To: MindBender26
I'm sorry, but if the amateur engineers here don't know the answer to that questions, I'm not about to waste time debunking all your pseudo math and amateur engineering. Of course you won't... because you cannot. I provide specifics... you provide hokum. You have not even TRIED to explain anything. You merely toss out ex cathedra pronouncesments like your idiotic (and now debunked) claim that TWA-800 would have been below the horizon for the majority of witnesses.
218 posted on
03/17/2003 9:45:10 AM PST by
Swordmaker
(Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
To: Swordmaker
Who debunked what?
If you cannot work a simple triangulation problems from a typical observations point on Long Island and the typical constructed building elevated horizon on Long Island, why in the world would you expect anyone accept anything you post here re: TWA 800.
The bottom line is simple. Either you are too foolish to understand the realities of the accident or are part of the scam trying to peddle these worthless books. Bottom line, I'm out this discussion. Sell each other the book!
232 posted on
03/17/2003 11:58:16 AM PST by
MindBender26
(.....and for more news as it happens...stay tuned to your local FReeper station....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson