posted on 05/30/2003 2:36:22 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Is Jayson Blair working for Vanity Fair now? Contact their editor and ask them why they are fabricating quotes.

vfmail@vf.com
52 posted on 05/30/2003 2:36:58 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: fritter
Wolfowitz is an honest man. Honesty is always the best policy--except when it's being done to you. Everybody knows this but nobody wants to admit it.
53 posted on 05/30/2003 2:37:46 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oops, I obviously posted too soon. They made up his quotes? Yeesh, that's pathetic. Did they really think they'd get away with it???
54 posted on 05/30/2003 2:38:42 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; sheltonmac; Vic Mackey; 4ConservativeJustices
What! The press government would mislead us? I'm shocked!

Me too, simply shocked

We will consult. But let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not fully disarm, for the safety of our people and for the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him--George Bush

It wasn't a reason, it was the reason given by the President in the SOTU address.

55 posted on 05/30/2003 2:40:14 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
I say we make Iraq our 51st state.
56 posted on 05/30/2003 2:41:59 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I've decided to cut back my tagline, one word at a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GW469


An Iraqi man shows a skull unearthed from a mass grave near the central city of Najaf in the latest such find in post-Saddam Iraq At least 500 bodies, consisting of bones of women, children, elderly people and soldiers were found.(AFP/GETTYIMAGES/AHMAD AL-RUBAYE)
57 posted on 05/30/2003 2:42:06 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GW469


Iraq (news - web sites)'s U.S. administrator Paul Bremer (2nd,L) views a vast mass grave in Mahawil, about 55 miles south of Baghdad, where he talked to relatives trying to identify missing family members among piles of bones, May 22, 2003. The grave there may be the largest of the remote mass burial sites uncovered since the fall of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). Photo by Pool/Reuters
58 posted on 05/30/2003 2:44:50 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The more likely case is that the reports from Debka and others that WMD operations were successfully relocated to Syria (the biologicals) and to Iran (the nuclear materials) in the month prior to the commencement of the war.

If we could overturn the government of Iran NOW, before they test their first nuclear weapon (Gaffney is reporting that it may be as early as the end of THIS SUMMER!) we will have all the proof we need.

59 posted on 05/30/2003 2:45:28 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GW469
Great to know how you treat new members with a different opinion than yours.

If you really are just a newbie who has questions about the war rather than a troll just here to cause disruption, then you will probably last for a while around here and maybe even get to enjoy your discussions with other FReepers. At least you appear to be attempting to engage in discussion. Usually, when someone shows up and posts anti-Pentagon articles and accusatory comments about the president the same day he signs up, the troll posts his(or her) inflammatory comments and then disappears. So, maybe you are just a misunderstood newbie. Time will tell.

That said, before making comments about Wolfowitz and Rummy being all over the board and before crying "Scandal!", it's a good idea to check out the sources, look for an agenda, and get your logic lined up. The military action to oust saddaam was way overdue, and a needed lesson and example to other regimes that may continue to aid and support the terrorists that seek to strike out at America.

60 posted on 05/30/2003 2:45:41 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson