[r9etb]

The most logical answer is that we simply haven't found the stuff yet. We will.

Another logical answer is that we have found the stuff, and are compiling the full report and assembling the evidence before letting it out for the world to see.

[Paul Ross]

The more likely case is that the reports from Debka and others that WMD operations were successfully relocated to Syria (the biologicals) and to Iran (the nuclear materials) in the month prior to the commencement of the war.

If we could overturn the government of Iran NOW, before they test their first nuclear weapon (Gaffney is reporting that it may be as early as the end of THIS SUMMER!) we will have all the proof we need.

[Captain Kirk]

One third of the sites? Perhaps you are right but then....why was Rumsfeld so darn certain before the war? Didn't he have "some" idea of where they were? On what basis did he make his claims. Oh, I forgot his intelligence was "secret" and he can't tell us.

If he were here, Machievalli would, of course, have the more logical explanation. The real reason for the war (creating a counterweight to Saudi Arabia and taking the pressure of Israel) didn't play in Peoria ergo unproven and dubious allegations of WMD were used to "scare" conservatives and other potential oppenents into line.

[Captain Kirk]

One third of the sites? Perhaps you are right but then....why was Rumsfeld so darn certain before the war? Didn't he have "some" idea of where they were? On what basis did he make his claims. Oh, I forgot his intelligence was "secret" and he can't tell us.

If he were here, Machievalli would, of course, have the more logical explanation. The real reason for the war (creating a counterweight to Saudi Arabia and taking the pressure of Israel) didn't play in Peoria ergo unproven and dubious allegations of WMD were used to "scare" conservatives and other potential oppenents into line.

[meema]

bump for later