Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Says Iraqi Weapons May Be Destroyed
AP ^ | Apr. 24, 2003 | RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent

Posted on 04/24/2003 2:37:36 PM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator

Bush Says Iraqi Weapons May Be Destroyed
28 minutes ago
Add Politics - AP to My Yahoo!

By RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent

LIMA, Ohio - President Bush (news - web sites) raised the possibility Thursday that any Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were destroyed before or during the U.S.-led war, suggesting for the first time that coalition troops may come up empty in their search.

Photo
AP Photo


Slideshow


(AP Video)

Special Coverage
Latest news:
· US detains Iraq's Tareq Aziz
AFP - 5 minutes ago
· U.S. Forces Said to Take Custody of Aziz
AP - 8 minutes ago
· Iraq's Aziz in U.S. Custody -U.S. Officials
Reuters - 16 minutes ago
Special Coverage

 

Bush, who is expected to mark the end of hostilities soon, defied much of the world to wage war against Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) in a bid to rid Iraq (news - web sites) of weapons of mass destruction. Iraqi leaders asserted the nation had none, and an intensive search by coalition forces has uncovered no proof so far of chemical or biological weapons or a nuclear weapons program.

"He tried to fool the United Nations (news - web sites) and did for 12 years by hiding these weapons. And so it's going to take time to find them," the president said at the Lima Army Tank Plant. "But we know he had them. And whether he destroyed them, moved them or hid them, we're going to find out the truth."

Senior administration officials began this week to scale back expectations that weapons of mass destruction would be found. Bush's spokesman, Ari Fleischer (news - web sites), said Wednesday that success of the search effort depends "not on finding something by bumping into it" but on information provided by Iraqis who might have been involved in such programs.

A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Bush's remarks were based on information from at least one Iraqi scientist who has led coalition forces to materials used in the production of weapons of mass destruction and who has said some weapons were destroyed before the war, others perhaps afterward.

It is believed that some weapons may have been removed from Iraq, and some probably remain, the official said.

France, Russia and other allies opposed to the war want U.N. inspectors to verify any evidence of weapons uncovered by the United States. The Bush administration has refused, saying coalition forces are more efficient.

Bush did not say how likely it was that weapons had been destroyed, rather than hidden and perhaps soon to be uncovered.

"One thing's for certain, Saddam Hussein no longer threatens America with weapons of mass destruction," he said.

Troops on the ground have searched more than 80 sites that prewar U.S. intelligence judged the most likely hiding places for chemical and biological weapons as well as evidence of an Iraqi nuclear program. After a recent strategy shift, teams are now setting aside the search list and deciding where to go more on the basis of new information from Iraqis.

Bush's remarks came at the end of a politically charged three-city visit to Ohio, one of a dozen or so states that will be closely contested in the 2004 presidential election. Bush hopes to convert his wartime popularity into successes in Congress — particularly with his troubled $726 billion economic package.

Bush hoped to pressure Ohio Sen. George Voinovich (news, bio, voting record), a Republican who derailed the White House tax package by refusing to back cuts of more than $350 billion.

Voinovich briefly greeted Bush at the airport in Dayton but he did not attend the president's speeches nor bow to White House demands.

"I think he knows where I'm at," the senator said of Bush.

The president made his disappointment clear.

"Some in Congress say the plan is too big. Well, it seems like to me they might have some explaining to do. If they agree that tax relief creates jobs, then why are they for a little bitty tax relief package?" Bush said.

Democrats said Bush's plan favors the rich and offers low- and middle-income Americans a few hundred dollars in savings.

 

"For people who need prescription drugs or health insurance, that's a drop in the bucket," Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (news, bio, voting record), D-Ohio, said.

While aides said it was not yet time to declare victory in Iraq, the president nearly jumped the gun.

"We fought a war in Afghanistan (news - web sites), and now we have finished a war," Bush said in North Canton before catching himself and adding, "in the process of finishing a war in Iraq."

Several administration officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they expect commanding Gen. Tommy Franks to declare the hostilities over in a few days, paving the way for a presidential address as early as next week that would wrap up the war.

Separately, Bush plans to travel to Dearborn, Mich., on Monday to discuss the future of a newly liberated Iraq. The Detroit suburb is home to one of the nation's largest Arab communities.

While visiting the Lima plant, Bush put a positive spin on reports that some Iraqi factions do not welcome U.S. troops and that an Iranian-style theocracy may grow to power.

"In Iraq, there's discussion, debate, protest — all the hallmarks of liberty," Bush said. "The path to freedom may not always be neat and orderly, but it is the right of every person and every nation."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: destroyed; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
'not yet' but... maybe soon...

You're correct but again the question beg's the point: What is the definition of "is"?

The administration has left the impression that Saddam had vast quantiies of chemical and biological agents and an incipient nuclear weapons capabilities. Shame on them for going overboard in their UN presentations.

The truth will probably be that he had modest supplies of CBW's and was working feverishly to refine enough fissionable material for a demonstration weapon.

His pursuit of WMD programs was political, not military. Small quantities of each were sufficient to destabilize the US economy and make his regime mouse proof.

61 posted on 04/24/2003 4:01:01 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
"As I remember the real reason was "Regime Change"

The reason given by Bush to us and to the world was that:
1. Saddam had WMD
2. With his WMD Saddam would do bad things to us and his neighbors
3.Therefore regime change was necessary.

If Bush does not find the WMD it is going to be a disaster for him like the phonied up reason for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.
62 posted on 04/24/2003 4:01:06 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
The WMDs are there. How do I know? Because Saddam and his regime didn't commit suicide just for giggles. They had a reason to resist resolution 1441 literally to the death.

Put yourself in Saddam's shoes. If you have WMDs, you want to keep them if possible. You do this by not allowing the UN inspectors to find them. Thus there is a value in not cooperating with the inspectors. This risks an attack by the Americans, but if you can survive, you come out of it with at least some of your stash intact.

On the other hand, if you really don't have WMDs, then there is no value to playing cat-and-mouse with the inspectors. In fact, with the Americans breating down your neck, you want the inspectors to give you a clean bill of health.

Saddam had WMDs. He hid them from the UN so that he could keep them for some future use. He thought that the Americans would back down before going to war. When it became obvious that we wouldn't back down, he thought that he could survive the war, bog us down, and stay in power after a negotiated peace. Had he been correct in either case, he would have kept his WMDs; his gamble would have worked.

So why would he then destroy these weapons? He probably ordered their destruction in areas of Iraq that he expected the Americans to take in battle. By not allowing the US to find these weapons in the areas that they would occupy, he would strengthen his hand at the negotiating table.

Why didn't he just use the weapons? That would have weakened his bargaining position. Also, he expected to survive and remain in power. He didn't want to be the ruler of a poisoned land.

In conclusion, there are stocks of WMDs that Saddam expected to have after the war ended. There may not be much in this last stash, but it's there. Saddam risked his life for these weapons.
63 posted on 04/24/2003 4:06:15 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
"Maybe W didn't attend those briefings. He seems to indicate that he has no idea where they are."

Like when he was asked how long the war was going to last(during the fighting). He would say "as long as it takes" and that may be awhile. He said this even while the tanks were going into Freedom Square. Guess he wasn't at the briefings then too.

64 posted on 04/24/2003 4:20:05 PM PDT by cibco (Xin Loi... Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Go Dub Go
"At one point we were saying Saddam had hundreds of tons of chemical or biological weapons. That would be hard to hide, especially with our surveillance capabilities. Maybe that information came from the forged and fraudulent evidence Colin Powell presented to the UN?"

You're kidding .. right?

Do you think Satelite surveilance works on cloudy days? Do you know how they were proven to have moved around TONS of chemicals after the first Gulf War? That the inspectors proved it?

