Skip to comments.
TRANSCRIPT: Senator Rick Santorum and Senator Hillary Clinton discussing Partial Birth Abortion
Thomas ^
| 03-13-03
| Senate
Posted on 03/13/2003 10:05:03 AM PST by Registered
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Registered
Ping for later reading. Thank you so much.
To: All
Let Hillary tell that "sitting across from the doctor" story to our NY Bills Football Player (Jim???) with the little boy who has a serious disease. That family is putting their money on eradicating the disease. Hillary eradicates the baby!!!
42
posted on
03/13/2003 12:33:48 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
To: Sacajaweau
Jim Kelly, it is. Western PA native, like Santorum.
you have hit on the exact point, which is where genetic research and such is leading. Long before we have a cure for birth defects, we will have the "solution." Identify them in the womb and eradicate the "imperfect."
Of course, as that progresses, the definition of "imperfect" becomes more broad, and the pressure to "design" your offspring comes in.
Why would you burden society and yourself by bringing a child with a disability in to the world?
SD
To: Registered
bttt
44
posted on
03/13/2003 12:49:51 PM PST
by
Kudsman
(LETS GET IT ON WITH HIM.- The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
To: Registered
This one should be bumped forever. Rick Santorum was nothing less than magnificent.
To: Maeve; Siobhan; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; ...
Thanks for the bump, Maeve!!
I refer the Senator to the State of Kansas where they have to report the reason for a partial-birth abortion; 182 were done last year, or the year before, and of those 182, none--zero--were done because of a problem with the child or a physical problem with the mother. They were classified as mental health.
Herein lies the truth!! It is quite common for politicians, be they at the state or federal level, to drag in the one exception, to justify their position. Senator Santorum cited factual statistics. I once dated a very wonderful guy with a cleft palate. To think that someone would choose to abort their baby for this reason, is criminal. This needs to be reflected in our laws.
Truly frightening, however, is a case in France. Last year, a disabled person sued the state for not allowing him to be aborted. And, he won. Now that is sick!!!
46
posted on
03/13/2003 2:58:07 PM PST
by
NYer
(Kyrie Eleison)
To: Registered
bump
To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
Add this to your pro-life files...
To: Registered
Why don't the supports of "partial Birth" abortion just persuade the mother to have a c-section or be induced. The fetus can survive on it's own at that stage.
50
posted on
03/13/2003 4:31:55 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Don't just sit there, use the links on the Graphic Teaser.)
To: votelife
Beneath the article you will see two links: Report Abuse and Bookmark. Click Bookmark.
If you want to see your bookmarks, go to your preferences or click on your screen name.
To: Registered
Rick is one of the elite good guys. So glad I sent him $100 when he ran in 1996....
52
posted on
03/13/2003 6:59:40 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Registered
Mr. SANTORUM. I certainly respect the difference of opinion the Senator and I have on the underlying issue of abortion. Again, I think people can disagree on that. I, frankly, do not agree there should be a difference between children who are ``normal,'' in society's eyes--I do not know what that means anymore, what a society sees as normal--and those who happen to have birth defects, severe or not. I do not believe we should draw distinctions. Mrs. CLINTON. If the Senator will yield for one final point, I want the RECORD to be very clear that I value every single life and every single person,
Unfortunately for her, she had just demonstrated that she did not. Santorum nailed her.
To: Maeve
I think he should run for President in 2008. Seconded.
To: Aquinasfan
Mrs. CLINTON. If the Senator will yield for one final point, I want the RECORD to be very clear that I value every single life and every single person, Unfortunately for her, she had just demonstrated that she did not. Santorum nailed her.
The record is clear. It's also clear that Mrs. Clinton doesn't consider the fetus-in-question to be either a "life" or a "person." So her statement is technically true, to her at least.
SD
To: Aquinasfan
I think he should run for President in 2008. Seconded.
I would love to see it, but he'll get tarred as bring too "extreme."
What puzzles me is the existence of Pennsylvanians who went in to the voting booth in 2000 and voted for Santorum and Gore.
SD
To: NYer
I really believe that the reason for the decline of NYS is its fpromotion of infant muder and preversion..I await the fire and brimstone..Thanks for the transcript I missed it on TV
57
posted on
03/14/2003 9:18:24 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
(Mar 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
To: NYer
Mr. SANTORUM. Please, let me finish. If a child is not perfect, then that child can be aborted under any circumstances. But if that child is perfect, we are going to protect that child more. I do not think the Americans with Disabilities Act would fit very well into that definition. The Americans with Disabilities Act--of which I know the Senator from Iowa has been a great advocate, and I respect him greatly for it--says we treat all of God's children the same. We look at all--perfect and imperfect--as creatures of God created in his image.
What the Senator from New York is asking me to do is separate those who are somehow not the way our society sees people as they should be today and put them somewhat a peg below legal protection than the perfect child. I hope the Senator is not recommending that because I think that would set a horrible precedent that could be extrapolated, I know probably to the disgust of the Senator from Iowa, certainly to me. Priceless God bless Rick
58
posted on
03/14/2003 9:30:40 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
(Mar 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: Registered
Any word yet on a video of this?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-142 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson