[MindBender26]

Who debunked what?

If you cannot work a simple triangulation problems from a typical observations point on Long Island and the typical constructed building elevated horizon on Long Island, why in the world would you expect anyone accept anything you post here re: TWA 800.

The bottom line is simple. Either you are too foolish to understand the realities of the accident or are part of the scam trying to peddle these worthless books. Bottom line, I'm out this discussion. Sell each other the book!

[Swordmaker]

Who debunked what?

I debunked you.

If you cannot work a simple triangulation problems from a typical observations point on Long Island and the typical constructed building elevated horizon on Long Island, why in the world would you expect anyone accept anything you post here re: TWA 800.

I did work out the horizon line problems... it is you who claimed a jet aircraft flying at 15,000 feet 10-15 miles away would be below the horizon. I merely hoist you on your own petard by showing that the horizon for a person standing with his eyes at 30 feet will see a horizon 7 miles away... and that at 14 miles, only objects below 30 feet will be below the horizon... quite a difference than 15,000, wouldn't you say? No, I know you wouldn't... because you would have to admit you are wrong. The laws of physics can be telling when applied to lies.

[acehai]

Bottom line, I'm out this discussion. Sell each other the book!

Don't have to...The book is doing quite well on it's own.

Flight 800 book sales flying high 'First Strike' ranked at 26 on Amazon best-seller list