I don't know what country you lived in during that time, but I saw the satelite evidence we had of them moving stuff around during that time. The Iraqi government did too. That they would then become more savvy at accomplishing these moves does not surprize me.

So I gotta ask this "Are you Scott Ritter?"

Because you sure sound like a Saddam apologist!! It must be very lonely living in your world right about now.

65 posted on 04/24/2003 4:21:41 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife ("CNN - WE report WHEN WE decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
What disaster ? I don't think there is an american alive who didn't feel proud the day the Iraqis were on TV kissing pictures of Bush , saying thank you Mr Bush, thank you. It just looks like sour grapes to keep asking about the WMD when everybody knows he still had them when he threw the UN out in 98.
66 posted on 04/24/2003 4:26:40 PM PDT by John Lenin (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
This is the MOST important quote said in this article. We would ALL be wise to re-read them and remember them. To start saying this President is DONE, is a tad premature. The headline of this article is deceiving and deceptive. Sometimes I think people ONLY read the Titles!

President Bush said: "He tried to fool the United Nations and did for 12 years by hiding these weapons. And so it's going to take time to find them," the president said at the Lima Army Tank Plant. "But we know he had them. And whether he destroyed them, moved them or hid them, we're going to find out the truth."

67 posted on 04/24/2003 4:32:15 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife ("CNN - WE report WHEN WE decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Look I'm happy for the Iraqis. Happy that they're free. However, I also realize this freedom is going to be a time to setup a Shiite theocracy. It will happen. How many times has our government felt it necessary to involve itself in Iraq, either directly or covertly, in the past half century? Five? Six times? History will repeat itself, it always does. And while Hussein was evil, despicable, and yes even a tyrant, I know we're just all going to loovvee the Shiite government to come. They're already out in the streets crying for coalition soldiers to go away. Hussein was in their way of setting up this theocracy, we got rid of him for them, and this is what's more than evidently coming. Oh, there'll be a regime change alright. And not for the better position of Israel either. I'll give 'em five years tops before the bunch of loons join the jihad on Israel
68 posted on 04/24/2003 4:38:00 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
You have to be an old fart to remember this name.

John Beresford Tipton, are you rich?

69 posted on 04/24/2003 4:45:05 PM PDT by itsahoot (Drive SUV's prevent Earth from freezing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Can we recall why Iraq was invaded? Wasn't it because Saddam's WMD were endangering our freedom? If WMDs aren't found... could it mean that Iraq was not posing a danger to our national security? And, if that's the case... why waste 138 Americans and $80 billion?

Exactly. Now, one must believe that Bush and his entire administrative team, along with Tony Blair, who is a liberal socialist at heart, were all willing to take this incredible chance at duping the world, and subject future generations of Americans to possible retaliation, just because they had bee up their ass about SH? Pull out the tinfoil.

70 posted on 04/24/2003 4:48:10 PM PDT by Snerfling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Go Dub Go
"At one point we were saying Saddam had hundreds of tons of chemical or biological weapons. That would be hard to hide, especially with our surveillance capabilities. Maybe that information came from the forged and fraudulent evidence Colin Powell presented to the UN?"

At one point, we weren't "saying" it -- we knew it. And so did the UN.

Recall that the previous generation of weapons inspectors did indeed find and document "tons" of chemical weapons and "gallons" of biologicals. When Clinton pulled them out in November, 1998 (so he could "wag the dog" preceding impeachment), these weapons had not been destroyed.

And the documentation that Iraq furnished in response to #1448 contained no reference to these materials. Nor was any evidence of their destruction ever provided. They simply, and unaccountably, "vanished"...

So, we do know that there were WMD. And there is no evidence of their having been destroyed.

The question now is: what has become of them and who has them? What the question is not: did they ever exist?

71 posted on 04/24/2003 4:52:08 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin; John Beresford Tipton
What disaster ? I don't think there is an american alive who didn't feel proud the day the Iraqis were on TV kissing pictures of Bush , saying thank you Mr Bush, thank you.


Well if there is a disaster, then the Bush bashers and democrats will get their wish and we'll have a democrat President, whoever they nonimate.......

But imo this won't be the issue to determine the next election..... Heck you've got the one issuers on here from AWB, abortion, taxes, economy, budget, immigration... just name it all claiming that their issue is the clincher for the next election.
72 posted on 04/24/2003 4:56:10 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
"John Beresford Tipton, are you rich?"

No, hoping he'd adopt me, the son he never had.
73 posted on 04/24/2003 5:00:00 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Why the US Congress authorized the War on Iraq:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html

Summary- Congress authorized force against Iraq because: 1) Iraq invaded Kuwait 2) Iraq agreed to end support for terrorism and WMD programs as part of cease fire 3) Inspectors forced Iraq to ADMIT they were violating WMD portion of cease fire prior to eviction in '98 4)Congress (in 98) authorized Pres to take action to bring Iraq into compliance 5) Iraq continued to show hostility to US (plot to kill Bush, attacking sorties enforcing UN no-fly zones, etc) 6) Iraq continued to support terrorists 7) Public Law 105-338 expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to change the regime 8) enforce many other UN resolutions on human rights, etc.
74 posted on 04/24/2003 5:16:22 PM PDT by BamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
"It looks more to me that Bush is setting up his critics to go after the bait. This wouldn't be the first for him."

I really want to agree with you. But, the president has nothing to gain and everything to lose if this is his strategy. If they have knowledge they're not sharing...the longer he waits to disclose the information, the more he allows his global critics to attack the veracity of the findings.

I'm beginning to think they won't find the WMD the president defined in his last SOUA.

All I can say is "crap".

75 posted on 04/24/2003 5:28:19 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: deport
What I have yet hear from anyone in the media is no matter what we find out about the WMD, it was the right thing to do. EU/UN appeasement to dictators led to 9/11, not to mention a President who was looking for a ME legacy that turned into a nightmare.
76 posted on 04/24/2003 5:31:04 PM PDT by John Lenin (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
. . . but that video of the Saddam statue coming down and the Iraqi guy pounding on it with a sledgehammer is what everyone will remember.

Based on what I heard last weekend, that was nothing more than a staged event. All the "cheering Iraqis" in that video clip had been brought into Baghdad from the Kurdish region of northern Iraq.

77 posted on 04/24/2003 5:32:55 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

U.S-Led Forces Occupy Baghdad Complex Filled With Chemical Agents
New York Times ^ | 4/24/2003 | JUDITH MILLER

Posted on 04/24/2003 10:42 AM CDT by ArcLight

American-led forces have occupied a vast warehouse complex in Baghdad filled with chemicals where Iraqi scientists are suspected of having tested unconventional agents on dogs within the past year, according to military officers and weapons experts.

The officers and experts declined to comment on the source of the information that led them to the warehouse, given the sensitivity of both the source and current operations.

Weapons experts and officers who have seen the warehouse said it was heavily looted before members of Mobile Exploitation Team Alpha and other allied forces seized and secured it. They described it as filled with broken parts and remnants of equipment consistent with a full-scale laboratory.


78 posted on 04/24/2003 5:37:38 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BamaFan
And now, for Pres Bush's reasons (last post was Congress's reasons):

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030317-7.html

Summary: ditto
79 posted on 04/24/2003 5:41:10 PM PDT by BamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
No need to take my word for it. Just read the article.

He tried to fool the United Nations (news - web sites) and did for 12 years by hiding these weapons. And so it's going to take time to find them," the president said at the Lima Army Tank Plant. "But we know he had them. And whether he destroyed them, moved them or hid them, we're going to find out the truth."
80 posted on 04/24/2003 5:51:50 PM PDT by Hillary? Hell no!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson