Skip to comments.
The Lowdown on the Showdown
Posted on 03/14/2003 5:47:33 PM PST by GLDNGUN
While most are aware by now that President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar will confer Sunday in the Azores, it seems just as many do not realize the weight of this meeting. This truly is a war council...
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeasement; aznar; azoresislands; blair; bush; iraq; peaceinourtime; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-315 next last
To: Neets
Thanks for the ping.
To: CyberAnt
You are thinking the other leaders have been invited, but have kept mum about it. Yes. I was thinking about the Letter signed by the "Gang of 8" that sent Schroeder and Chirac into orbit.
I was thinking maybe it was going to be a teleconference - because I believe the Azores is a substitute landing place for the Shuttle Orbitor, and there might be the tech available to bring that off without the leaders having to travel.
Excellent analysis. I think that makes a tremendous amount of sense.
262
posted on
03/15/2003 3:17:48 PM PST
by
Maeve
(Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
To: CyberAnt
....after Bush speaks to America on Monday night, their "meeting" will be a moot point. It may be a moot point after the speeches tomorrow afternoon...
263
posted on
03/15/2003 3:28:01 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: deport
This wasn't a lets chat about Iraq meeting but a here's how we are gonna do it meeting, imo. I agree!
264
posted on
03/15/2003 3:37:34 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: Maeve
Well ... I guess we'll see if I'm right or not by Sunday nite.
265
posted on
03/15/2003 3:40:25 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: CyberAnt
Honestly, dear CyberAnt, we may never know for sure one way or another -- so as to keep the French, German, and Russians off-balance and the Saddamites quaking in their boots.
266
posted on
03/15/2003 3:43:41 PM PST
by
Maeve
(Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
To: Brett66
It is better to be in the UN fighting to fix it, then out and watching the Socialists turn it into a World Govt. without US influence.
We should force a reform agenda: No votes for dictatorships; all countries must be democratic and free of human rights abuses or they kicked off the UN secty council (bye bye China and Syria) and lose voting rights in gen'l assembly.
End the veto power of has-been countries (bye bye France) and those who dont pay their way (Russia, if you want a veto pay up, otherwise let Japan take over for you).
Cut the big bureaucracy and the padded cushy jobs for 3rd world-types. Cut the staff 80% (most of it is useless advocacy of liberal agenda items that *WE* pay for. End it.)
By the time we are done, the UN will be slimmed down into the only thing it can and should be: A talk shop for the foreign ministers to discuss int'l affairs.
We DONT actually want the UN to be "relevent" to such matters as disfaning a tyrant. Power corrupts, and UN power could corrupt world power.
267
posted on
03/15/2003 3:44:41 PM PST
by
WOSG
(Liberate Iraq! Lets Roll! now!)
To: Amelia
True; so true - I forgot they were going to hold a conference after the day long meeting.
If they don't say what I think they're going to say, I'll try to contain myself (because I understand they know more than I do) - but if they do say what I think they'll say, I'm going to be jumping up and down - and waiting for the EU weasels to begin sputtering and spitting. It should be toooooo fun to watch!!
268
posted on
03/15/2003 4:05:43 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
( -> -> -> Oswego!!)
To: Lady In Blue
Bump!
Let's Roll!
269
posted on
03/15/2003 4:05:57 PM PST
by
blackie
To: GLDNGUN
An excellent thread, sir. ;^)
If a new Alliance is formed, this would truly be an epochal moment in modern history.
To: GLDNGUN; MeeknMing
..it is expected to surprise most people due to its shortness of duration and relative little bloodshed. Most of the dirty work may actually be done BY the Iraqi military as they take care of Saddam themselves
GLDNGUN, thank you for this analysis. This charade did expose the Rats, didn't it? A month ago most Americans thought we should bow to the UN. Now most Americans say to go it alone. GW helped undo decades worth of pro-UN propaganda in just weeks.
Unanswered question, can we survive the international mainstream media - BBC and AP - when they are so spiritually off track that they keep treating Saddam ("Joe, the village liar" to Rummy) as President Bush's moral equivalent?
Meekie, thanks for the heads up. (^;
271
posted on
03/15/2003 5:22:01 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("A war against Saddam Hussein would be a war for Iraq." An Iraqi in America)
To: CyberAnt
if they do say what I think they'll say, I'm going to be jumping up and down - and waiting for the EU weasels to begin sputtering and spitting. It should be toooooo fun to watch!! I'll be jumping up and down with you! Meantime, for another interesting article, press here.
272
posted on
03/15/2003 5:43:27 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: FreedomFarmer
Quidam????????
273
posted on
03/15/2003 6:29:04 PM PST
by
milagro
To: GLDNGUN
"War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. . . ."
--Faramir, Captain of Gondor
274
posted on
03/15/2003 8:02:01 PM PST
by
Charles Henrickson
(The Two Towers, Book IV, Chapter 5, "The Window on the West")
To: edwin hubble
Some "willing participants" are desirable that their efforts are quiet in public..... like Jordan, who is allowing choppers and other stuff; Saudi Arabia..... who is not only allowing overfly rights that Turkey wouldn't give us by allowing the cruise missles to fly over their land, but also giving us access to bases for refulers and rescuse choppers, etc.
And a host of other neighboring nations, all probably fearful of internal retribution.
I think we should respect their wishes.
275
posted on
03/15/2003 8:23:24 PM PST
by
bart99
To: GLDNGUN
VERY interesting analysis.
276
posted on
03/15/2003 8:37:55 PM PST
by
EternalHope
(France and Germany are with Sauron. But they are so insignificant he didn't notice.)
To: pacman50
Don't Miss This One!
277
posted on
03/15/2003 8:39:45 PM PST
by
cmsgop
( Arby's says no more Horsey Sauce for Scott Ritter !!!!)
To: GLDNGUN
"Bush could well use our exit from the UN as a campaign issue. He could say he would lead our removal from the UN in his second term. This could be VERY popular if it plays out right. That will leave the demo opponent with agreeing to leave the UN (can you imagine a demo even having such a thought pass their head? LOL) OR to oppose a very popular idea."
Now there's a thought that's a breath of fresh air!
278
posted on
03/15/2003 9:23:15 PM PST
by
Oorang
To: Oorang
Bump
279
posted on
03/15/2003 9:42:37 PM PST
by
MEG33
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; mountaineer; lodwick; BigWaveBetty; Endeavor
This is too good to miss. Lots of interesting analysis.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300, 301-315 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson