Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Behind the Headlines: NK Intercept of Spy Plane Reveals Careful Planning, Allied Mistakes
Self | 3/4/03 | Self

Posted on 03/04/2003 8:56:20 AM PST by Spook86

North Korea's recent intercept of a U.S. RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft was a carefully planned operation that brought four of its MiG fighters dangerously close to the American aircraft. However, the incident also highlighted proceedural errors that allowed the MiGs to close within 100 feet of the RC-135. The reverberations from this incident will be felt throughout the intelligence community and likely prompt a major review of RC-135 employment tactics.

Officially, the U.S. has acknowledged that NK fighters closed to within 50 feet of the reconniassance aircraft as it flew over the Sea of Japan last weekend. The Pentagon also revealed that the RC-135 in question was not a Rivet Joint platform that performs signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection against targeted countries. Instead, the RC-135 intercepted last weekend was a Cobra Ball variant, specially configured to monitor ballistic missile tests. According to unclassified sources, there are only a handful of these aircraft in existence. Based at Eielson AFB, Alaska, Cobra Ball deploys when a missile test appears imminent. The presence of Cobra Ball over the Sea of Japan last weekend indicates that North Korea's threatened test of a Tapeodong-2 missile may soon become a reality. It seems unlikely that the aircraft was conducting a training mission in the area, given recent tnesions between the U.S. and North Korea, and the restrictive ROE (rules of engagement) that govern RC-135 ops against that country.

As the RC-135 waited for a possible missile test, North Korean fighters did something they haven't done in more than 30 years--closing to within a few yards of a U.S. reconniassance aircraft. This is remarkable, for several reasons. First, the aircraft involved in the incident (MiG-23s and MiG-29s) typically don't respond to our recce flights over the Sea of Japan. These fighters--the best NK has in its inventory--are normally based near Pyongyang, on the western side of the Korean Peninsula. Their ability to close rapidly on the RC-135 suggests they were deployed to a base on the eastern coast, in preparation for the intercept.

It's also unusual for NK pilots to intercept a target more than 150 miles off their coast. Steeped in Soviet-style tactics, NK pilots require extensive assistance from ground controllers in finding their targets. That means lots of radio traffic and/or datalink signals between air and ground, normally detected by U.S. intelligence assets. Those signals, coupled with radar tracking, provide a "heads up" about NK intentions, and provide a warning for RC-135 crews.

Clearly, something went wrong last weekend. Four NK MiGs were able to navigate their way to the RC-135 and the crew didn't have sufficent time to retrograde from their orbit. That's a key point, because (as noted previously) RC-135 ROE for Korean missions are extremely stringent. At any sign of hostile intent, crews are supposed to terminate their mission and retrograde to "safe" airspace. The Pentagon hasn't revealed how the NK pilots managed this feat, but I'm guessing a "comm out" launch from an east coast base in the DPRK, followed by a high-speed run to the target.

Needless to say, there are a lot of red faces about this incident on the American side. In defense of the Cobra Ball crew, it should be noted that their aircraft does not have the same SIGNIT suite as Rivet Joint, and it is not geared toward detecting/monitoring tactical fighter activity. However, platforms like Cobra Ball are supported by other intel assets that provide flight following and tactical warning of emerging threats. Clearly, that warning was lacking over the Sea of Japan.

One final note: the U.S., at one time, maintained fighters on alert in Korea for the purpose of protecting reconnaissance aircraft. However, this mission was discontinued in the late 1990s, due to the "decreased" threat from North Korea. South Korean fighters still pull air defense alert on the peninsula, and that begs another question: why weren't ROKAF F-16s or F-4s scrambled in defense of Cobra Ball.

The post-mortem on this incident has already begun, and steps will be taken to prevent something like this from happening again. Beyond the headlines, the NK Air Force pulled off a daring intercept last weekend, an intercept based on extensive planning and precise execution. It was a carefully calibrated move, designed to rachet up tensions a bit more, and remind Washington that the crisis in Korea has not been resolved. The incident also underscores that Pyongyang is prepared to raise tensions again, by testing a Tapeodong-2 missile in the near future. That likely scenario will mean another call for Cobra Ball--and the potential for another incident over the Sea of Japan.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; militaryreadiness; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Just a little insight into some of the implications of the RC-135 incident, from someone who's been there.
1 posted on 03/04/2003 8:56:20 AM PST by Spook86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Thanks for a look at the story between the lines.
2 posted on 03/04/2003 9:00:08 AM PST by jwfiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
If we suspected a REAL lauch (an attatck, not a test) was about to take place, wouldn't the plane's ROE be stronger? I can see running for cover if you think they are just testing, but what if you think the nutjobs might put one up for real?
3 posted on 03/04/2003 9:03:00 AM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Torie; Jeff Head; longshadow; Grampa Dave
Another ping along those lines.



4 posted on 03/04/2003 9:08:47 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Doesn't "Behind the Headlines" clash with "Breaking News"?

;-)

5 posted on 03/04/2003 9:09:56 AM PST by newgeezer (I'm a native American. Aren't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Thanks for the learned input.
6 posted on 03/04/2003 9:11:22 AM PST by DoctorMichael ("Pacifism.......is Pro-Fascist" ~~~~~George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Looks like we're blind in one eye and can't see out of the other.
7 posted on 03/04/2003 9:12:23 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Good morning, Mr. Benson...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
The fact the NKs could pull this off so smoothly should give us some pause in our assuptions of their capabilities and intentions.

On the bright side, the fact they didn't shoot down the -135 shows they are being somewhat cautious about an incident which would undoubtedly have led immediately to war.

8 posted on 03/04/2003 9:14:14 AM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Spook86
Thanks. Posts like this are why I love Free Republic.
10 posted on 03/04/2003 9:17:09 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86; WatchNKorea
BTTT
11 posted on 03/04/2003 9:17:16 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Perhaps...but the TD-2 isn't fully operational (yet), so there would be no reason to expect an attack under these circumstances. If we thought the NKs WERE about to attack, we'd have every ISR sensor focused on the peninsula, with continuous coverage by SIGINT Rivet Joint platforms.
12 posted on 03/04/2003 9:18:00 AM PST by Spook86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
This is all a part of the PRC's plan to get the US out of Korea and, eventually, out of the Pacific.
13 posted on 03/04/2003 9:18:23 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
Excellent post. I'd agree that this is very unusual. The North Koreans don't get a fraction of as much training in ground controlled intercepts as, say, other large Asian communist countries, and yet they pulled off a flawless intercept.

They have obviously been waiting for some time, and if the Cobra Ball has been flying in a discernable pattern, they likely were able to project in advance where it would be at a certain time. If the North Koreans haven't been agressively intercepting for the last 30 years, complacency may have set in on our side.

One way or another, seeing North Koreans on the wing must have freaked them out. I know people that see Chinese fighters on a regular basis, and they still find it a little unnerving. Seeing four DPRK Migs closing at full throttle must have been sheer terror.

14 posted on 03/04/2003 9:21:26 AM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
as an old Navy Recce Dog (EP-3's, EA-3s) I'd say Spook86's analysis is right on. back when the Libyan's were giving us a hard time flying below the "Line of Death", we started flying with armed F-14 CAP at points on our track, and A-7's with AIM-9's flying along side. seems like time to revisit that tactic.
15 posted on 03/04/2003 9:25:54 AM PST by fly_navy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Perhaps they weren't North Korean pilots in the seats of those fighters; maybe Chinese pilots are getting some training...
16 posted on 03/04/2003 9:27:49 AM PST by CHATTAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
That's a key point, because (as noted previously) RC-135 ROE for Korean missions are extremely stringent. At any sign of hostile intent, crews are supposed to terminate their mission and retrograde to "safe" airspace.

Maybe the boys at NSA are so worried over an upcoming launch that they don't want to bug out unless there is actual shooting.

17 posted on 03/04/2003 9:28:41 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
It's also unusual for NK pilots to intercept a target more than 150 miles off their coast. Steeped in Soviet-style tactics, NK pilots require extensive assistance from ground controllers in finding their targets. That means lots of radio traffic and/or datalink signals between air and ground, normally detected by U.S. intelligence assets. Those signals, coupled with radar tracking, provide a "heads up" about NK intentions, and provide a warning for RC-135 crews.
One explanation for the lack of warning, of course, could be that the intercept took place less than 150 miles off the NK coast.
18 posted on 03/04/2003 9:29:30 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
I agree, ROKAF F-16s or F-4s scrambled in defense of Cobra Ball should be an automatic option, which we need as a measured option to these types of shenannigans by NK. Fighter escorts OTOH would escalate the situation which is exactly what NK wants.

19 posted on 03/04/2003 9:31:48 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spook86
bush should provide fighter escort for cobra ball near korea
20 posted on 03/04/2003 9:31:53 AM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson