Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Lowdown on the Showdown

Posted on 03/14/2003 5:47:33 PM PST by GLDNGUN

While most are aware by now that President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar will confer Sunday in the Azores, it seems just as many do not realize the weight of this meeting. This truly is a “war council”...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeasement; aznar; azoresislands; blair; bush; iraq; peaceinourtime; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-315 next last
While most are aware by now that President Bush, British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar will confer Sunday in the Azores, it seems just as many do not realize the weight of this meeting. This truly is a “war council”. A “little birdy” informed me days ago of this gathering, long before it was mentioned publicly. I was told that there would be a summit of the “Big 3” at a “neutral site”, meaning not in the US, GB, or Spain, but likely on an island in the Atlantic belonging to a friendly ally. While this meeting is described as being “hastily arranged”, it has actually been in the planning for some time. Once it became clear that the US and the “willing coalition” would be the liberating force it was decided that the “Big 3” should meet in person for several reasons.

While, the situation is still fluid here is some background and likely summit scenario. It’s being reported that “topping the agenda will be strategies for salvaging the trio's troubled war resolution at the United Nations.” Actually, the UN aspect is for all intents and purposes DEAD. As most are aware, it was Blair, and to a lesser extent, Aznar, that wanted another UN resolution so desperately. Bush agreed in order to assist his friends, both foreign (UK, Spain) and domestic (doves like Powell). To show just how far he was willing to go for them, Bush made his press conference statement that there would be a UN vote, period. The problem was that Blair had underestimated the French resolve to undermine the “coalition of the willing”. It finally became apparent to him that Chirac would oppose ANY reasonable resolution. This has angered Blair to no end, and he believes that Chirac is trying to end his political career in order to become the “the voice” of the EU and elevate France’s stature. Chirac believes he has Blair trapped, thinking Tony can’t or won’t go to war without another UN resolution. On the other hand, Chirac simply will not agree to any reasonable resolution, while trying to appear that they are open to new proposals. They are not, so he believes he has Blair in a box.

The one thing worse for Blair than going to war without another UN resolution would be going to war after a UN resolution failed to pass, thus the same man who urged Bush to back another resolution is now urging him to abandon his call for a vote. Blair, however, feels he still needs to bring some “international legitimacy” to going to war. A comment made by Bush’s press secretary a few days ago was passed over by the press, but the words were loaded. Ari said “an international coalition WILL disarm Iraq. It may not be the UN, but there will be an international coalition that acts.” What was missed there by the press is that those are more than mere words. Expect those words to become official policy at the Sunday meeting. Again, barring some dramatic developments, this coalition will be made official. It will likely be given a name and have the signatures of the “Big 3” and may be co-signed by several other countries either at the same time, or in the next few days/weeks. This is all to give this alliance as much “legitimacy” as possible, mostly for Blair’s sake. Now, at the same time this new organization is being given legitimacy, it is equally as important for them to discredit the UN. The latter will be given as the reason why another resolution will not be ultimately pursued in the UN. This is an end-around Chirac and his little game, and will be a mighty blow to the UN, at least to the Security Council.

At the end of the summit, these announcements will be made and the “Big 3” will each give statements. The concerted message will be: Iraq has missed its last chance to be disarmed peacefully, the UN, especially the SC, has been so poisoned by the “charade” (look for Bush and Blair to both use that word for obvious reasons) that it is has NO legitimate role, a new organization has been formed of those that will participate in some fashion or another in the liberation and rebuilding of Iraq. They will then give a deadline of 3-7 days for Saddam to surrender, leave the country, or prepare to be disarmed by the coalition. This will also be the signal for all non-Iraqis to get out of the country.

This will be the closest thing to a “declaration of war” as we are going to see. The “Big 3” will make this announcement jointly, then return to their respective nations to speak to their countries. Bush will likely address the nation on Monday evening saying something to the effect of “this is the day we had hoped to have a unified UN live up to their previous obligations, but they have failed to do so, and we have been left with no choice but to act in concert with a new organization that is determined to finish this…”

Of course there will be many questions about whether these countries are pulling out of the UN. No, they won’t be pulling out, but the company line will be “the UN failed to act this time. Hopefully, next time they will be up to the task”. In reality, the UN may simply wither on the vine and eventually die. None of the countries wants to be seen as the one who put the stake into the heart of the UN. They would rather have history record that the UN Security Council, corrupted by nations such as France and Russia only interested in preserving illegal agreements with Iraq, ultimately killed the monster through their actions or lack thereof.

The press is billing this as a diplomatic summit, and that leaders will not discuss battlefield tactics and detailed military strategies. This is true, in that most of the “diplomacy” will be among the coalition of the willing and the crafting of this new organization. No, there won’t be much “battlefield” talk as those preparations are done for the most part, minus the finetuning.

Another important reason for this summit is to give the “big 3” equal billing. Blair and Aznar did not want to be put in a situation where Bush, sitting in the Oval Office, addressed the nation and the world announcing the ultimatum to Iraq, making it look like he was pulling all the strings and that they were just along for the ride. This way, they make the major announcement jointly and then return to their homelands to address their respective countries. Again, I stress this is a fluid situation that is subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances, but barring some dramatic move by France or Iraq this is the likely scenario from where I sit.

How the war is likely to play out is another story entirely, but it is expected to surprise most people due to its shortness of duration and relative little bloodshed. Most of the dirty work may actually be done BY the Iraqi military as they take care of Saddam themselves…

1 posted on 03/14/2003 5:47:34 PM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Interesting analysis.

Cheers,

knews hound

2 posted on 03/14/2003 5:54:27 PM PST by knews_hound (Anyone else play Day of Defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
"A “little birdy” informed me days ago of this gathering, long before it was mentioned publicly."

I hope your little birdy is right. This is the best news I've heard in awhile.
3 posted on 03/14/2003 5:55:47 PM PST by demkicker (I wanna kick some commie butt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
That's the best and most optimistic cover I've heard for this meeting so I'll go with it.
4 posted on 03/14/2003 5:59:42 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Good, good. I like it!
5 posted on 03/14/2003 5:59:51 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
A “little birdy” informed me days ago of this gathering, long before it was mentioned publicly.

Condie, is that you?

6 posted on 03/14/2003 6:00:08 PM PST by TonyInOhio (Shock and Awe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
I think it's a mistake not to pull out of the UN. There will be another president in a few years and he just might reinvigorate it and it will have new lease on life to work it's evil in the world.
7 posted on 03/14/2003 6:01:49 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan; Mitchell; oceanview
Liberty Alliance bump.
8 posted on 03/14/2003 6:02:14 PM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
This has angered Blair to no end, and he believes that Chirac is trying to end his political career in order to become the “the voice” of the EU and elevate France’s stature.

Ya think??!!!

I like the vibes this has for the present situation, but I hope Blair also has a plan for Europe since he has to "live" there. That's an ugly situation.

9 posted on 03/14/2003 6:06:58 PM PST by aBootes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Sounds reasonable. This part better not be true, though:

this is a fluid situation that is subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances, but barring some dramatic move by France or Iraq this is the likely scenario

The only move out of Iraq that should satisfy us is Saddam's head on a stick.

10 posted on 03/14/2003 6:08:00 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Thank you for your wonderful post!

Very encouraging. Once again the world has under-estimated the President. Great stategery!
11 posted on 03/14/2003 6:08:35 PM PST by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio; quidam
Condie, is that you?

To long winded to be quidam.

12 posted on 03/14/2003 6:11:28 PM PST by FreedomFarmer (Extreme Cow Racing Champion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I wouldn't pull out of the UN. Someone's got to be at the table to veto all the future French resolutions.
13 posted on 03/14/2003 6:12:21 PM PST by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Once again the world has under-estimated the President. Great stategery!

Of course! Chirac thinks he's going to beat Bush at his own American game of Poker and stare down the Sherrif. Meanwhile, the posse has left the saloon, leaving Chirac with no one to play with but himself. Then again, what else would we expect from the French! ;-)

14 posted on 03/14/2003 6:13:16 PM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I have been feeling this way, but there may be a case for staying in and letting it wither, eg.: (i) we may need it for other issues, eg., NK, (ii) better to be inside to keep an eye on what's going on. I do think we should insist that our share of the costs of the UN be reduced significantly.
15 posted on 03/14/2003 6:14:29 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
I would hope that in addition to the 'big 3', we make a big show of all the other countries who are among the 'coalition of the willing' since a lot of people think it's just the three. I'm sure there are a lot of people who don't realize how many countries do support this.
16 posted on 03/14/2003 6:15:41 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
These three (US, UK, Spain) could well be the charter members of a new "Alliance of Free Nations." France can take the United Nations bureaucrats and delegates of the dictatorships to a new home of the U.N. outside Paris. May I suggest Vichy?
17 posted on 03/14/2003 6:17:30 PM PST by Procyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
I think it's a mistake not to pull out of the UN. There will be another president in a few years and he just might reinvigorate it and it will have new lease on life to work it's evil in the world.

Of course, many conservatives agree that we should not be in the UN now. It would just be too much for Bush to pull out AND go to war at the same time, plus the other 2 of the "big 3" aren't ready for such a move, and right now we want a unified front. Bush could well use our exit from the UN as a campaign issue. He could say he would lead our removal from the UN in his second term. This could be VERY popular if it plays out right. That will leave the demo opponent with agreeing to leave the UN (can you imagine a demo even having such a thought pass their head? LOL) OR to oppose a very popular idea.

18 posted on 03/14/2003 6:18:16 PM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aBootes
I like the vibes this has for the present situation, but I hope Blair also has a plan for Europe since he has to "live" there. That's an ugly situation.

When this is over, Blair will likely be more popular than ever, and Chirac will be put in his place. Just as Americans are rallying now behind the prez against the UN and France, the same is/will happen in UK, especially after France's dirty work is exposed (i.e., back alley deals with Saddam).

19 posted on 03/14/2003 6:21:47 PM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
Does france realize yet that they've **** in their mess kit?
20 posted on 03/14/2003 6:25:02 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson