Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/16/2003 6:56:06 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aculeus
Very nice article! Bump! This was an excellent read.
2 posted on 03/16/2003 7:03:38 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Saddam attempting to use the WMD he claims to not possess (how ironic is that!) will mean total political victory for Bush and Blair and massive retribution for Socialists, Democrats and resistive Iraqis.

Not using WMD will mean he will expire rapidly by his own people's hands.

A lose-lose proposition for Saddam.

His only hope remains diplomatic, with tyrant-supporters France, Germany and Russia on the side of Evil once again.

Bush, thank you for dumping Powell and the mad quest for world approval.

Undeserving as they are, you have saved the world, again.

4 posted on 03/16/2003 7:21:45 AM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
one officer was distraught. "You have just made a big mistake, Colonel," he intoned. "When you try to kill a snake, you must strike the head, not the body. You should have done to Saddam what you did to Noriega." Another told his debriefer with sadness in his voice, "If you had sent your troops to Baghdad, the people would have welcomed them as liberators, and Saddam's security forces would have melted away. You have missed your big chance."

Will it be different this time; with the French interfering?

Our conditions for Iraq's surrender are what? They are not unconditional.

Suppose Iraq surrenders after 24 hours, offering no resistance on condition that all Allied forces stay put? How will Bush proceed?

5 posted on 03/16/2003 7:22:21 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus; #3Fan; A CA Guy; Amelia; anniegetyourgun; AppyPappy; ArneFufkin; Arthur McGowan; ...
An excellent article.
6 posted on 03/16/2003 7:35:14 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Excellent summary of the media rerun of prewar hype being forcibly jammed down our throats by the same darned suspects, some of whom are toting the SAME DARNED PROTEST SIGNS and chanting the SAME DARNED CHANTS that they did 12 years ago.
7 posted on 03/16/2003 7:37:21 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
To my mind it is very hard to understand how Sadam can put up any fight at all. There is one and only one way for any upper echelon officer to survive the next week. Make a deal with the American military NOW not later. Every officer is a marked man in post Sadam Iraq unless they help us now. They have too many victims in-country. They have no place to hide or run to. I don't think there is even going to be any real war.
8 posted on 03/16/2003 7:43:58 AM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Saddam's attitude about the value of people is so clintonesque.
9 posted on 03/16/2003 7:46:53 AM PST by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
must read bump!
10 posted on 03/16/2003 7:52:11 AM PST by Kay Ludlow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
A few months later, after a 39-day air campaign and barely four days of ground combat, the Iraqi army was routed as perhaps no army in modern times, all with negligible coalition casualties.

I listened to an author historian, Richard Marbury (sp?), discuss the last gulf war and why the job wasn't finished. He quoted both Powell and Schwartzkopf as saying that the US decided not to follow the fleeing iraqi army because it was a trap, a 'tar pit' in which the US would be trapped and targets of saddam's wmd. The army that was destroyed was described as saddam's throw aways, those least likely to support saddam.

11 posted on 03/16/2003 8:04:32 AM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
Par Excellente!

We learned much from 1991.

So did the Iraqis. My step-dad was U.S. Army and had been in southern Iraq for six months. He loves recallilng how the surrenderring mass Iraqi soldiers (some even surrenderred to a porta-john) were so petrified from the B52 bombings, their hands were shaking so violently for almost two days they couldn't even hold a cup of water.

Go Home To Yo' Mamma!


12 posted on 03/16/2003 8:29:05 AM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dighton; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart
Help! I love Boosh!

Boomp!

16 posted on 03/16/2003 9:00:23 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus
There was a report last week that said Iraqi soldiers were already surrendering to British troops. The troops told them to go back, the war hadn't started yet.
18 posted on 03/16/2003 9:49:42 AM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aculeus; Cultural Jihad; Howlin; Liz; Mudboy Slim
The depth of distrust and hatred for Saddam Hussein among these army officers astounded us. "He does not trust us," one general told me, "To him we were expendable. That's why he positioned the Republican Guard with an escape route, and left the regular army to be defeated."

Maybe we could enlist enemy troops to finish off Saddam...

21 posted on 03/16/2003 12:07:01 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson