Skip to comments.
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 3-LIVE THREAD***
FreeRepublic - Day 2 ^
| 212 March 2003
| An.American.Expatriate/null and void
Posted on 03/21/2003 9:19:52 PM PST by null and void
Good Morning.
This is the continuation Thread of Operation Iraqi Freedom - Day 1- LIVE THREAD.
It is designed for general conversation about the events of the day. In depth discussion of events should be left to individual threads - but links to the threads or other articles is highly encouraged. This allows us to stay abreast of the situation in general, while also providing a means of obtaining specific information.
To all who helped this get started, thank you!
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ccrm; day3; iraq; iraqifreedom; live; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 4,741-4,752 next last
To: ztiworoh
If all goes as planned and the Iraqi's are enjoying their new found freedom fairly soon, I think it would be political suicide for the liberals to start anything about war being declared or not.
41
posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:02 PM PST
by
knak
(kelly in alaska)
To: Cboldt
I resolution was clear. What does it have to say to be a technically declaration of war? "We Declare War"?
Sounds as useless legally as going through the UN for 12 years.
42
posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:06 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Victory for the Iraqi People)
To: null and void
LOL .. it's what I do best .. just ask the VI's
43
posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:10 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Patriots Rally for America V: Liberty Weekend in Washington DC Sunday March 23)
To: seamole
Good, a new thread. Day 3. May it be the last day of fighting.
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
Goin for a walk in the cool night desert air of Tempe. Hold down the fort. The Baghdad Cam is rolling.
To: Latina_Abogada
Did you say that we know for sure that Saddam is dead because the satellite capability followed the ambulance and we took Saddam out? I wondered if that could have happened.
47
posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:29 PM PST
by
swheats
To: ztiworoh
I thought GW Bush signed an executive order reversing the assasination ban.
48
posted on
03/21/2003 9:31:54 PM PST
by
Anomaly in Illinois
( If you steal from one author, it's plagiarism; if you steal from many, it's research(never forget)
To: Valin
Just a strange little side note I thought I'd share..
I'm sitting here watching tv and seeing all these bomb blasts, and hearing them as well, and then I can hear the artillery fire from Ft Hood right outside my window..it's a little bit eerie.
To: Valin
That's what Oliver North has been calling this: Operation Baghdad Urban Renewal LOL!
50
posted on
03/21/2003 9:32:28 PM PST
by
SW6906
To: SW6906
Probably me. I'm just trying to figure out where I need to be. A little help please? New thread or not?
51
posted on
03/21/2003 9:32:32 PM PST
by
gop212
To: RummyChick
Now that's a conspiracy theory!
52
posted on
03/21/2003 9:32:32 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Victory for the Iraqi People)
To: ztiworoh
You missed that resolution of force and war that was passed 9/12/2003 ... that's all the authority that he needs at this point. Personally I would have like to have seen a full Declaration of War ... but that's just being cricket.
I'm fine the way it is ... this is some of the best things in life in the last few days.
We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberals.
53
posted on
03/21/2003 9:32:34 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
To: knak
Of course if it turns out that the war ends so soon with relatively few casualties, the liberals are going to whine that "see Saddam wasn't so dangerous, if he was he would have used chemical weapons."
54
posted on
03/21/2003 9:32:36 PM PST
by
dfwgator
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: dfwgator
hopefully we'll be able to say he couldn't use them because he was being being fertilizer.
To: gop212
I'm bouncing back and forth, waiting for thread 2 to die, but then thread 1 lasted into this afternoon......
57
posted on
03/21/2003 9:33:52 PM PST
by
SW6906
To: Fledermaus
A war resolution has to be brought up, the last resolution simply expressed confidence and support for the President and said Congress had no objections, but it was not a declared war via an expressly stated war resolution which would say "Be it resolved that the US has declared a state of war between themselves and the governemnt of the Republic of Iraq etc..."
It is a formality, but it could make a legal difference
I do agree it'd be a political sucicide though
58
posted on
03/21/2003 9:34:17 PM PST
by
ztiworoh
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: ztiworoh
Yes, but UN or not, the Liberals could bring up charges based on Bush violating the executive order banning assasinations, and that's a constitutional issue, not a UN issue. So the question is, was war declared or not, and can a head of state ALSO be considered an enemy combatant Well from what is known .. all we knew was there was a chance of Top Iraqi Officials that were there .. who said they were targeting Saddam?
60
posted on
03/21/2003 9:34:42 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Patriots Rally for America V: Liberty Weekend in Washington DC Sunday March 23)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 4,741-4,752 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson