Skip to comments.
Powell: 30 Nations in Anti-Iraq Coalition
AP ^
| 03/18/03
| BARRY SCHWEID
Posted on 03/18/2003 9:35:47 AM PST by nypokerface
WASHINGTON - Thirty nations have joined with the United States in a "coalition of the willing" to bring down Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and another 15 quietly have promised their support, Secretary of State Colin Powell said Tuesday.
Powell told reporters he had received assurances of open support in telephone conversations with the foreign ministers of Denmark and the Netherlands, but that Russian President Vladimir Putin had reaffirmed his opposition to war with Iraq in a telephone conversation with President Bush.
At the same time, Powell said Saddam Hussein so far had rejected Bush's demand that he leave Iraq, but that a number of countries were still trying to persuade the Iraqi president to go into exile.
"He has essentially dismissed the message," Powell said.
Asked when the United States may go to war against Iraq, the former Army general said he had "learned long ago not to make predictions."
The State Department released a list of the 30 countries, one of which, Japan, was identified as only a post-conflict member of the coalition.
Turkey was included, and Powell said even as the Turkish parliament debates a U.S. proposal to use Turkish territory for an invasion of northern Iraq he was confident of Turkish cooperation in one form or another.
Powell also hinted that if the parliament accepts the U.S. proposal the Bush administration might revive its offer of $6 billion in special economic assistance.
Powell said war plans have been drawn up designed to minimize Iraqi civilian casualties and to warn Iraqi commanders about their actions. He said the U.S. aim was "to make it as quick as possible."
Powell also said he would not attend a U.N. Security Council meeting on Wednesday at which the chief U.N. weapons inspector, Hans Blix, is due to make a report.
France and Russia, which opposed war and sought to extend inspections, have indicated they would be represented by their foreign ministers.
But Powell said he saw no point in going, and that U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte would represent the United States.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Republican Wildcat
We cannot fail now that Eritrea is on our side
To: The G Man
G Man,
During that Fox report last night, was I imagining things, or did one of the reporters say that we had 10 votes on the Sec. Counsel last week for Res. #18 but held off because of the French veto?
Did anyone here this? If it's true, why isn't anyone in the administration pushing this point?
JM
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Portugal has announce neutrality, supporting nor opposing either side.
23
posted on
03/18/2003 9:58:39 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: *war_list
To: JoeMerchant
I don't know if a reporter said it, but I defnitely heard the British ambassador to the UN say so. He said that once France went public with their veto, the nations backed off, because with public support lagging in theier own countries, "they did not want to bear a cross to no purpose."
To: Sangamon Kid
How is this a pathetic coalition?
Most of the worlds combat power is with us.
To: Dog Gone
Nicaragua?They're letting us use their airspace.
To: Sangamon Kid
How is this a pathetic coalition?
Most of the worlds combat power is with us.
To: Sangamon Kid
"this one of the most pathetic coalitions of all time, 30 or not. Lets see it's 32 with Portugal and America. And I don't see mention of Kuwait which is the staging ground or for that matter Qatar or Saudi Arabia.
What did you expect a coalition of 10 America's??? So you think the coalition would be better if Irrelefrance was sucking on our backside?
29
posted on
03/18/2003 10:07:07 AM PST
by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
To: Miss Marple
Thanks Miss Marple.
I heard it once, and then did not hear it repeated. Mixed in with all the other news I thought I was starting to hear things.
Someone should throw that fact in Tom Daschle's face!
JM
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Eritrea Who? where is that????
To: Sangamon Kid
US, GB, and Australia, which helps because of the common language. Poland and Ukraine sending support troops, perhaps other countries.
To: DannyTN
right - Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAR are all supporting us in some manner and are all members of OPEC.
To: nypokerface
Powell also said he would not attend a U.N. Security Council meeting on Wednesday .... France and Russia have indicated they would be represented by their foreign ministers. But Powell said he saw no point in going...A League of Nations moment for the UN, brought to them by the leading multilateralist in the US government. Welcome to the future, Koffi & co.
To: AlextheWise1; TheBattman
If only we could get the Duchy of Grand Fenwick on our side.
To: Sangamon Kid
Would you care to enunciate other wartime coalitions you regard as being less "pathetic"?
CA....
36
posted on
03/18/2003 10:15:59 AM PST
by
Chances Are
(Whew! Seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
To: GraniteStateConservative
We'll just have to pass the Duchy on the lefthand side.
To: GraniteStateConservative
I understand we are working on that angle even as we speak!
CA....
38
posted on
03/18/2003 10:19:04 AM PST
by
Chances Are
(Whew! Seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
To: TheBattman
To: AlextheWise1
Most of the worlds combat power is with us. Remove America and what do you have?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson