Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bills would reduce drug penalties
Houston Chronicle ^ | April 13, 2003 | RACHEL GRAVES

Posted on 04/14/2003 10:01:14 AM PDT by MrLeRoy

Alarmed at a trend that is filling state jails with people caught with less than a sugar packet-size amount of an illegal substance, some Texas legislators are pushing to change the law so more drug offenders get treatment instead of incarceration.

Lawmakers who believe Texas' criminal justice system is overly harsh are using the state's $10 billion budget crisis as an opportunity to call for saving money by putting fewer people in prison. Others are skeptical about whether the changes are needed.

One proposal to lessen the punishment for small-time drug offenses is heading for the House floor in the next couple of weeks, and another is pending in a House committee.

"We went through a period of criminalizing just about everything you could think of and raising penalties," said state Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Houston, sponsor of one of the bills. "We may have gone a little bit too far in some cases."

Both bills aim to reduce the number of people locked up for such crimes, require treatment for drug addicts, and keep those caught with small amounts of drugs from being saddled with a felony conviction that could impair their ability to get jobs or rent apartments.

The Houston Chronicle reported last fall that nearly half of the 15,000 inmates in the state jail system -- lower-security jails established in 1994 to house nonviolent felons -- were there for drug crimes involving less than 1 gram.

The bulk of those offenders -- 49 percent -- were from Harris County. The county accounts for 16 percent of Texas' total population.

Of the 58,000 drug convictions won by local prosecutors over the past five years, 77 percent involved less than 1 gram, according to a Chronicle analysis of district court data. Harris County sent 35,000 of the small-time offenders to jail or prison.

Drug cases also make up an increasing proportion of Harris County's felony cases. The number of drug cases before the courts has increased 300 percent since 1985, while the total number of felonies has increased by 56 percent, according to data from Republican state District Judge Jan Krocker.

Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal last week defended the incarceration record.

"They don't appreciate what's going on here," he said of critics. "I see judges giving them (offenders) chance after chance after chance to stay on probation, and apparently they're not doing it."

A bill sponsored by Rep. Ray Allen, R-Grand Prairie, would remove jail time as an option for first-time offenders who are convicted on less-than-a-gram charges. Instead, convicts would be sentenced to probation and treatment programs.

If they then violate their probation or commit multiple offenses, convicts could be sentenced to a state jail.

Rosenthal, a Republican, asked why convicts need several chances at probation and treatment before they receive jail time.

Though less-than-a-gram convictions would still be felonies under Allen's bill, offenders who successfully complete their sentences would have the conviction "set aside." That means they could answer "no" when asked on job and rental applications whether they have felony convictions, but the offenses could still be used against them legally if they commit other crimes.

"We don't want to take the ability of someone to be gainfully employed and be a law-abiding citizen," said Scott Gilmore, Allen's chief of staff.

Rosenthal is concerned the "set aside" system would be unworkable in the courts.

Dutton's bill would reduce drug offenses involving less than a gram from felonies to misdemeanors. The change would lower the penalty structure and shift the crimes from state district courts to misdemeanor courts run by the counties.

"Let's don't put them in prison," he said, adding that drug addiction should be treated as a medical rather than a criminal problem.

As the Legislature grapples with slashing social programs and trimming other costs to address a $10 billion budget deficit, both bills seek to save money by jailing fewer people.

A financial analysis of Allen's bill by the Legislative Budget Board predicts it would save Texas $7 million next year and $72 million by 2007. Dutton's bill, the board claims, would save $35 million next year and $144 million by 2008.

"We need to really think about how we're spending limited funding," said Will Harrell, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas. "In no area of public policy can it be business as usual."

Harrell is lobbying for many of the 31 prison reform bills introduced this session in hopes that lawmakers who are not ready to "rethink the philosophy of crime and punishment" will consider "efficiencies" because of the budget crunch.

Allen's bill won a favorable recommendation Thursday from the Corrections Committee, which he chairs, and will likely be taken up by the full House in the next couple of weeks. Dutton's bill remains in the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee.

If the bills pass the House, they will likely go to the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, headed by John Whitmire, D-Houston.

Traditionally a supporter of prison reform, Whitmire is skeptical that this year's proposals can pass a Republican-led Legislature.

"I just don't think it's realistic that we're going to change the penalty structure ... because of the makeup of the Legislature," he said. "I do think that it is reasonable and tough and smart to find alternatives to incarceration for low-level drug offenders."

Whitmire said a better avenue for reform might be opening a drug court in Harris County, a move that was mandated by the Legislature two years ago.

Whitmire and other lawmakers expressed impatience that the court has not yet opened.

The court will open Sept. 1, which Rosenthal said is the deadline set by the new law. He added that securing federal funding for the court has been slow work.

Meanwhile, the impact of Harris County's aggressive prosecution of low-level drug crimes is felt most harshly in black neighborhoods. The Chronicle analysis showed that 62 percent of those convicted were black and 37 percent were white. It was not possible to tell how many were Hispanic.

Harris County's population is 42 percent Anglo, 33 percent Hispanic and 18 percent black.

Rosenthal offered no explanation for why blacks feel the brunt of drug laws.

"I don't know that I know why the numbers are like that," he said. "It's certainly not an intentional thing."

Rep. Joe Deshotel, chairman of the Legislative Black Caucus, said in a recent opinion article in the Chronicle that the high incarceration rates of blacks show "ineffective public policies and deep-seeded and disturbing attitudes toward people of color in our state."

"Regardless of a person's ethnic background, if they can be rehabilitated ... we should intervene and help that person become a productive citizen," Deshotel, D-Beaumont, said in an interview.

Houston Ministers Against Crime, a group of black ministers, is lobbying for both bills.

Changing the law would make it easier for former drug users to improve their lives, said the Rev. F.N. Williams of Antioch Baptist Church, president of the group.

"They can find some respectable jobs," he said.

Republican state District Judge Michael T. McSpadden has been saying for months that less-than-a-gram offenses overwhelm his and other district courtrooms, detracting from the courts' handling of violent crime, on which he believes they should be focusing.

"I still think the better avenue would be to reduce them to misdemeanor offenses where they belong," McSpadden said last week. "I don't think the lawmakers realize that they absolutely flood the district court dockets."

But others, including the Texas Conference of Urban Counties and the Texas District and County Attorneys Association, think changing minor drug offenses to misdemeanors could prove unwieldy.

Don Lee, executive director of the urban counties group, said he fears that if drug crimes become misdemeanors, counties will get stuck with the bill for jail time that is now paid for by the state.

"Felonies are traditionally a state responsibility," he said. "It is important to counties that we maintain that distinction."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2003 10:01:14 AM PDT by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list; jmc813
Wod_list ping
2 posted on 04/14/2003 10:01:38 AM PDT by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 04/14/2003 10:05:22 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Hang all drug pushers!
They are all scum!
4 posted on 04/14/2003 10:05:40 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ( clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Wouldn't make a difference. Dealers now face an imminent threat of death---the harshest possible punishment---from competitors or twitchy customers, yet they continue dealing, and when one dies or is arrested another springs up to take his place.
5 posted on 04/14/2003 10:11:46 AM PDT by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Well actually you can thank the War on Drugs for making it one of the most profitable businesses in the World. No real cost to start up; no license to worry about, and the overhead is essentially pretty low. Shoot it makes more sense than real-estate.
6 posted on 04/14/2003 10:14:57 AM PDT by Richard Roma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
I've spent time in jail on a few occassions.

Drug users just "dry out" while in jail and immediatly go back on drugs when they get out.

Many times, druggies "hook up" in jail with dealers, other junkies, and so forth. I've even seen prisoners shoot up heroin in the bathroom (sharing needles!) in jail.

IMO, jail doesn't work for drug users. It does keep them off of the street, but it really doesn't solve the problem.

IMO, instead of jail, put them on FORCED detox medicine. Something like Anabuse, so if they use drugs they will get violently ill. It will force them to quit. It will save tons of money in terms of "3 hots and a cot".
7 posted on 04/14/2003 10:17:07 AM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
8 posted on 04/14/2003 10:19:23 AM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Hang all drug pushers! They are all scum!

Define drug pusher.

9 posted on 04/14/2003 10:23:01 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Look at who is supporting this bill. Then look at who is opposing it.

See a pattern here?
10 posted on 04/14/2003 10:25:28 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
IMO, instead of jail, put them on FORCED detox medicine.

Should we also do this to users of the deadly addictive drug alcohol?

11 posted on 04/14/2003 10:32:25 AM PDT by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
A drug pusher is one who gives drugs to minors or
one who sells drugs.
12 posted on 04/14/2003 10:33:33 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ( clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
or one who sells drugs.

You mean like a clerk at a 7-11, or are you specifically talking about pharmacists?

14 posted on 04/14/2003 10:37:54 AM PDT by zeugma (If you use microsoft products, you are feeding the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
A drug pusher is one who gives drugs to minors or one who sells drugs.

I've only met a few drug dealers and the only ones I have ever seen give or sell illict drugs to minors were other minors. So your statement means you advocate hanging children.

Death for giving a friend pot. Good advertisement for what passes as conservatism on this site.

15 posted on 04/14/2003 10:50:50 AM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Look at who is supporting this bill. Then look at who is opposing it. See a pattern here?

From the article...

A bill sponsored by Rep. Ray Allen, R-Grand Prairie, would remove jail time as an option for first-time offenders who are convicted on less-than-a-gram charges.

What pattern might you be referring to?
16 posted on 04/14/2003 10:51:20 AM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I think you fail to appreciate the scale of the situation.
17 posted on 04/14/2003 10:54:43 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Richard Roma
And no taxes. :p
18 posted on 04/14/2003 10:55:25 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
There was also some research a couple of years ago on drugs that prevent the pleasurable effects of cocaine and heroin.
19 posted on 04/14/2003 10:56:40 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
"Should we also do this to users of the deadly addictive drug alcohol?"

If they're a menace to others when drunk, sure. I think the standard should be harm.

If someone is sitting in their living room and intoxicating themselves and watching cartoon network, leave them alone. The standard should be when they're driving intoxicated or otherwise harrasing or commiting any other crimes while intoxicated.

Show no mercy to those people. Lock them up and throw away the key.
20 posted on 04/14/2003 10:58:37 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson