Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN plan to give Saddam 72 hours to leave Baghdad
Sunday Herald ^ | 3/8/03

Posted on 03/08/2003 7:47:00 PM PST by areafiftyone

SADDAM Hussein and his family are to be given 72 hours on Tuesday to accept an offer of exile, while 50 of Iraq's top military brass will be offered an amnesty in return for full co-operation with the United Nations in a secret plan to be tabled at its New York headquarters. The highly sensitive proposal was tabled by Pakistan during a closed-door meeting of the 10 non-permanent members of the Security Council on Friday and was brokered by Saudi Arabia, the Vatican and moderate Arab states. Failure by Saddam to agree to the plan would clear the way for war.

If the proposal, understood to be in the form of a short paragraph, becomes part of a second resolution and is adopted by the Security Council, the UN would oversee the establishment of a post-Saddam government and the UN, not the US, would take stewardship of Iraq's oilfields.

The Iraqi generals and top ranking officers would have to co-operate fully with UN inspectors to oversee the total elimination of any weapons of mass destruction.

Pope John Paul II has dispatched his emissaries to meet all the key parties during the past two weeks. His special envoy and per manent observer at the UN, Archbishop Renato Rafaele Martino, has been discussing the proposal with all the Security Council members.

Meanwhile, Cardinal Pio Laghi, a former Papal Nuncio, met with President George W Bush, while Cardinal Angelo Sodano has met with Tony Blair. Cardinal Roger Etchegaray met with Saddam in Baghdad and discussed the subject of exile, which he said Saddam did not rule out.

American sources have confirmed that the US and Jordan have recently discussed the prospect of using the UN to offer a formal exile and amnesty package to Saddam and his inner circle.

Last month, Saddam rejected informal pleas to choose exile over war. But the US is aware that one of the attractions of an amendment that extends the offer to his family and military leaders is the likelihood it may trigger a coup, leading to his assassination by a member of his inner circle.

It is thought that Saddam's sons, Uday and Qusay, would push for a safe passage out rather than face a cataclysmic end in a Baghdad bunker. 'Uday might be the first to shoot his father if he refused an amnesty,' one senior Jordan official is quoted as saying.

The proposed amendment is still at a low rung on the UN procedural ladder but the non-permanent members believe it represents a last best chance to avert a war. But, from the Security Council's point of view, it offers a compromise that would allow its members to unite and vote for a second resolution.

UN sources have also indicated that a second resolution on Tuesday with the March 17 ultimatum -- incorporating an offer of exile -- would provide an attractive compromise that would let the French to come on board without 'losing face' or appearing to have capitulated to the US.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: exile; hussein; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last
To: GodBlessPeggyNoonan
I agree with you...GW is about results not process...sharing credit not hogging the spotlight...protecting innocent Iraqi lives and the lives of American soldiers...he's no fool...if this proposal goes down the US and Britain will play a pivotal role in helping to create a functioning government in Iraq...and we'll look like heroes doing it...the USA and Britain will also get some oil deals to help our economies and compensate us for our expenditures to date...I pray that Saddam steps down and war can be prevented.
161 posted on 03/09/2003 10:49:29 AM PST by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Becki
Didn't the Vatican do the same thing for the Nazis?

No. That is just anti-Papal propaganda.

162 posted on 03/09/2003 11:18:45 AM PST by Maeve (Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
LOL! You should Photoshop Saddam's face onto the biker from the Village People.
163 posted on 03/09/2003 11:41:54 AM PST by TheLurkerX ("When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro..." Hunter S. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Becki
Didn't the Vatican do the same thing for the Nazis? They are supposed to have ferreted numerous Nazi criminals out to safe haven to protect them from the big bad Allies.

No. They are "supposed" by whom? Where did your hear that one?

164 posted on 03/09/2003 7:24:21 PM PST by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Thirty six hours and counting. (From the post time)
165 posted on 03/09/2003 8:07:59 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
BTTT!
166 posted on 03/09/2003 10:04:45 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Truly pathetic. How does the United Naturists propose to enforce this pansy-ass farce?

And, would we trust the UN to do any of this? They sure haven't enforced any resolution in 12 years & 4 months!

167 posted on 03/09/2003 10:27:57 PM PST by blondee123 (WAR: Saddams choice, not ours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CarmelValleyite
IMHO, all the events of the past few months are no less ridiculous than the above scenario... I've given up trying to follow the UN/France/Germany ad nauseum shenanigans...

LOL... Patience is a virtue. I understand your frustration with this process. I'm glad our President has more patience than I do. The major fact probably is that the military buildup needed required most of this time anyway, and the UN nonsense has served at least one purpose (even if it is to unmask the UN) and may have as well been tried. It has not deterred our military timetable, and we'll go in when we are ready.

Patience.

168 posted on 03/10/2003 5:13:21 AM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete
Regardless of how problematic NK is for this administration, it is far more problematic for China. They do not want a nuclear Japan and possibly even Tiawan. They know they have a huge problem here, and will somehow get involved in time.

Certainly the remainder of the Axis of Evil (of which our President has only named three of the nodes) has other targets. Iran may take care of itself with a little shove, possibly simply the liberation of Iraq. The others will have to be dealt with over time, and with great patience.

169 posted on 03/10/2003 5:32:53 AM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson