To: Partisan Hack; maui_hawaii
The more you go on and on about temple garments, makes me think that the real issue is not the garments, but what people think of those garments and the people who wear them. I don't get the big issue with what he was wearing. Why not a clown suit, or a wet suit for that matter? What is the big deal?
To: Pan_Yans Wife
I don't get the big issue with what he was wearing. Are you serious? If he was wearing something that looked like temple garments, it would be irrelevent?
Come on!
To: Pan_Yans Wife
I think you are right on actually. What
is the big deal?
As for me though, I don't think it should be that someone takes free potshots at my, or anyone else's religion. I don't think I should let someone spread lies or rumors. Whether they are done out of ignorance or spite is beside the point.
The whole "mormon" thing is beside the point in my opinion. But it seems as though this is becoming the center of the topic here, primarily, I think for ulterior motives.
To: Pan_Yans Wife
The big deal about the clothes is that the police described the abductor as wearing a golf hat! A hat similar to one that was found in Ricci's father-in-law's closet. Now we hear from one of the uncle's that the family always felt that she was alive somewhere because they believed that she had been taken by someone like this man and that was the reason for that strange plea for her return (the one that gave most of us the creeps). We were all complaining about the strange behavior of the uncles and weird things that they were saying. It all seemed so pollyanna-like, considering what we thought were the facts of the case. Now, we find out that the family thought all along that she had been kidnapped for some weird polygamic relationship.
391 posted on
03/12/2003 11:48:16 PM PST by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson