[ethical]

The vote was rigged. On the directions to vote by cell phone or text messaging they gave Reubans number as the example of a contestants number. Also I looked at about 60 newspaper and tv polls around the country today and reuban only led in ONE that I saw. Clay led in virtually all of them and by a good sized margin. No way were that many polls wrong. The numbers you dialed were rigged or certain high Clay vote states were blocked or they just said "let's make it a 13,000 vote difference in Reubans favor."

[Timesink]

The vote was rigged. On the directions to vote by cell phone or text messaging they gave Reubans number as the example of a contestants number.

Funny, I saw them do the same thing for Clay.

Also I looked at about 60 newspaper and tv polls around the country today and reuban only led in ONE that I saw. Clay led in virtually all of them and by a good sized margin. No way were that many polls wrong.

So if Zogby says the night before the election that it's 55-45 in favor of Gore, that means Gore is the winner and Bush stole the election?

Did you know that in 1993, all the way up until election day every single major pollster in Britain predicted a massive landslide for Labour that was going to hand them control of Parliament and toss John Major out on his butt. Then the people actually voted, and the Tories absolutely annihilated Labour. And those were "legitimate, scientific" polls, not online votes and random call-ins like all these local newspaper AI polls. Clay Aiken fans don't know how to freep?