Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The News We (CNN) Kept To Ourselves [must read]
The New York Times ^ | 04/11/03 | EASON JORDAN

Posted on 04/10/2003 9:16:06 PM PDT by Pokey78

ATLANTA — Over the last dozen years I made 13 trips to Baghdad to lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders. Each time I visited, I became more distressed by what I saw and heard — awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff.

For example, in the mid-1990's one of our Iraqi cameramen was abducted. For weeks he was beaten and subjected to electroshock torture in the basement of a secret police headquarters because he refused to confirm the government's ludicrous suspicion that I was the Central Intelligence Agency's Iraq station chief. CNN had been in Baghdad long enough to know that telling the world about the torture of one of its employees would almost certainly have gotten him killed and put his family and co-workers at grave risk.

Working for a foreign news organization provided Iraqi citizens no protection. The secret police terrorized Iraqis working for international press services who were courageous enough to try to provide accurate reporting. Some vanished, never to be heard from again. Others disappeared and then surfaced later with whispered tales of being hauled off and tortured in unimaginable ways. Obviously, other news organizations were in the same bind we were when it came to reporting on their own workers.

We also had to worry that our reporting might endanger Iraqis not on our payroll. I knew that CNN could not report that Saddam Hussein's eldest son, Uday, told me in 1995 that he intended to assassinate two of his brothers-in-law who had defected and also the man giving them asylum, King Hussein of Jordan. If we had gone with the story, I was sure he would have responded by killing the Iraqi translator who was the only other participant in the meeting. After all, secret police thugs brutalized even senior officials of the Information Ministry, just to keep them in line (one such official has long been missing all his fingernails).

Still, I felt I had a moral obligation to warn Jordan's monarch, and I did so the next day. King Hussein dismissed the threat as a madman's rant. A few months later Uday lured the brothers-in-law back to Baghdad; they were soon killed.

I came to know several Iraqi officials well enough that they confided in me that Saddam Hussein was a maniac who had to be removed. One Foreign Ministry officer told me of a colleague who, finding out his brother had been executed by the regime, was forced, as a test of loyalty, to write a letter of congratulations on the act to Saddam Hussein. An aide to Uday once told me why he had no front teeth: henchmen had ripped them out with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss. Again, we could not broadcast anything these men said to us.

Last December, when I told Information Minister Muhammad Said al-Sahhaf that we intended to send reporters to Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq, he warned me they would "suffer the severest possible consequences." CNN went ahead, and in March, Kurdish officials presented us with evidence that they had thwarted an armed attack on our quarters in Erbil. This included videotaped confessions of two men identifying themselves as Iraqi intelligence agents who said their bosses in Baghdad told them the hotel actually housed C.I.A. and Israeli agents. The Kurds offered to let us interview the suspects on camera, but we refused, for fear of endangering our staff in Baghdad.

Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.

I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me. Now that Saddam Hussein's regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.

Eason Jordan is chief news executive at CNN.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4thestate5thcolumn; biasmeanslayoffs; blameamericafirst; cablenewsnetwork; ccrm; censorship; chickennoodlenews; clintonnewsnetwork; cnn; cnnajoke; cnnbloodonhands; cnncoconspirator; cnndeception; cnndictators; cnnkeptquiet; cnnknew; cnnlied; cnnlies; coverup; deathsquads; easonjordan; enemedia; genevaconvention; hateamericafirst; iraq; iraqhistory; iraqifreedom; lamestreammedia; leakbeforediscovery; liars; liberalbias; liberalmedia; mediabias; neverforget; reportersuberotrture; rush; saddam; secretpolice; selfcensorship; torture; trysellingthetruth; uday; war; warcrime; warcrimes; wedontreportthat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,561 next last
To: N. Theknow
You can ask him...

Eason.Jordan@turner.com
501 posted on 04/11/2003 6:00:15 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I already did.

My post was a copy of the email I sent him.

502 posted on 04/11/2003 6:01:32 AM PDT by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Having read this just now, I'm sorry if I post a duplicate thought, but why would CNN feel they needed a Baghdad operation if they couldn't even report the news they got there? As anyone knows, by omitting unfavorable news about the Iraqi regime, CNN was a de facto propaganda organ of Saddam Hussein. This is reprehensible; possibly as large a crime as many perpetrated by the Iraqis themselves.
503 posted on 04/11/2003 6:03:12 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow
lol...

His mailbox must be filling up today.
504 posted on 04/11/2003 6:03:51 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Tell him. He needs to know what people think.

Eason.Jordan@turner.com
505 posted on 04/11/2003 6:04:58 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
So when will Wolf Blitzer start beating Saddam's picture with his shoe?
506 posted on 04/11/2003 6:07:16 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diamond6
Excuse me for offering a dissenting view, but just what would you have done that would have saved the employees from being tortured or killed?

CLOSE THE BUREAU as soon as possible, and stop airing ANY material from it immediately.

507 posted on 04/11/2003 6:09:14 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Henk
I accuse CNN of being complicit in the torture of these people by cooperating with Iraqi authorities just so they could get a camera into Iraq.

It is too late too come clean. They are as guilty as the regime if they knew this was happening and still prostrated themselves just to get a story. Pokey, I agree 100% and this bears repeating.

CNN cares more about having a Baghdad office than they care about people. Pathetic!

508 posted on 04/11/2003 6:10:32 AM PDT by handy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Hmmm. Sounds more to me like this person from CNN might be afraid for himself, and too gutless to take the information people gave him to the proper people. Also, that he was afraid that if word got out about torture of CNN employees, that no one would ever want to work for them and they might miss out on a story and chance to suck up to the regime; that CNN might get booted from the country for not sucking up to the regime; that CNN wanted to suck up to the regime all along and really didn't give a rat's butt about the people.

This part is classic:

(snip)Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.

Strictly out of curiousity, how come he couldn't reveal what the regime had done to a KUWAITI who is already dead anyway? Why wait 12 years to tell that tale while liberal media tried to downplay everything Saddam Hussein's loyalists and palestinian collaborators had done to Kuwaitis? She was dead anyway- she couldn't be tortured any more. Kuait was freed. So why hide it?

It's one thing to try to protect people, quite another to suck up to evil as CNN has done for so long and then years later pretend you were concerned.

509 posted on 04/11/2003 6:11:24 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Glenn Beck discussing this article right now (09:11 EDT).
510 posted on 04/11/2003 6:11:37 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; knighthawk; Ernest_at_the_Beach; thinden; Fred Mertz; Wallaby; honway; JudgeAmint
This article is likely to leave many feeling nauseated, but it must be read. Even though many of us knew CNN wasn't on the U.S. side, I think some will be shocked at the degree of collaboration revealed in this piece. And that is what it is: CNN collaborated with an enemy that rivals Hitler in the sheer level of atrocities. Shame, shame on these "people."
511 posted on 04/11/2003 6:13:38 AM PDT by MizSterious ("The truth takes only seconds to tell."--Jack Straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Is it possible, that there is evidence being found by the troops about the reporters, and the reporters are afraid of it leaking? Or is that too tinfoilish?

I wouldn't say it's tinfoil territory to be suspect - you should ALWAYS be suspect of anything they say - but I do disagree that reporters in general would hush it up. There's too much competition, and too much bad blood between the various news organizations - for any of them to pass up a chance to make another organization look bad.

512 posted on 04/11/2003 6:13:49 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I hardly ever post without reading through all the replies first, but I am just horrified. I'm sure that I am repeating what 100 other folks have already said.

Does this story mean that CNN *KNEW* that Iraqis and others were being tortured by the Iraqi government and CNN didn't tell anybody? Just so that they could keep their cameras in Iraq?!?

I know this guy says that it was because he feared for others' lives, but that's bullpucky. If you KNOW that your Baghdad reporters may be hurt if you report that the government is torturing people, the appropriate response is to get your reporters out of Baghdad and then TELL THE FREEPING STORY!!!

Maybe I am overreacting (and everyone should feel free to tell me so), but this seems so sick to me.
513 posted on 04/11/2003 6:17:37 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
So what does this tell us about what's going on in CNN's Havana bureau -- right this minute!?

Damn good question! What about the other third-world hell-holes run by tin-horn dictators that CNN always seems to have a field office? What about them?

514 posted on 04/11/2003 6:18:31 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: *CCRM; *Lamestream Media; MEDIANEWS
BUMP
515 posted on 04/11/2003 6:25:02 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Total loss of moral authority. CNN knew of the murder, torture and unspeakable acts committed by this regime. Yet they made the conscious determination to NOT report these things so they could continue to "lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders".

Their public reporting did NOTHING to stop the atrocities. In fact, their public acquiescence to the regime's demands CONTINUED the atrocities.

CNN reported the official Iraqi propoganda - There is no human rights violations, there is no WMD program.

CNN KNEW this was a lie YET NEVER REPORTED THE DETAILS THEY K-N-E-W TO BE TRUE!

Did it never occur to CNN to get their employees OUT of Iraq and report the truth to the world?

It is crystal clear that CNN made a concious decision to NOT REPORT the torture and killings so that they could have the prestige of being the number one news presence in Iraq.

I hope the blood of hundred's of thousands of dead Iraqis weighs on the minds of the CNN personnel every night as they lay in bed wondering, "What if.....?".

516 posted on 04/11/2003 6:30:10 AM PDT by Bryan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
The story you wrote about.

Grim, but Iraq is not the only country whose politics is based upon paranoia, desperation and hate. We're just not going to get away with ignoring these problems anymore.

I think we're in for a real challenge and it's not going to be fun. And it's certainly not going to be cheap. We'll see what we're really made of when those of us who aren't in the military are asked to make some sacrifices.

It sure would be nice if we weren't so inclined to tear ourselves to pieces over these problems but, you know, that seems to be what a lot of people on both sides want to do right now.

517 posted on 04/11/2003 6:31:50 AM PDT by Scenic Sounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
CNN ran the story this morning with Eason himself answering questions from Paula. I guess he read some of his email.

Not that I am defending or attacking CNN here... I am too shocked to do either.

But, the way I read the article it does not say whether they told people or not, just that they could not report on it for fear of the lives of many people who work for them, Iraqi citizens included.

As a few others have stated, if CNN was aware of these things happening, others probably were as well...what was the comment way back? "Journalism is a cesspool" or something like that.
518 posted on 04/11/2003 6:32:32 AM PDT by birdwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Henk
I accuse CNN of being complicit in the torture of these people by cooperating with Iraqi authorities just so they could get a camera into Iraq.

I agree. They are news journalists. Stalinism depends on silence and the re-writing of history.
519 posted on 04/11/2003 6:33:16 AM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
New CNN catch-phrase...

We report, we select, we decide, you think what we want you to.
520 posted on 04/11/2003 6:35:35 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,561 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson