Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Far right greases skids for GOP fall
Boston Globe ^ | April 25, 2003 | Robert Kuttner

Posted on 04/25/2003 2:15:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:40 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Each, in its own way, reflects the hubris of the far right that dominates this administration.

So, if you don't toe the current moderate line, and actually follow the principles that got your tribe elected, you have "hubris."

If you are a moderate, and sell out your principles, creating a more leftist, socialist society in the process, you are in the right.

What a joke. These guys should be writing the ingredients on dog food labels, not anything that attempts to pretend to be legitimate.

21 posted on 04/25/2003 4:38:49 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Call me Sam" Donaldson

you should win some sort of prize for that one. hilarious. wish i'd come up with it. killer.

22 posted on 04/25/2003 4:40:37 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
When Kuttner claims that Powell is a benign diplomat, "putting a reasonable face on a policy he abhors," he is in effect labeling the Secretary of State a hypocrite, and a callous opportunist.

Kuttner is just peddling the Conventional Wisdom that liberals tell each other. This is the kind of ignorant assertion that masques itself as simple deduction.

Powell understands the wreckage that was left behind by the Clintons, as Robert Kelly attempts to deal with the recalcitrant North Koreans that Bill Clinton thought he had bought off. You'll never get Kuttner to agree with this.

However, bear in mind that Kuttner is writing for a certain audience, liberal activists. These people make up the shock troops that make Democratic activism go. So Kuttner is going to tell them that the "Radical" Bushies are going to inevitably alienate swing voters. To tell them that the Bush Administration was pursuing a strategy designed to attract swing voters to the campaign through tax relief would be to remove all hope from liberalism.

For Kuttner to tell his audience the truth, that the Bush Administration is a lot less radical than he asserts, would be to undermine his whole argument. That doesn't make for good sales of The American Prospect now, does it?

Be Seeing You,

Chris

23 posted on 04/25/2003 4:58:46 AM PDT by section9 (You will all be shot unless you download the Saddam screensaver...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Fantasy from the Boston Globe


24 posted on 04/25/2003 4:59:53 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The leftwing socialist enablers that backed clinton do not understand people on the right that speak up when they have an exception of policy or personnel.

In that vein, most people agree that Powell is a socialist in a republican suit.

25 posted on 04/25/2003 5:07:35 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The skids greased for a fall are the ones greased by the far left that has exposed the Democrat Party as less of a political party than it is a den of organized crime. Did the Globe really think that no one would notice the elephant if they day dream out loud about splits in the Republican Party?

Perhaps they should rename their paper "The Fish Wrapper".

26 posted on 04/25/2003 5:15:03 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The " Far Right ", of course being the centrists in the Party - who, for anyone's information ,share views that most closely correspond to the typical 1950's / early 1960's Democrat !
27 posted on 04/25/2003 5:18:23 AM PDT by genefromjersey (Gettin' too old to "play nice" !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
This is beyond belief. The "radicals" they speak of are the core of the Republican Party. What would be more (or at least somewhat) accurate would be to write that certain policies are uncomfortable for the more liberal or financially conservative Republican Senators. But, a bigger problem is that there is no voice from the administration supporting conservative Senators...first Trent Lott, now Senator Santorum.

I really think a majority of the population would support a strong, consistant, conservative viewpoint. Is this administration trying to position itself differently for the next election?

28 posted on 04/25/2003 5:27:42 AM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
The Bible is most effective when it is used to wave at the cameras when coming out of church the day your mistress is being questioned by a federal attorney.

Excuse me here. But to call ML his "mistress" is to elevate her far beyond her actual status. She was never anything more to him than a sperm recepticle. A mistress has the affection of her lover. ML never had anything like that. The man is incapable of affection (with anyone other than himself, of course).

Just keeping you honest! :o)

29 posted on 04/25/2003 5:39:05 AM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The reliably Republican vote is around 40 percent of the electorate, and the government-bashing, Bible-thumping, nuke-'em far-right electorate is substantially less than that. In the past, moderate Republicans saved this radical administration from itself - on tax and budget issues, on military adventures, and on tolerance issues. ....Now the radicals want nothing less than total victory.

...er...wait...THATS ME!!!!..(Waving arms)...he's talkin about ME...(jumping around the keyboard) Yehaaaaaaaa!

30 posted on 04/25/2003 6:06:16 AM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.cookingwithcarlo.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoggyBottomBoy
Personaly, I think that it is the Boston Globe is doomed.

I was getting it during the War, for my son to access when he returns.

Many of those people at the Globe are seriously out of touch. I let them know what I thought of their ideas concerning journalism a few times too.
31 posted on 04/25/2003 2:20:11 PM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Radix
christians are annoying
32 posted on 05/23/2003 9:17:42 AM PDT by caly_dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson