Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. braces for financial hit from war, protests (Couldn't Happen To a Nicer City!)
San Francisco Examiner ^ | February 28, 2003 | Adriel Hampton

Posted on 03/02/2003 1:13:33 AM PST by Dont Mention the War

Publication date: 02/28/2003

S.F. braces for financial hit from war, protests

BY ADRIEL HAMPTON
Of The Examiner Staff

    A war with Iraq and local antiwar demonstrations would do great damage to The City's already tenuous finances, city officials said.

    "We already have a $350 million deficit. How are we going to pay for this?" City Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval said. "(President) Bush seems to be oblivious to the problems in the localities. I'm sure this problem is very widespread from Philadelphia to Denver to San Francisco, but I don't see a bailout plan for the cities."

    Deputy Police Chief of Operations Greg Suhr said a prolonged war and accompanying protests could bankrupt the police department's contingency funds. Besides the cost of public safety, the city controller's office estimates a war would cut $15 million to $25 million in current revenues from a budget already hundreds of millions in the red.

    P.J. Johnston, spokesman for Mayor Willie Brown, said even a simple peace march like the two recent antiwar demonstrations costs The City up to $120,000 a day.

    "Protests and peaceful demonstrations are an important part of civic participation, so it is appropriate that people gather in San Francisco, but The City is currently absorbing an enormous cost with no help from the federal government," Johnston said.

    Groups opposed to an attack on Iraq are planning massive displays of civil disobedience in San Francisco, ranging from blockading the entrances to public buildings to shutting down key intersections and blocking traffic with disabled vehicles.

    The group Direct Action to Stop the War is calling for crowds to gather downtown the morning after a U.S. attack on Iraq and shut The City down through nonviolent protest, an effort supported by other peace groups now focused on preventing a war.

    "On the day that they start dropping bombs, Powell and Market at 5 p.m. is going to be full of thousands and thousands of people who want direction," Maya Jones of the anti-war organization Not in Our Name told The Examiner.

    That protest, unlike the permitted events that have clogged downtown streets and plazas in the past month, will challenge police officers to respond quickly.

    Suhr said city officials have also been working with the courts and civil liberties groups on how to handle mass arrests. The Feb. 16 war protest in San Francisco, where a splinter group caused short-lived havoc in the Financial District, led to nearly 50 arrests and eight protesters held on felony charges. Demonstrators allegedly attacked a police horse and jumped onto a moving cable car.

    Suhr said the Police Department is mobilizing resources to quell the expected massive anti-war demonstrations.

    "We have contingency plans in place. We have a complement of officers who measure about 60 who will be brought in on 12-hour days in case of a U.S. attack on Iraq," Greg Suhr, deputy police chief of operation, told The Examiner.

    Sandoval suggested the National Guard could be brought in to assist city police.

    "I don't mean to be alarmist, but to the extent that we can use the National Guard, we should think about it," Sandoval said. "If the danger is really that high, I think the federal government and the governor's office have a responsibility to help local agencies."

    Spokespeople for various local and state agencies confirmed that plans call first for response by local officers, leading up to an area-wide call up of police and the California Highway Patrol and, if necessary, the National Guard.

    The California guard, which needs an order from the governor to go into action, last mobilized to handle civil disobedience in response to the Los Angeles race riots in 1992.

    CHP spokesman Tom Marshall said California, because of its high number of protests and natural disasters such as earthquakes, is used to handling such emergencies.

    "We have a lot of experience in planning, gearing up and reacting to these types of things," Marshall said.

    Sandoval has called for a public hearing on the costs and neighborhood impacts of a war.

    Mayor Brown is also lobbying the federal government for homeland security funding. Increased security costs have been in the tens of millions since Sept. 11, 2001, Johnston said.

    Sandoval, who voted with the majority of city supervisors to oppose an Iraq war without U.N. backing, said the war's impact on The City's finances makes it a local issue.

    "A lot of people say the Board of Supervisors has no business engaging in foreign policy, but when it affects our bottom line it is our business and every citizen in San Francisco should be concerned about it," Sandoval said.

    E-mail: ahampton@examiner.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: magua
It is the responsiblity of a democratic government to provide for the will of the people. If the people of SFO wish to use that money for peace marches and demonstrations instead of housing, city maintence or medical care then that should be their decision. The mayor should tell people of the cost of their actions and they should respond in a democratic manner.

The people who are sitting on their hands should be mande aware of the consequences of their actions as well.

21 posted on 03/02/2003 4:42:10 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
You wrote exactly what I was thinking.

The city officials should let all the SF taxpayers know the realities of 'protecting the rights of free speech.' Let the taxpayers decide how much 'tolerance' they are willing to underwrite.

Of course, it is much easier just to blame George Bush.
22 posted on 03/02/2003 4:49:05 AM PST by maica (Anti-tyranny Activist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
Bush is paying attention to his job, which is the defense of the nation, not supporting a dried up old whore of a city.
23 posted on 03/02/2003 4:54:20 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Free Republic Highlights 3/2/03
24 posted on 03/02/2003 5:09:25 AM PST by I Am Not A Mod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
but I don't see a bailout plan for the cities."
Gee, when did the feds become the piggy bank for cities that live beyond their means?
I am sure that San Francisco could save the equivelant to their deficit by suspending funding for "social" programs.
1. Stop giving benefits to the homosexual partners.
2. Stop funding homeless programs that don't work.
3. Suspend funding that is used to validate and prop up deviant behavior.

The amount that cities such as San Francisco spend to legitimize social deviant behavior has caused the deficit, not the war.
25 posted on 03/02/2003 5:41:41 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
I wrote the author of this piece, asking what reason would the Bush Administration have for bailing out a city which delights in hosting anti-government war policies. Also, I said why would he want to help a city which is firmly in the hands of the Democrats?

I closed with the old saying: You made your bed. Lie in it.
26 posted on 03/02/2003 6:04:20 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
There you go. A daily pro-war protest that costs the city $120K would drain the city budget of $43,800,000 in a year. Maybe it would be possible to bankrupt them.
27 posted on 03/02/2003 6:47:42 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
"San Francisco Examiner" always reminds me of proctology. :~)
28 posted on 03/02/2003 7:06:59 AM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
..... but The City is currently absorbing an enormous cost with no help from the federal government

SF passed an anti-war resolution and now they want the same government they're protesting to help pay for the protests?

"On the day that they start dropping bombs, Powell and Market at 5 p.m. is going to be full of thousands and thousands of people who want direction,"

No problem. Just point them towards the bay.

29 posted on 03/02/2003 7:27:22 AM PST by barker ( I live in my own little world. But it's OK. They know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Preservative; SeenTheLight
Ping
30 posted on 03/02/2003 9:14:11 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
I agree. I hope they bankrupt this city, and I live here.

I have contingency plans. If they stop busses from running I'm walking to work, though it's far. It will take about 1 hour to 1 1/2 hours to get to work.

And I walk home from work every day anyways. So I can do it and pretty much avoid the steep hills on the way to work.

I also have a bicycle (currently with flat tires) that I can use, maybe I better get that to the bike shop and fixed so I can get around.
31 posted on 03/02/2003 9:16:58 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
It really pisses me off that we taxpayers have to pay for the protesters vandalism, destruction, and acts of civil disobedience. Time to email the stupervisors, mayor, ect!

ANSWER should have to cover the costs. They can get the money from their buddies in N. Korea.

32 posted on 03/02/2003 11:15:56 AM PST by SeenTheLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Can I send the protestors some gasoline? I just want to help them express themselves.
33 posted on 03/02/2003 9:41:03 PM PST by Jimbaugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson