Posted on 03/12/2003 8:01:09 PM PST by Shermy
Elizabeth Smart, the 15-year-old Salt Lake City girl kidnapped from her home last June, had been held in a polygamous relationship by a man who believed God had told him to take her as another wife.
Police sources in Utah, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the man had kidnapped the girl more than 8 months ago and she was living with him and at least one other woman in a house in suburban Sandy, Utah, about 20 miles south of the girl’s home.
The girl was found alive — against all hope — in a car stopped by police.
“Miracles do exist,” said the girl's uncle, Tom Smart. He said the girl was in good condition.
Elizabeth was wearing a wig when police in Sandy pulled over the drifter, a man known as Emmanuel, authorities said. She was taken to the Salt Lake City police department, where her family was with her.
Brian David Mitchell
The man, whose real name is Brian David Mitchell, had worked “for about five hours” at the girl’s parents' luxurious home in the foothills near the state Capitol more than a year earlier, the source said. Police say he had become enamored of the girl at that time and prayed about taking her as another wife.
“It was a religious thing,” the source said. “This guy just wanted another wife and God told him this was the one.”
A month ago, the Smarts held a news conference where they released a sketch of Mitchell, who did work at their home in November 2001. As recently as yesterday, the family openly criticized police for not devoting enough attention to the former handyman.
Mitchell’s sister called authorities with his identity after the family’s Feb. 3 news conference. The man’s stepson gave investigators photos of Mitchell and said his stepfather was “capable” of kidnapping a child.
He also said Mitchell believes he is a prophet who needs to preach to the homeless and has no source of income other than handouts.
On the night of June 5, 2002, a man cut the screen in the girl’s bedroom window and climbed inside. Armed with a handgun, he took the child from her bed while her little sister, Mary Katherine, witnessed the kidnapping. The sister, afraid the man was still in the house, laid in bed for several hours before waking her parents and reporting the kidnapping.
Last month, Elizabeth’s younger sister was re-interviewed by detectives and told them that the man who broke into the bedroom that night resembled the man she knew as Emmanuel. Elizabeth Smart’s parents issued a new reward and released a sketch of the man.
Until then, police were disheartened over the disappearance. Their main suspect, a convicted burglar named Richard Albert Ricci, had died in prison of a brain hemorrhage last August. He had steadfastly denied any role in kidnapping the girl.
Investigators have said they believe Ricci was involved but may not have acted alone.
“They should have caught this guy by now,” said Tom Smart. “The police are too vested in Ricci.”
Elizabeth’s father, Ed, was less harsh but expressed his “frustration” at public statements made by police dismissing Mitchell as a potential suspect.
Police said they followed up more than 16,000 leads from the public in addition to those they came up with themselves.
Children’s advocates were elated by the good news.
“We are very, very relieved,” said Marilyn Ward, director of Child Search, a national missing children center based in Houston. “This should help the cause of missing children everywhere. We are thankful she’s alive. It gives hope to people to never give up.”
Or, why do some Baptist or Methodist preachers wear robes when they do their sacrament services?
"Garments" or as you put it "underwear" are just that. They are worn under your clothes. You wouldn't know if someone had them on or not.
They are representative of a personal covenant between the wearer and God. There is no one in between those two.
Temple clothing on the other hand is something entirely different and is never worn outside of the Temple. Period. If a person were to run around the streets in Temple clothing they would run about a 95% chance or better of being excommunicated for apostasy. And everyone knows it. There would be no need whatsoever to call anyone to know that.
I am saying the posters on this thread are very ignorant of them, Mormons, Temples, Temple clothing, and the differences between all of those, etc.
You are exhibiting that you are no exception.
BUT THIS GUY WAS NOT A MORMON! Just some crazy who maybe had his own Ideas and interpretations of the Book of Mormon. No different than any of the other sects that have been condemned and rejected by the church.
He is a nut and his actions are no reflection on the LDS!
You are posting a bunch of stuff on the internet that you know nothing about. For those who are remotely knowledgeable its crystal clear.
Guilty as charged but I'm ignorant about a lot of things. Would love some insight and patience rather than name calling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.