Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Oldest Sculpture' Found In Morocco (400K Years Old)
BBC ^ | 5-23-2003 | Paul Rincon

Posted on 05/23/2003 5:52:37 AM PDT by blam

'Oldest sculpture' found in Morocco

By Paul Rincon
BBC Science

A 400,000-year-old stone object unearthed in Morocco could be the world's oldest attempt at sculpture.

The figurine was found 15 metres below ground

That is the claim of a prehistoric art specialist who says the ancient rock bears clear signs of modification by humans.

The object, which is around six centimetres in length, is shaped like a human figure, with grooves that suggest a neck, arms and legs. On its surface are flakes of a red substance that could be remnants of paint.

The object was found 15 metres below the eroded surface of a terrace on the north bank of the river Draa near the town of Tan-Tan. It was reportedly lying just a few centimetres away from stone handaxes in ground layers dating to the Middle Acheulian period, which lasted from 500,000 to 300,000 years ago.

Cultural controversy

The find is likely to further fuel a vociferous debate over the timing of humanity's discovery of symbolism. Hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus, that were alive during the Acheulian period, are not thought to have been capable of the symbolic thought needed to create art.

Writing in the journal Current Anthropology, Robert Bednarik, president of the International Federation of Rock Art Organisations (IFRAO), suggests that the overall shape of the Tan-Tan object was fashioned by natural processes.

But he argues that conspicuous grooves on the surface of the stone, which appear to emphasise its humanlike appearance, are partially man-made. Mr Bednarik claims that some of these grooves were made by repeated battering with a stone tool to connect up natural depressions in the rock.

Stone handaxes like these were found close to the figurine

"What we've got is a piece of stone that is largely naturally shaped.

"It has some modifications, but they are more than modifications," Mr Bednarik told BBC News Online.

Mr Bednarik tried to replicate the markings on a similar piece of rock by hitting a stone flake with a "hammerstone" in the manner of a punch. He then compared the microscopic structure of the fractures with those of the Tan-Tan object.

Sceptic's view

However, Professor Stanley Ambrose of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign said he saw no evidence for tool marks and that, although the figure was evocative, it was most likely the result of "fortuitous natural weathering".

"He [Mr Bednarik] has effectively presented all the information necessary to show this is a naturally weathered rock," Professor Ambrose told BBC News Online.

Professor Ambrose points to Mr Bednarik's observation that some rocks in the vicinity of the figure were weathered and even rounded from transport by water. Professor Ambrose believes that rocks and artifacts found at the site could have been disturbed by flowing water in the past.

Mr Bednarik also observes that flecks of a greasy substance containing iron and manganese on the surface of the stone could be red ochre, a substance used as paint by later humans.

"They [the specks] do not resemble corroded natural iron deposits, nor has any trace of this pigment been detected on any of the other objects I have examined from Tan-Tan," writes Mr Bednarik in the paper.

A 200,000-300,000-year-old stone object found at Berekhat Ram in Israel in 1986 has also been the subject of claims that it is a figurine. However, several other researchers later presented evidence that it was shaped by geological processes.

The Tan-Tan object was discovered in 1999, during a dig directed by Lutz Fiedler, the state archaeologist of Hesse in Germany.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiquities; godsgravesglyphs; longliverock; morocco; oldest; robertbednarik; sculpture; stanleyambrose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Flurry
"400,000 B.C." was chiseled in the lower right corner.
21 posted on 05/23/2003 6:21:27 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
OK, I'll bite . . .

How do you know?

<< g >>

22 posted on 05/23/2003 6:23:28 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: almcbean
Oh! Well I guess it's valid then.
23 posted on 05/23/2003 6:23:50 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Maybe 15,000 yrs, not much older if at all.
24 posted on 05/23/2003 6:24:31 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
what? the universe? hmph. go figure.
25 posted on 05/23/2003 6:25:57 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
In what is called young earth creationism the earth is less than 10,000 years old.
26 posted on 05/23/2003 6:27:31 AM PDT by activationproducts (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
It has a little sticker on the bottom that includes a date.
27 posted on 05/23/2003 6:27:41 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: new cruelty
Seriously, I have not come to a belief, I find it a very interesting subject to try to keep an open mind about.
29 posted on 05/23/2003 6:28:43 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Clean_Sweep
"Looks more like a cow teet than a person."

So does Hillary Clinton. Plus, her intellectual capacity is on par with this piece of stone.


30 posted on 05/23/2003 6:30:28 AM PDT by Modernman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon; activationproducts
I believe you are serious and I also find it interesting.
31 posted on 05/23/2003 6:32:57 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blam
Helen Thomas.
32 posted on 05/23/2003 6:37:03 AM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Writing found nearby deciphered: "Holy mackerel dig the a*ss on that broad!"
33 posted on 05/23/2003 6:37:08 AM PDT by evets (Nephilim - Genesis 6:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
One time, Cliff Claven found a potato that looked like Abe Lincoln !
34 posted on 05/23/2003 6:39:44 AM PDT by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I am very serious, I'm not going to say, "This is how I believe and that's it!" I find it easier to consider something like the earth is only 15,000 years than to believe in evolution, humans are not animals, no matter what they tell our kids in the government schools.
35 posted on 05/23/2003 6:40:24 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Are you saying the universe was created 6,000 years ago.

Yes, all of us "fundies" say that. Well, most of us do.

36 posted on 05/23/2003 6:40:54 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
>Wow, 396,000 years before the universe was created.

Hah! You're reading my mind.

I'd have to see this supposed "Venus Figurine" before I coulld attempt a call here but it looks good. Many explainations are possible though. If it was dated via stratigraphic association, ground disturbances coould have misplaced it in the depositions. On the surface, I'd say it's too old. Something's worng.

37 posted on 05/23/2003 6:41:10 AM PDT by Celantro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
For some reason, don't ask how my mind works, I remember a tv sitcom, "Family Affair" maybe.

The kids were playing with clay and somehow, one of their creations gets recognized as "Pre-Columbian" art.

38 posted on 05/23/2003 6:43:05 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk; HankReardon; activationproducts
Very interesting, so where can I read more about this topic?
39 posted on 05/23/2003 6:48:28 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
www.rae.org
40 posted on 05/23/2003 6:52:30 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson