Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missile Technology Plant Moved to China
Scott Wheeler ^ | March 4, 2003 | Insight

Posted on 03/31/2003 8:24:10 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN

Missile Technology Plant Moved to China By Scott Wheeler Insight on the News | March 4, 2003

An important U.S. high-tech manufacturer is shutting down its American operations, laying off hundreds of workers and moving sophisticated equipment now being used to make critical parts for smart bombs to the People's Republic of China [PRC], Insight has learned.

Indianapolis-based Magnequench Inc. has not yet publically announced the closing of its Valparaiso, Ind., factory, but Insight has confirmed that the company will shut down this year and relocate at least some of its high-tech machine tools to Tianjin, China. Word of the shutdown comes as the company is producing critical parts for the U.S. Joint Direct Attack Munition [JDAM] project, more widely known as smart bombs, raising heavy security issues related to the transfer of military technology to the PRC. The factory uses rare earths to produce sintered neodymium-iron-boron permanent magnets that have many industrial applications but are essential to the servos critical to precision-guided munitions. According to documents obtained by Insight, Magnequench UG currently is producing thousands of the rare-earth magnets for "SL Montevideo Tech," a Minnesota-based manufacturer of servos. That company confirmed to Insight that it holds a Department of Defense [DoD] contract to produce the high-tech motors for the precision-guided JDAM.

The Valparaiso-based manufacturer, originally known as UGIMAG, became Magnequench UG when it was acquired by Magnequench Inc. in August 2000. Magnequench Inc. had been purchased in 1995 by a consortium that included the China-based San Huan New Materials and Hi-Tech Co., created and at least partially owned by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Magnequench was a spin-off company of General Motors Corp. [GM], and at the time of the buyout was headquartered in Anderson, Ind.

Clyde South was a negotiator for the United Auto Workers Local 662 representing the workers at Magnequench when the consortium began negotiating to buy the company in 1995. In an interview with Insight, South says that worker concern about PRC influence over the consortium led to an "agreement with GM" that the plant would remain in Anderson for at least 10 years According to South, the buyers made the same agreement with the union, but since he had doubts about their intentions he took his concerns to Washington. Warnings fell on deaf ears. In August 2001, the sixth year of the 10-year agreement, South's distrust was validated when the consortium's managers "told us they intend to close the plant" and eliminate roughly 400 jobs.

The Magnequench plant in Anderson transforms neodymium, iron and boron into powder using a unique patented process that produces the exotic rare-earth magnets. Following the buyout in 1995, the production line at Anderson was "duplicated in China" at a facility built by the PRC company. According to South, after the company "made sure that it worked, they shut down" the Anderson facility. South says he suspects the buyout was about getting the technology, adding, "I believe the Chinese entity wanted to shut the plant down from the beginning. They are rapidly pursuing this technology."

Meanwhile, says the union negotiator, "They told us, 'We are going bankrupt,'" and therefore had to close the Anderson facility. This was not long after the consortium purchased UGIMAG in Valparaiso, according to critics, telling the workers there that they planned to keep the factory running. But, according to some sources, Magnequench Inc. had "refused to buy the buildings or the property" on which the factory was located, "suggesting a temporary arrangement." South said of his experience, "You just couldn't believe anything they told you."

The plant workers at Magnequench UG are organized by the United Steelworkers of America. Insight contacted union official Michael O'Brien, who confirmed negotiations with Magnequench UG regarding the company's future, but declined to comment further.

The transfer to Communist China of technologies that make rare-earth permanent magnets also is a matter of concern for defense and national-security experts, says Peter Leitner, a senior strategic-trade adviser to the DoD. Leitner says rare-earth magnets "lie at the heart of many of our most advanced weapons systems, particularly rockets, missiles and precision-guided weapons such as smart bombs and cruise missiles." He tells Insight why the PRC's need for this type of technology is urgent, noting that "China has an ongoing high-priority effort to produce a long-range cruise missile. They are trying to replicate the capabilities the U.S. has, such as with the Tomahawk [cruise missile], as part of their power projection, and expanding their ability to strike targets at long distances."

Since the 1995 buyout of Magnequench by the consortium of two Chinese companies and a cooperating U.S. firm, it has in turn bought at least two more high-tech companies that deal in rare-earth magnets. In addition to UGIMAG in 2000, which became Magnequench UG, it has bought GA Powders, which was a spin-off company of the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, a U.S. national lab. An insider tells Insight that "Magnequench UG is the last American company making these rare-earth magnets. When it moves to China, there are none left." Leitner sees a pattern. He says the Chinese "have targeted the manufacturing process through a variety of suspicious business activities and have been furiously transferring the manufacturing technology to China, thereby becoming the only source. They are purchasing U.S. companies, shutting them down and transferring them to China."

According to Leitner, "The Chinese are clearly trying to monopolize the world supply of rare-earth materials such as neodymium that are essential to the production of the militarily critical magnets that enable precise guidance and control of our most advanced weapons and aircraft." He warns that risks are involved in allowing this kind of technology transfer, adding: "By controlling the access to the magnets and the raw materials they are composed of, U.S. industry in general and the auto industry in particular can be held hostage to PRC blackmail and extortion in an effort to manipulate our foreign and military policy. This highly concentrated control - one country, one government - will be the sole source of something critical to the U.S. military and industrial base."

Intelligence analysts emphasize that the PRC routinely combines espionage operations with business deals. Internal PRC documents refer to this as advancing "economy and i national-defense construction." A 1999 congressional report on PRC espionage states that the Beijing government sees "providing civilian cover for military-industrial companies to acquire dual-use technology through purchase or joint-venture business dealings" as a responsibility of the government. The report lists "rare-earth metals ... for military aircraft and other weapons" as one of the primary targets of the PRC.

So how could this be happening? Because of the PRC's involvement in the 1995 buyout of Magnequench, the deal required the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States [CFIUS], which is chaired by the secretary of the Treasury. CFIUS approval of the buyout predated a series of reports by the FBI and congressional committees warning of massive PRC espionage efforts against U.S. businesses and military technology. In one case, which involved the then-struggling McDonnell Douglas Corp., the China National Aero-Technology Import and Export Corp. [CATIC] targeted the U.S. aircraft giant's plant at Columbus, Ohio, according to government sources. Plant 85, as it was known, is where the bodies of the U.S. Air Force C-17 strategic transport plane and the MX intercontinental ballistic missile were made.

In 1994, CATIC made an offer to buy Plant 85 and relocate it to what was to be a civilian aircraft-production facility, according to government documents. The request for an export license for the plant's machine tools touched off a bitter feud among export-control officials at the DoD that still lingers nine years later. Those opposed to the sale argued that once the Plant 85 machine tools were exported to the PRC, they would be used to produce missiles for China's People's Liberation Army [PLA]. Those who favored the sale pointed to the ancillary deal the PRC dangled in front of McDonnell Douglas to purchase more than $1 billion worth of aircraft.

In the end, those in favor of the sale of Plant 85 won out and those opposed almost immediately were vindicated. According to government documents, within months of exporting the plant to China, U.S. officials learned that the sensitive machine tools had been diverted for use in a Chinese factory that makes the Silkworm missile that Beijing has provided to rogue nations. United Auto Workers union official South tells Insight he sees similarities between the cases of McDonnell Douglas and Magnequench, noting that immediately after the consortium's first Magnequench acquisition, "They transferred the patented jet-casting process to China."

In an interview with Insight, Magnequench Inc. President Archibald Cox Jr. initially denied but later confirmed having a contract for the production of rare-earth magnets for the JDAM. When asked about the shutdown of the Anderson plant last year, he acknowledged having a 10-year agreement with GM and the steelworkers, but insists that despite the early termination of that agreement the workers "got a fair deal" when the company bought out their contract. Cox tells Insight the closing of the Valparaiso plant was a matter of economics, and denies that the company is moving equipment to China.

"We are going to sell everything in the plant i unless we can use it somewhere else," says Cox. Insight has obtained evidence that "somewhere else" may mean China. A copy of an internal memo from the Valparaiso plant seems to contradict the "sell or auction" option. A brief memo, dated Jan. 23, states in part, "In the near future you will be seeing people in the plant performing measurements and a variety of estimating and planning activities in preparation for equipment sale and/or removal ... to give the company an idea of cost and logistics." According to eyewitness accounts, all such "people have been from China." Cox also acknowledges that Magnequench Inc. did not purchase the buildings or land where the Valparaiso plant is located, but refuses to characterize reluctance on the company's part: "It just wasn't part of the deal," Cox says.

And, Cox insists, "China is already selling the same products for less money."

A source with detailed and specific information about the internal operations of the company tells Insight that "the company set up their own competitors by transferring the machines and technology to China. Once the Chinese companies bought into Magnequench, they created their own competition."

According to company officials, Mangnequench asked for and received clearance to export equipment it has shipped to the PRC.

Meanwhile, employees of Magnequench UG have placed their hope in an unlikely labor-union ally. The one surefire deterrent to Magnequench UG's move to China would be for President George W. Bush to exercise his authority under the 1988 Exon-Florio amendment to the Defense Production Act and order San Huan New Materials to divest its holdings in this strategic U.S. company. In his State of the Union Address, the president offered a glimmer of hope for Magnequench employees by declaring his administration's intent to "strengthen global treaties banning the production and shipment of missile technologies." If so, say the workers, this may be a very good place to begin the process.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: china; missile; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 03/31/2003 8:24:10 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
Yeeeeeeeeah, like this isn't a conflict with national security. WTF is wrong with this country?
2 posted on 03/31/2003 8:25:16 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
This has X42's fingerprints all over it.
3 posted on 03/31/2003 8:26:56 PM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (This just in: The left wing media lies! In other news, the sun rose in the east today...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
hmmm, he didn't exactly leave mark his presence with fingerprints, exclusively -- ala Monica's blue dress -- ICK
4 posted on 03/31/2003 8:28:51 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
As non-Western civilizations continue to gain more prominence on the global stage, their financial and military presence becomes more obvious. China and other Oriental nations are perfect examples of a new economic force, while North Korea’s threats to expand their nuclear arsenal reveal a new player in the game.

The problem in regard to the United States is that we are being deliberately set-up to take a fall.

How do I arrive at this conclusion? One of the major indicators that rarely get mentioned in the media is the way in which we use our resources. What do we do with the billions of dollars raised through taxation of the American people? Do we use it to strengthen our borders, prop-up our industrial base, and reinforce our infrastructure to be the best in the world? No,

our political leaders (guided by their New World Order puppet-masters) are sending more and more of it outside our borders via foreign aid, foreign weapons build-ups, and as enormous payoffs to foreign nations for the use of their military bases (Turkey is a perfect example).

5 posted on 03/31/2003 8:29:40 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
Time to call for Blix.
6 posted on 03/31/2003 8:30:44 PM PST by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
This is happening because the liberals have taxed and regulated them out of business.
7 posted on 03/31/2003 8:33:24 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
The U.S. government has thrown open our borders to potential Iraqi terrorists disguised as refugees.

On the eve of war with Iraq, federal agents swept through the country in pursuit of suspected Iraqi and al-Qaeda "sleeper cells" — small groups of saboteurs waiting orders to commit terrorist acts.

According to the March 5th Los Angeles Times, U.S. intelligence officials had "credible information" that Iraqi terrorist cells had been dispatched around the globe. "The concern is not that there is a credible Iraqi military threat," commented one official. "We are concerned about the increased likelihood of terrorist attacks."

NBC News reported on March 6th: "The FBI is conducting an intensive hunt for potential ‘sleeper cells’ of Iraqi agents planted to strike in the event of war.... At least 70 Iraqi nationals are under active surveillance … and agents have spread out to interview thousands of Iraqi men in an attempt to track down hundreds who came to the United States and disappeared."

This sweep actually began in January, as FBI agents fanned out to interrogate an estimated 50,000 Iraqis residing in the United States. Aziz al-Taee, chairman of the Iraqi-American Council, reported that the FBI was "asking if anybody knows someone who worked with Saddam. They asked about a list of some who have vanished. They are asking about terrorist cells."

Many or even most of the estimated 300,000 Iraqi-Americans and resident aliens are law-abiding people who fled Saddam’s brutal reign, which UN sanctions have exacerbated by targeting the civilian population while leaving the dictator unmolested. It is reasonable to believe, however, that Saddam’s intelligence apparatus seeded that population with terrorists as a way of retaliating against the U.S., should the Gulf War resume.

In fact, we know for certain that the Iraqi refugee population contains highly trained assets of the Iraqi military, including the vaunted Republican Guard. We know this because Washington brought them here.

At the end of the first Gulf War in 1991, the first Bush administration began a program, which the Clinton administration continued, to resettle thousands of Iraqi POWs in the United States at taxpayer expense. "According to the State Department, the former prisoners were conscripted into the Iraqi Army against their will and have now been classified by international agencies [meaning the UN] as refugees who face persecution by Iraqi President Saddam Hussein’s regime if they return home," reported the August 25, 1993 Washington Post.

When news leaked of the $70 million resettlement effort, a bipartisan group of 75 congressmen sent a letter of protest to the White House. "We find it disturbing that American taxpayers must fund the travel of former Iraqi soldiers (who took up arms against our own soldiers) to the U.S.," declared the letter. "Ironically, we provide the [Iraqi POWs] with welfare services while asking our own veterans and service personnel to bear the burdens of deficit reduction."

Alluding to propaganda leaflets used to encourage Iraqi soldiers to surrender, Congressman Clifford Stearns (R-Fla.) wryly commented: "When we dropped those leaflets on the Republican Guard, we did not include a plane ticket to Middle America and welfare entitlement benefits. When those guys realized the war was lost, they changed into civilian clothes and surrendered, and now we’re rolling out the red carpet."

Hitting up taxpayers to subsidize former Iraqi troops is outrageous. Bilking taxpayers to support potential Iraqi terrorist agents is potentially suicidal — and Saddam’s intention to infiltrate terrorists into this country was well known more than a decade ago. The Washington Post reported on January 28, 1991 that, according to "highly classified U.S. intelligence reports," Saddam Hussein had "dispatched more than 100 terrorists, both experienced and novice, to try to infiltrate the United States." Some might contend that the presence of Iraqi "sleepers" in our nation justifies a "preemptive" war with Iraq. But if defending our country is the object, our efforts should focus on rolling up terrorist networks here, beginning with Iraqi suspects brought here by our own government

8 posted on 03/31/2003 8:33:58 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
This is completly unbelievable! How was this company
able to get away with this? Where is Security?
And, yes, it has #42's fingerprints all over it. Their
curse will never go away. Remember, I wrote a week ago
about the Chinese taking over a terminal at the Port of
Los Angeles. AlohaRonnie was very familiar with this and
mentioned that Hillary's fingerprints are all over this one.
What can we do - block all port entrances and search everything ourselves?
9 posted on 03/31/2003 8:36:49 PM PST by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
Mr. Perle said this afternoon that he was retained by Loral seven months before his appointment by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to head the Defense Policy Board and was given a one-time retainer at the outset of his work.

"I was retained by Loral in January 2001 to assist the company in assessing its dispute with the government concerning transfers of technology to the Chinese, to recommend approaches to settling that dispute including new security arrangements to assure against any further technology leakage," he said. "At no time did I urge any government official to settle the case."

He said any conversations he may have had with Mr. Bloomfield or his staff "related to the licensing" of other Loral satellites for the Chinese and that he was "not compensated by the company in connection with that activity."

Mr. Perle declined to say how much he was paid by Loral. He said he did not file a lobbying disclosure statement because he did no lobbying on behalf of Loral.

After criticism of his business deals, Mr. Perle announced on Thursday that he would resign as chairman of the Defense Policy Board but would remain on the board. In July 2001, he was appointed to head the board, a group of influential advisers that meets regularly with the defense secretary and other top officials, has access to classified information and plays an important role in shaping military policy.
10 posted on 03/31/2003 8:38:25 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
for later
11 posted on 03/31/2003 8:39:56 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
its all about China buying up America
12 posted on 03/31/2003 8:40:14 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
I don't mind cheap plastic toys from China. This, however, makes no sense to me at all. The only possible good scenario is that it is a disinfomation campaign. That seems a bit far fetched though. I say blame Clinton as it is almost a lock that the details of this were worked out by his commerce dept.
13 posted on 03/31/2003 8:41:14 PM PST by AdA$tra (Tagline maintenance in progress......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
1995! Right smack dab in the middle of the Serial Rapist's sell-off of EVERY SINGLE U.S. weapons technology to his Chinese Communists partners. We screamed bloody murder about it here. Cowardly Senate Republicans turned blind eye.
14 posted on 03/31/2003 8:41:23 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
This is completly unbelievable! How was this company able to get away with this? Where is Security?

My guess: this facility has nothing to do with JDAMs.

Notice that the Valparaiso factory is NEVER specifically tied to the JDAM contract. There's a kind of ellipsis in there that leaves it suggested, but it's never plainly stated outright.

15 posted on 03/31/2003 8:41:46 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Its more
16 posted on 03/31/2003 8:43:40 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gettheUSoutoftheUN
and this is what we see on the report,how many more companies are doing something similar??
17 posted on 03/31/2003 8:44:19 PM PST by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
Chinese taking over a terminal at the Port of Los Angeles.

Isn't this the same bunch who could effectively control the Panama Canal traffic too ?
18 posted on 03/31/2003 8:44:32 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Mr. Perle said this afternoon that he was retained by Loral seven months before his appointment by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to head the Defense Policy Board and was given a one-time retainer at the outset of his work.

"I was retained by Loral in January 2001 to assist the company in assessing its dispute with the government concerning transfers of technology to the Chinese, to recommend approaches to settling that dispute including new security arrangements to assure against any further technology leakage," he said. "At no time did I urge any government official to settle the case."

19 posted on 03/31/2003 8:44:36 PM PST by gettheUSoutoftheUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xrp
WTF is wrong with this country?

Lots of things...

#1. HIGH TAXES.
#2. OVER REGULATION.
#3. RIDICULOUS ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.
#4. BUREACRACY.

And that's just a start.


20 posted on 03/31/2003 8:45:30 PM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problem solved !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson