This was published last week, but I just stumbled on it and couldn't find it posted to FR. Something to worry about?
To: FastNBulbous
Good Lord, the Saudis are going to own controlling interest in a company that provides absentee ballots to U.S. troops! Now, how effed up is that?!
2 posted on
03/04/2003 10:07:01 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: FastNBulbous
In a Newsday interview in October, Charles Smith, a representative of Osan who sits on Election.com's board, declined to name the Saudi Arabian investors with a stake in the company, other than to say they were "passive and part of a larger group that included Americans and Europeans. Smith didn't return phone calls Wednesday. Let me quess .. Friends of the Clinton's
3 posted on
03/04/2003 10:11:05 AM PST by
Mo1
(Free Miguel Estrata !!!)
To: FastNBulbous
Now WHY wound the Saudis want to get into a company that just might DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF AN ELECTION?
4 posted on
03/04/2003 10:26:33 AM PST by
OXENinFLA
To: FastNBulbous
Good find.
This is clearly beyond outrageous. The Saudi terrorists of 9-11 and today study American society for all its weaknesses. Wherever they spot a weakness, they will attempt to exploit it.
We should have a law, and if there is not one there should be, that there can be no foreign ownership in any part of any election related business including voting machines, online voting services, election polling and the like.
I am still wary of software controlled voting machines. Officials seem to think that a test program will prevent fraud, but they are wrong. As was discussed on FR at length during the Election 2000 fiasco, a ballot coded in a rare way can be used to trigger software code to count differently.
5 posted on
03/04/2003 10:28:34 AM PST by
Hostage
To: FastNBulbous
The Wahabbi Lobby strikes again...
moderate islam the trojan horse for real thing
7 posted on
03/04/2003 10:39:25 AM PST by
joesnuffy
To: FastNBulbous
In a Newsday interview in October, Charles Smith, a representative of Osan who sits on Election.com's board, declined to name the Saudi Arabian investors with a stake in the company, other than to say they were "passive and part of a larger group that included Americans and Europeans. Would that group include Frogs, Krauts and DemonRATs?
11 posted on
03/04/2003 10:53:52 AM PST by
steveegg
(The Surgeon General has determined that siding with Al-Qaeda is hazardous to your continued rule.)
To: FastNBulbous
Good LORD! Switch companies!! NOW!!
I'm sorry for how prejudicial this sounds, but I don't want nationals from Saudi, whos' FELLOW nationals attacked the WTC and Pentagon on 9/11 to have ANYTHING TO DO WITH AMERICAN ELECTIONS!! That Saudi prince blamed the US for 9/11! They hold benefits for terrorists!
15 posted on
03/04/2003 11:40:13 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
To: FastNBulbous
INSANITY BUMP
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Have you seen this?
23 posted on
03/04/2003 6:38:18 PM PST by
getgoing
To: supercat; Shermy
Bump
25 posted on
03/04/2003 8:43:31 PM PST by
Revel
To: FastNBulbous
outrageous bump
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson