the standard for stops for investigative purposes evolved into one of ''reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.'' That test permits some stops and questioning without probable cause in order to allow police officers to explore the foun dations of their suspicions
Here was a wise@$$ with chip on his shoulder taking time out of his busy life to bust the b@lls of the establishment... and he gets his b@lls busted in return... so what.
I sometimes whistfully long for the days when a nice crisp punch in the nose was an acceptible response to a wise@$$.
investigative purposes evolved into one of ''reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.''
I despise that word. Evolved. As if it was just an acceptable next step to the original intent. Activist judges (from both sides of the aisle) have twisted the Constitution into a document that's no longer recognizable. What I wouldn't give for a set of federal judges that read the document and ruled based on what it said instead of trying to gleam the 'intent' out of the argument