Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Drive on Iraq Has Personal Overtones
AP ^ | March 8, 2003 | TOM RAUM

Posted on 03/08/2003 10:09:26 AM PST by Indy Pendance

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush, who came to power by a slim electoral margin and with little experience in foreign policy, suddenly finds himself in one of the deepest diplomatic crises of any recent American president.

Despite rising international opposition and without U.N. support, he is preparing to use U.S. force to disarm and depose Iraq's president, Saddam Hussein. Bush is staking his credibility - perhaps his presidency - on success in Iraq.

Bush insists his pursuit of Saddam is not personal. But throughout much of the world, Bush is being held personally accountable for the march to war.

"This is a war that has Bush's name on it, for better or worse," said pollster Andrew Kohut of the Pew Research Center.

Leaders who have openly supported Bush - British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi, Australian Prime Minister John Howard - have found their positions increasingly at odds with public sentiment at home.

A showdown comes this week in the U.N. Security Council as members weigh the consequences of opposing the United States.

Bush indicated in a prime-time television news conference last week that he would seek a U.N. war vote, even lacking the support to prevail.

In a late effort to make the resolution more palatable, the United States and Britain proposed giving Saddam until March 17 to comply with U.N. inspections or face war. Other Security Council members balked, with France threatening to use its veto.

Polls overseas show little support for military action now to disarm Iraq. Even Israel is deeply divided on the subject.

U.S. polls show that most Americans support Bush but would like the administration to win international backing before using force.

"For those who urge more diplomacy, I would simply say that diplomacy hasn't worked," Bush counters.

Many hawks want Bush to finish the job that his father began with the Persian Gulf War in 1991. But Bush insists there is nothing personal about his effort, even saying he did not feel any personal anger about an alleged Iraqi plot to kill members of his family with a car bomb during a 1993 visit to Kuwait.

"The fact that he tried to kill my father and my wife shows the nature of the man. He's cold-blooded," Bush said last week. "The decision I'm making and have made to disarm Saddam Hussein is based on the security of the American people."

Even so, Bush has gone to great lengths to personalize and demonize his enemies, especially alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and Saddam.

"I think he's in a personal contest of wills with Saddam Hussein. And he's determined not to blink first. And to that sense, it is personal," said David Albright, a former nuclear weapons inspector in Iraq. Despite Bush's rhetoric, "most people in the world want the inspection process to continue," Albright said.

James Steinberg, deputy national security adviser in the Clinton administration, said Bush had "made this more confrontational with the international community than he needed to." Forcing Security Council members to publicly take sides "puts the other countries in a terrible position," Steinberg said.

Some of Bush's certitude and self-confidence is seen in Europe and other parts of the world as American arrogance.

But European nations also have their own agendas and were becoming restive about growing U.S. power before Bush took office, said Andrew Kuchins of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

"My view is that we've handled this diplomatically in a very clumsy way, and we've really painted ourselves in a box. And I think we've needlessly alienated a lot of key allies and partners," Kuchins said.

Bush supporters say some way must be found around U.N. procrastination, and trans-Atlantic wounds will heal once Saddam is gone from power.

"The U.N. is a very noble institution. It's been here over 50 years. And it will continue to serve a purpose in the future," said Secretary of State Colin Powell.

---

EDITOR'S NOTE - Tom Raum has covered Washington for The Associated Press since 1973, including five presidencies.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Has the world gone mad?

Yes.

21 posted on 03/08/2003 10:43:21 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"The U.N. is a very noble institution. It's been here over 50 years. And it will continue to serve a purpose in the future," said Secretary of State Colin Powell.
And once again Colin Powell undercuts his country and his President with fawning praise for the UN. Still trying to dig his way out of the cesspool he led us into with his horrendous advice that Bush foolishly heeded over that of wiser men.
22 posted on 03/08/2003 10:43:49 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Even so, Bush has gone to great lengths to personalize and demonize his enemies, especially alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden, North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and Saddam.

So, these guys aren't really evil...we just think they are because President Bush has waged a campaign to make them appear so.

These nice old gentlemen were sitting around minding their own business when bad old George Bush decided he wanted to start a war and started demonizing these sweet old men. What a big meanie!!

My gag reflex is getting such a workout these days.

23 posted on 03/08/2003 10:43:50 AM PST by jellybean (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1979763521 The Clinton Legacy Cookbook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
My sentiment exactly. This drivel is not news at all. It is merely an editorial opinion.
24 posted on 03/08/2003 10:44:02 AM PST by NautiNurse (Usama bin Laden has produced more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
To the lake of fire with the devil, who is working through the media. Let's wait for soon there is got to be a 180, the media has got to recover their sanity. In the meantime, it is only truth that prevails, so their lies are already defeated. This internal war in the U.S.A. is about who stands with right/light and who will choose wrong/darkness. America will be saved, sanity and right thinking always have won.
25 posted on 03/08/2003 10:47:30 AM PST by Hila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: American Soldier
I would feel the same (as much as I dislike them) if any of the Clintons or Carter were targeted. This is a matter of national

I agree, as much as I think Carter and Clinton have damaged this country, they were our presidents, and there should be hell to pay if anyone tried to harm them. I believe I heard this week that Clinton was a target of assasination. Did anyone else hear this? I think it was al Qaeda who tried.
26 posted on 03/08/2003 10:52:07 AM PST by baseballmom (Valley Forge Rally - 3/16/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
" Forcing Security Council members to publicly take sides "puts the other countries in a terrible position," Steinberg said.

Too f'ing bad!!! They had a choice whose side they wanted to be on...they chose the wrong one. They have only themselves to blame.

27 posted on 03/08/2003 10:52:11 AM PST by jellybean (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1979763521 The Clinton Legacy Cookbook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
alleged terror mastermind Osama bin Laden

WHAT???

28 posted on 03/08/2003 10:52:15 AM PST by Nexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
(beginning of article)
President Bush, who came to power by a slim electoral margin and with little experience in foreign policy...............

This Tom Raum fella displays such skill in unbiased reporting, he subtly manages to slam President Bush twice in the first sentence.

How many times do we have to read - 'President Bush isn't the REAL president and he had no REAL experience in foreign policy' in order to understand that rest of the article's value lies in it's fertilizer potential.

Hey Baum! Gore lost! Get over it!

Second point, Texas is a very large state with a long common international border and has extensive foreign ties through its oil industry. In fact, President Bush has had extensive international ties through the oil industry. You want to add in the extensive exposure to foreign topics growing up the grandson of a senator, son of a congressman, CIA director, Vicepresident, and President?

Wanna bet that this Baum character never complained about Clintoon's foreign experience?

As for the rest of the article, I didn't bother. I have enough fertilizer, I don't need to wallow in more.

29 posted on 03/08/2003 11:02:39 AM PST by DeSoto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Non sense, Mr. G.W. Bush proved to be 1000% more efficient in foreign affairs than Clinton ever was, regardless of his so called "LACK OF EXPERIENCE". You don't need experience, when you are a born leader. Actually, Bush has been so far, the best America has given in a long period of time. My prayers are with you Mr. Bush, with your family, and most of all with your country.
30 posted on 03/08/2003 11:30:42 AM PST by Right to be Wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: RoseofTexas
Ooops...by=but, I think I need a cola! :)
32 posted on 03/08/2003 11:37:42 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Geez, that guy writes tripe.
33 posted on 03/08/2003 11:38:47 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I like Pres Bush and I am glad he is president and not Al Gore. I agree that diplomacy will not make Saddam disarm, only force or the threat of it will make him do it. But a different approach of diplomacy should have been used with garnering support for the war. I think going to the UN for most of the diplomatic effort was a big mistake and Bush is wasting our time and money right now. He should have worked behind the scenes with heads of state in Europe to get support. Some of them, like Germany, may still have not gone along anyway, but Germany doesn't have a vote on the security council. It was a mistake to work through the UN, there are too many bad guys in the UN. It has only given a forum for anti-American voices of people like Joscka Fischer and SH.
34 posted on 03/08/2003 11:52:26 AM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: virgil
I can understand what you mean. I don't know WHY he/they did this; looking back, it wasn't such a hot plan.

Perhaps he didn't realize France wanted to be King of the Mountain.
35 posted on 03/08/2003 11:55:32 AM PST by Howlin (Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Howie; Grampa Dave
I just went into WordPad and made great home made bumper stickers. I set it to "landscape" (sideways), at 72 point type, bolded, with .2" margins. I get two bumper stickers out of each sheet of regular paper that say

Only UNamerican / put the U.N. / before America!

It's all centered up, on three lines of big wide type. It goes all the way across the 11" sheet of paper. Two per page (six lines of type total), and I made extras to give to people. A few little tabs of 3M brand Magic Tape will attach it to the inside bottom of my back window, even after months in the sun 3M Magic Tape peels off cleanly with zero glue residue. They are exactly the size of a normal bumper sticker, but in black and white on regular paper to go inside a window.

36 posted on 03/08/2003 3:04:08 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't think he imagined for a second that France and Germany would do what they have done.

Few Americans understand the mortal threat that the EU poses, even fewer sons of transnationalist Presidents who have been to Yale understand it.

I love GWB, but God isn't finished with him yet.

37 posted on 03/08/2003 3:09:54 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Shameless link to merchandise

 

38 posted on 03/08/2003 4:22:23 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
click
39 posted on 03/08/2003 4:30:44 PM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

For a file that prints out 32" x 48" on your large-format printer or Kinko's, freepmail.

40 posted on 03/08/2003 4:51:36 PM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson