The sperm was alive before it got to the egg, which was also already alive. Therefore...
Therefore the combination of two alive things create something not alive?
you're argument is totally without merit because you are apparently genome challenged.
Soemthing alive grows ... .
You: "The sperm was alive before it got to the egg, which was also already alive. Therefore...
Therefore it is ALIVE and the beginning of a human being! I can't imagine why you use "biblewonk" as a moniker since you obviously don't take His word seriously.
The question of when life begins is a scientific one that is well settled. It begins at conception. jwalsh07
The sperm was alive before it got to the egg, which was also already alive. Therefore... 26 posted by biblewonk
What jwalsh07 posted to you is absolutely accurate and you knew the context in which it was offered, that the conceptus is an individual human life begun at conception, not the haploid gametes or sex cells. Your sneaky effort to equate the sex cell (only 23 chromosomes) with the conceptus (46 chromosomes and a self-directing entity seeking survival in its environment, as opposed to the sex cell which is not seeking survival) is atleast disingenuous and at most a nihilist's way to discredit the individuality of the newly conceived individual human being that is the conceptus. So, what was your intent with that twisting, mischaracterization of jwalsh07's post?