Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
I never said she had a men's handicap.

Earlier someone said that the Sponsor Exemptions have to meet some criteria, saying he thought it is a 2 handicap. I have no knowledge as to what it is.

My point is that the rules were not changed to allow her to play. Existing rules allowed her to get a sponsor exemption. To me, that means she is there by merit. It may not be the same merit as those who played in by qualifying, but it is a legitimate merit as defined in the PGA rules (namely, having some sort of appeal that a sponsor wanted to use an exemption on).
884 posted on 05/22/2003 11:56:46 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
She did not meet the criteria for a sponsor's exemption. She has never won a penny on any men's tour, and she does not have a men's handicap.
887 posted on 05/22/2003 11:58:24 AM PDT by presidio9 (Homophobic and Proud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson