[Jeff Chandler]

The treasonous rat bastard dickweed peckerhead media assault continues.

[FairOpinion]

The Associated Press is sounding more and more like an editorial by DU, than news reports.

For shame.

[RoseofTexas]

Let's face it folks, the AP is nothing by ANTI-BUSH!!! I hate those CLYMERS!! They'll do and say anything to sink our President!! God's harsh judgement will be their reward!!

[EvilOverlord]

Leaders who have openly supported Bush - British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, Australian Prime Minister John Howard - have found their positions increasingly at odds with public sentiment at home

Gee, and here I thought that Tony Blair's position was decreasingly at odds with the views of the British population. Didn't parliament just approve of his position by a large margin? Didn't the latest British polls show support for the war?

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

Let me understand something, this is supposed to be an "objective" article published by a "independent" news reporting organization?

Unbelievable.

I hope Mr. Murdoch buys them out.

[Mister Baredog]

Bush insists his pursuit of Saddam is not personal. But throughout much of the world, Bush is being held personally accountable for the march to war.

Gee I thought the rest of the world belonged to the UN that passed all resolutions that Iraq has defied. This is becoming more like a scene from ALICE IN WONDERLAND

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

Even so, Bush has gone to great lengths to personalize and demonize his enemies, especially alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and Saddam.

Has the world gone mad?

[AmericaUnited]

It pisses the left off so bad that they can't manipulate Bush with their BS stories like this one.

[American Soldier]

Two issues strike me, one which helps Bush's case and one which hurts it:

(1) Pointing out that members of his immediate family were targeted doesn't make it personal. Targeting ANY past or present Presidents or first family members (as well as any American, for that matter) is a terrorist act of war against the United States. I would feel the same (as much as I dislike them) if any of the Clintons or Carter were targeted. This is a matter of national solidarity.

(2) Kim Jong Il is directly implicated in international political assassination plots from the last 2 decades. If anything he is crazier and more evil the Saddam Hussein.

That said, Ted Kennedy's argument that we aren't paying them enough attention is complete B.S. Next the liberals will be complaining that conservatives aren't doing enough to stop Communist oppression in Vietnam.

[over3Owithabrain]

"The U.N. is a very noble institution. It's been here over 50 years. And it will continue to serve a purpose in the future," said Secretary of State Colin Powell.
And once again Colin Powell undercuts his country and his President with fawning praise for the UN. Still trying to dig his way out of the cesspool he led us into with his horrendous advice that Bush foolishly heeded over that of wiser men.

[jellybean]

Even so, Bush has gone to great lengths to personalize and demonize his enemies, especially alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and Saddam.

So, these guys aren't really evil...we just think they are because President Bush has waged a campaign to make them appear so.

These nice old gentlemen were sitting around minding their own business when bad old George Bush decided he wanted to start a war and started demonizing these sweet old men. What a big meanie!!

My gag reflex is getting such a workout these days.

[jellybean]

" Forcing Security Council members to publicly take sides "puts the other countries in a terrible position," Steinberg said.

Too f'ing bad!!! They had a choice whose side they wanted to be on...they chose the wrong one. They have only themselves to blame.

[Nexus]

alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden

WHAT???

[DeSoto]

(beginning of article)
President Bush, who came to power by a slim electoral margin and with little experience in foreign policy...............

This Tom Raum fella displays such skill in unbiased reporting, he subtly manages to slam President Bush twice in the first sentence.

How many times do we have to read - 'President Bush isn't the REAL president and he had no REAL experience in foreign policy' in order to understand that rest of the article's value lies in it's fertilizer potential.

Hey Baum! Gore lost! Get over it!

Second point, Texas is a very large state with a long common international border and has extensive foreign ties through its oil industry. In fact, President Bush has had extensive international ties through the oil industry. You want to add in the extensive exposure to foreign topics growing up the grandson of a senator, son of a congressman, CIA director, Vicepresident, and President?

Wanna bet that this Baum character never complained about Clintoon's foreign experience?

As for the rest of the article, I didn't bother. I have enough fertilizer, I don't need to wallow in more.

[Right to be Wrong]

Non sense, Mr. G.W. Bush proved to be 1000% more efficient in foreign affairs than Clinton ever was, regardless of his so called "LACK OF EXPERIENCE". You don't need experience, when you are a born leader. Actually, Bush has been so far, the best America has given in a long period of time. My prayers are with you Mr. Bush, with your family, and most of all with your country.

[Scott from the Left Coast]

Geez, that guy writes tripe.