HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?

The Iconoclast ^ | March 03, 2003 | The Iconoclast

[Apolitical]

HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?.......



March 3, 2003: Have you forgotten? .....

CLICK HERE FOR MORE

[exnavy]

"tangentially related"

What about the dozen or so 9/11 hijackers that trained just south of Bagdad to take control of the airliner cockpits?

[Belial]

What about the dozen or so 9/11 hijackers that trained just south of Bagdad to take control of the airliner cockpits?

Link?

[TracyPA]

They should show the attack on the WTC for 24 hours before we go into Iraq. Some people have very short memories.

[Calpernia]

I wish there was a way to capture that smell we lived with for months. Thick dusty dirt mixed with moist burned flesh. THEN knowing some that belonged to that smell.

[Calpernia]

Never forget

AND DON'T FORGET

[exnavy]

Hang tight, I saw it right here on FR. Searching.

[Calpernia]

Never Forget:

Never Forget:

[walkingdead]

(It's love it or leave it time in America again.)

I love your tag line, so very true.....

[exnavy]

www.mideastweb.org/iraq.htm for starters, or a google search for "hijackers trained in Iraq" yealds amazing results.

[Calpernia]

Sabah Khalifa Khodada Alami even reported about the boeing they trained on in Salman Pak area of Baghdad. Why didn't the inspectors go there?

[exnavy]

They don't want to find any incriminating evidence.

[jwalsh07]

Salman Pak, Abu Nidal, Abu Abbas, money transfers to Hamas, Hezbollah, bounty for dead Israelis and Americans, Zarqawi, Ansar al-Islam, Mujahedeen-e-Khalq, Kurdistan Workers’ Party ....

The list is endless.

[Belial]

www.mideastweb.org/iraq.htm for starters, or a google search for "hijackers trained in Iraq" yealds amazing results.

My friend, a third-rate website making an unsupported claim hardly proves that Iraq trained the hijackers to storm airliner cabins. Don't you realize this would be MAJOR news if there were any proof? Even the cheesy website you cited was honest enough to say

However, the US government has yet (September 2002) to release any official document providing evidence that links Saddam to Al-Qaeada or the World Trade Center attack.

[exnavy]

Did you try that google search?

[Belial]

The list is endless.

Doubtless. Iraq supports terror. So does Bush's friend, the prince of Saudi Arabia.

But who is, and isn't, a terrorist isn't what I was arguing. I don't think it's appropriate to use the victims of 9/11 to drum up support for an unrelated war. Plain and simple.

[Belial]

Did you try that google search?

When someone makes an extraordinary claim, the burden of proof rests upon themselves to support it.

If I claimed Lord Krshna visited San Francisco today, I wouldn't assume you'd have the time (or the inclination) to dredge around the web looking for manifestations.

[exnavy]

You sir are starting to sound like a frenchman.

[Belial]

You sir are starting to sound like a frenchman.

All I'm requesting is a bit of sobriety in the midst of this war frenzy.

[Frapster]

ut who is, and isn't, a terrorist isn't what I was arguing. I don't think it's appropriate to use the victims of 9/11 to drum up support for an unrelated war. Plain and simple.

Let's review the scenarios. This is all based on the fact that we are at war against terrorism as a result of 9/11. We know that Saudi Arabia (Bush's so-called friend according to you) is a major backer of these terrorists. So is Iran. a) we go after Saudi Arabia first and effectively lose access to the two largest oil reserves in the world. b) we go after Iran first which most certainly has the risk for war. With Iraq already in the mix it's a tougher and costlier fight and we run the risk of losing Saudi Arabia's oil because they will most certainly know that they are in line (before or after Iraq) and could precipitate a wider war c) we go after Iraq, and not tansentially, but directly as a known but lesser supporter of terrorism while NOT advertising that we will deal with these other countries NEXT. We've now secured the 2nd largest oil fields in the world, have half a million of our military ready to address other terrorist supporters (or at least intimidate) and we have a much stronger point of leverage in the region.

I choose C.

[exnavy]

I personally don't believe we are in a "war frenzy"

I do believe there is plenty of evidence of Saddam harboring/assisting terrorists.

I know there is overwhelming, blatant, evidence the butcher of Bagdad has violated the terms of the ceasefire from the first time we kicked his hiney.

And this may very well prove to be the shortest "war" in the history of the world.