Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Man of Virtues Has a Vice (Bill Bennett gambles)
Newsweek ^ | 1/2/03 | Jonathan Alter and Joshua Green

Posted on 05/02/2003 1:27:57 PM PDT by Callahan

May 2 — In his best-selling anthology, “The Book of Virtues,” William J. Bennett writes: “We should know that too much of anything, even a good thing, may prove to be our undoing…[We] need to set definite boundaries on our appetites.”

DOES BENNETT? The popular author, lecturer and Republican Party activist speaks out, often indignantly, about almost every moral issue except one-gambling. It’s not hard to see why. According to casino documents, Bennett is a “preferred customer” in at least four venues in Atlantic City and Las Vegas, betting millions of dollars over the last decade. His games of choice: video poker and slot machines, some at $500 a pull. With a revolving line of credit of at least $200,000 at each casino, Bennett, former drug czar and Secretary of Education under Presidents Reagan and Bush, doesn’t have to bring money when he shows up at a casino.

(link for full article)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bennett; gambling; williamjbennett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 421-433 next last
To: Texaggie79
Gee, what is his argument against pot legalization?

Political aspirations - which have just been shot to hell - Lol...

341 posted on 05/02/2003 5:21:27 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: discostu
He's a lowlife - no different than some bum who collects change to play the numbers in NYC.
342 posted on 05/02/2003 5:22:39 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
"Not only does he gamble, he gambles stupid.."

I heard on the Larry Elder show this afternoon that Bennett has lost $8,000,000 over the last ten years. If that doesn't hurt...I wonder where he got his money - just an aside.

I go to Vegas a couple of times a year, I have a close friend who lives there, I lose almost every time. My view is: Maybe if they built the Hotel\Casinos out of solid gold, just maybe the visitors would understand...the gamblers lose.

Point being; almost every player loses. Almost certainly almost every regular gambler loses.

343 posted on 05/02/2003 5:27:07 PM PDT by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Absolutely. Bad laws increase lawlessness which increases immorality which damages society as a whole. It really all starts with bad laws. By writing more laws governing more behavior and making more people defacto criminals the cycle gets accelerated.
344 posted on 05/02/2003 5:28:03 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Well let's see the numbers are illegal, and some bum collecting change obviously can't afford his gambling habit. Slots are perfectly legal in AC and Bennett can clearly afford to gamble. No different? Not hardly.
345 posted on 05/02/2003 5:29:36 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I don't see what the big deal is...it's legal and he can afford it. So what?

I've said the same thing about prostitution in certain counties in Nevada.

346 posted on 05/02/2003 5:31:36 PM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (Dieses sieht wie ein Job nach Nothosen aus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Whores are legal in parts of Nevada - is it OK with you if Bill "visits"?
347 posted on 05/02/2003 5:34:15 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
Pooh.

If that was the only vice I had I would be a Saint.

348 posted on 05/02/2003 5:48:25 PM PDT by LibKill (MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek; Positive

LOL! I can hear it now...

"But, President Bennett.. Sir.. Sending Marines to attack Iraq one at a time is a losing strategy. The Joint Chiefs assure me that the odds of succeeding this way are so slim as to be incalculable. You can't even display that many decimal places without scientific notation, they said."

"Screw the odds. Look, the way I got it figured, we have over a million men under arms. One of them has got to hit and when he does, jackpot baby!"

I used to work with a lady who had a gambling addiction. She told me with a straight face that she would sit down, gamble all her money, gamble all her husbands money and then write checks she couldn't cover.

I tried to explain the concept of "odds" to her, I even tried the "hit by lightning" analogy. Un-uh. No dice.

She is convinced that she is like "building up luck" or something by virtue of playing for longer and longer periods... and that she "has to hit" at some point.

I know many people like this and have come to the conclusion that compulsive gamblers cannot be trusted. They are purely emotional creatures who survive on strange rituals, omens and other imagined associations & linkages..

349 posted on 05/02/2003 5:49:38 PM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Sammy to Frodo: "Get out. Go sleep with one of your whores!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
DOES BENNETT? The popular author, lecturer and Republican Party activist speaks out, often indignantly, about almost every moral issue except one-gambling. It’s not hard to see why.

No it isn't hard to see. Gambling obviously doesn't bother him. It doesn't bother a lot of people. If he hasn't spoken out against it what is this article suppose to prove?

350 posted on 05/02/2003 5:51:48 PM PDT by MattAMiller (Iraq was liberated in my name, how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Sinner.
351 posted on 05/02/2003 5:59:39 PM PDT by republicanwizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
This has always interested me. Liberals supposedly believe that morality is simply a social construct. But for many of themyou can see that that does not truly inform their thinking.

There are many people who when they hear someone say "X is bad" protest loudly. This sin't because they think X is neutral or good, it's because condeming X is just too strident. Obviously they haven't been able to divest themselves of whatever moral teachings they were raised with.

I'm an atheist. I was raised in a non-religous home. It's my observation that the people who complain the most about "moralists" come from very religous homes. For all their talk of having risen loftly above "primitive" religion, still feel hell at their heels and just don't like being remined of it.

352 posted on 05/02/2003 6:30:17 PM PDT by MattAMiller (Iraq was liberated in my name, how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Panel 2: Lucky Eddie turns to Hagar and asks, "Is moderation good, Hagar?"

Panel 3: Hagar responds, while lifting his stein again, "If you don't overdo it."

I like that. Actually I hate the expression "everything in moderation."
Moderation,what a dull life to lead. - Tom

353 posted on 05/02/2003 6:49:44 PM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
And sometimes extremes are better than moderation.

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-04-29-4

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/04/030429084013.htm

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993668
354 posted on 05/02/2003 7:01:09 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: ClassicConservative
Gee, when did the issue of "legal" excuse a moral stance? If gambling is inherently immoral, then the issue of legality is moot.

Do you invest in the stock market? That's gambling. Is it morally wrong?

355 posted on 05/02/2003 8:10:03 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: ClassicConservative
Gee, when did the issue of "legal" excuse a moral stance? If gambling is inherently immoral, then the issue of legality is moot.

Do you invest in the stock market? That's gambling. Is it morally wrong?

356 posted on 05/02/2003 8:10:03 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
I really had no idea anyone would still refer to gambling as a vice...in fact, I thought Gambling was now a disease like alcoholism.

Okay, okay...but seriously is this a big deal?

357 posted on 05/02/2003 9:11:58 PM PDT by Katya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Man, I hope and pray this gets HUGE media play this week-end.

Uh, why?

358 posted on 05/02/2003 9:17:26 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
Being as I'm not his wife that's not my call.
359 posted on 05/02/2003 9:21:47 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Gambling addiction and stupidity are two different things. Of course fondness for gambling isn't the same as gambling addiction.
360 posted on 05/02/2003 9:24:24 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 421-433 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson