Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Antiwar Republican
Actually I think they said "you're next bee-otch".
40 posted on
05/07/2003 12:06:44 PM PDT by
discostu
(A cow don't make ham)
To: Antiwar Republican
The ideological garbage subtracted what is so bad about what is being said here. The elimination of the Assad-Baath regime in Damascus would bring tears to the eyes of those who are content with Syria being able to keep a substantial part of the IDF permanently tied up covering the nortern frontier. The squelching of the Assad regime and the subsequent demise of Hamas and Hizbollah in Lebanon are cause and effect related actions. The final domino in this sequence is the so called Palestine Authority. Shorn of protectors its ability to continue to orchestrate violence also dries up and the Israelis have more than enough muscle to effectivelt tame Paliland for good. A very tame Pali entity that knows better than to even think of annoying the Israelis would be a pleasant final endstate bring down the curtain on the endless Plai terror war. So what is so bad with this scenario? Except if you want the Arabs to win since you viscerally hate both the US and Israel.
To: Antiwar Republican
Monsieur Raimondo seems to be le petit chien howling at the Moon.
Not a Dog of War, but a Dog of Yap.
To: Antiwar Republican
One of the clues to the somewhat mysterious abuse of the neologism "neocon" is precisely who is abusing it. This is an example. I do not mean that in a kind way.
To: BlackElk
For your amusement
To: Antiwar Republican
So what is the problem? All those groups and the syrian regime are terrorists. Is it wrong to speak the truth, and right to accept lies from terrorists and left wingers? Of course, when north korea acts like a dog, they are not bad guys, we are the bad guys. This article is nothing but communist/terrorist b.s.
59 posted on
05/07/2003 1:18:11 PM PDT by
gedeon3
To: Antiwar Republican
Did Justine get jilted by a boyfriend? Justine ought not to take the name of a patriot and baseball champion like Yogi Berra in vain.
60 posted on
05/07/2003 1:26:13 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Viva Cristo Rey! Sniveling Cowardice delenda est!)
To: Antiwar Republican
EWWW, if being in favor of defending ourselves against those who started this war makes one a neo-con pitbull, then I guess I am one. If you agree with Justin, I'd suggest you should move to France.
63 posted on
05/07/2003 1:34:00 PM PDT by
ohioman
To: Antiwar Republican
After September 11th, 2001, You're either with U.S. or against U.S.!!!! We suffered an attack that day that was more horrific than December 7th, 1941!!!! Socialistic Terrorists are now our targets for destruction!!!! Socialists Nations or entities, that support terrorist states or terrorist entities are not our friends(and will not be trusted), and should be dealt with according to each situation that warrants the appropriate response!!!!
66 posted on
05/07/2003 1:45:55 PM PDT by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Antiwar Republican; Admin Moderator
Hmmmmm, 6 posts since '99, no replies.........
TROLL maybe?
67 posted on
05/07/2003 1:49:43 PM PDT by
ChuckHam
To: Antiwar Republican
Release the Hounds!![](http://www.winchesterstar.com/TheWinchesterStar/021028/hunt7.jpg)
To: Antiwar Republican
Of course, if you scroll up a few articles, Justin, you may find it's not the mad dogs but the Liberal Pigs of War:
Democrat calls on Bush to pressure Syria, Lebanon (John Kerry)
To: Antiwar Republican
After much thought and reflection over the authors viewpoint, it has come to my attention that the point the writer makes here can only lead me to this one conclusion, which occured to me by articles end:
I need more bran.
To: Antiwar Republican
Fisk does this sort of thing so much better. And Fisk knows what a helot was.
To: Antiwar Republican
Justin, are you a Communist?
102 posted on
05/07/2003 9:07:01 PM PDT by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: Antiwar Republican
Yeah. Syria's next.
Not that they have it coming or anything.
Innocent people. All of them. (Right.)
104 posted on
05/07/2003 9:53:41 PM PDT by
BenR2
((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
To: Antiwar Republican
Bump for later, I guess...
105 posted on
05/07/2003 10:00:59 PM PDT by
lorrainer
(Oh, was I ranting? Sorry.....)
To: Antiwar Republican
Ah, the latest from Pravda's favorite American writer and the only homosexual pat buchanan appreciates.
So Justine, does it bother you that more American hating Russians read your articles then American's do? And by the way, are you ever going to tell us just how much Pravda pays you?
To: Antiwar Republican
"Little Lenin" neo con? Perhaps a few lessons in the doctrine of Lenin are needed these days, not to mention Hitler, et al. They were Socialists. Now which party does that sound like?
The war on terrorism was intended to continue from the beginning, as well it should. This was never a secret, the President stated his intentions from the start.
To: Antiwar Republican
There is a song by the Bloodhound Gang called, "I Wish I Was Gay so I Could Get Chicks."
I wanna write a song called, "I Wish I Was a Jew so I Could Be A Neocon."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson