Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Korea joins the 'axis of independence'
Atimes. | 2/26/03 | John Feffer

Posted on 02/25/2003 10:25:26 AM PST by Enemy Of The State

South Korea joins the 'axis of independence' By John Feffer (Republished with permission from Foreign Policy In Focus)

Roh Moo-hyun, the incoming South Korean president, is part of a trend that raises the hackles of the administration of US President George W Bush. The United States now has another outspoken and uncowed "ally". Roh joins an axis of independence that includes France's Jacques Chirac and Germany's Gerhard Schroeder. With friends like these, the Bush team laments, who needs an axis of evil? What's bad for Bush, however, is a boon for the rest of the world and particularly for the Korean Peninsula. Roh Moo-hyun is the world's best hope for avoiding war in East Asia.

Roh Moo-hyun is a true outsider, a lawyer who never went to college or law school and passed the fiendishly difficult bar exam through his own efforts. He defended students and labor leaders, the key organizers of South Korea's democratization movement, and went on to serve in the legislature. Considerably younger than outgoing president Kim Dae-jung, Roh is a spokesman for the influential generation that graduated from college in the 1980s and is fed up with the Cold War that lingers on the peninsula.

Many Koreans hope that Roh's independence will enable him to sweep away South Korea's endemic corruption and put economic reform on a more solid foundation. The big corporations have already shown signs of early capitulation by dropping their opposition to class-action suits in the financial world - a much-needed step in the direction of greater transparency.

But it is foreign policy where Roh will make his mark. The new president is even more committed than the previous administration to a policy of engaging North Korea. He favors moving forward with North-South reconciliation even before the current nuclear crisis is resolved.

Roh's inauguration on Tuesday came at a crucial time. The Bush administration has so far refused to negotiate with Pyongyang and has developed military plans to accomplish the regime change that malign neglect has so far failed to accomplish. Though it still adheres marginally to a peace constitution, Japan has announced that it too would launch a preemptive attack if it thought North Korea were about to strike first. And North Korea, apparently moving forward with its nuclear program, has made repeated threats of its own, including withdrawal from the 1953 Armistice agreement that ended the Korean War.

Trigger fingers are getting itchy in East Asia, and only Roh Moo-hyun clings tenaciously to an olive branch. A US "military strike against North Korea is an extremely serious matter that could lead to a war on the peninsula", he has said. "So I oppose even a review of such a possibility." Roh knows that war would bring untold death and destruction to South Korea. And North Korea's collapse would burden his country with refugees and economic and political challenges that dwarf what West Germany faced more than a decade ago.

US war plans have traditionally relied on South Korea to provide military support and to establish political control in the event of a North Korean collapse. As such, Roh's pacifist tendencies put more than a speed bump between the United States and full-scale war on the Korean Peninsula.

But that's not all. Roh wants Uncle Sam to stop treating his country like an untrustworthy teenager. The Status of Forces Agreement between the two countries (which establishes the conditions for US military presence in South Korea) is woefully lopsided when compared with similar US agreements with other countries such as Germany. In the recent demonstrations around the accidental killing of two Korean schoolgirls by US soldiers, tens of thousands of South Koreans gave vent to years of pent-up frustration and anger.

Neither Roh, nor the majority of the demonstrators in South Korea, are anti-American. They, like anti-war protesters in New York and London, oppose specific US policies. They are part of a worldwide reaction to the unilateralism of the Bush administration. If the current administration continues along its current path, the axis of independence may expand to include all US allies.

Roh is no stranger to uphill battles. He pulled off a stunning upset victory in the December elections. Now, facing even longer odds in the international arena, he is simultaneously trying to establish peace with North Korea and negotiate a more just relationship with the United States. Kim Dae-jung's Nobel Peace Prize is a tough act to follow. If Roh pulls off these two foreign-policy feats, he will set the stage for a more profound prize: a peaceful, unified Korea.

John Feffer is the author of Shock Waves: Eastern Europe After the Revolutions and the editor of the forthcoming Power Trip: US Foreign Policy After September 11 (Seven Stories, 2003). He has recently returned from three years based in Tokyo working on East Asian issues. Feffer is also an advisory committee member of Foreign Policy in Focus , a joint program of the Interhemispheric Resource Center and the Institute for Policy Studies. This article is republished with permission.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: korea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: L,TOWM
I think you misunderstand. The vast majority of ROKs like Americans, appreciate our help, and want us to stay. That doesn't mean they necessarily like the often condescending and boorish (and sometimes criminal) behavior exhibited by GIs, but they're much too polite to say so.

They have their loudmouths, of course, just like we do. They demonstrate and make lots of noise, and get lots of publicity. That doesn't make them representative of ROK public opinion.

Recognize also that 30 years ago it was estimated the North Koreans had 80,000 agents in the South. I'm sure they're well trained at agitprop and miss no chance to foment dissent and to stick a thumb in the US collective eye.

I can vividly recall going hiking out in the country, away from the US bases where rude, drunken GIs had already made an indelible impression. I was regularly invited into homes for drink, food and conversation. Regular folks liked us quite well, and were very friendly.

21 posted on 02/25/2003 12:52:03 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: CobaltBlue
Korea is a cold war example of two strategies, the first containment of communism, the second was the building of democratic industralized country - as an example to others....

I spent 9 years in the Korea/Japan and did my college language in Korea; an Asian Studies degree. Korea negotiated a Status of Forces Agreement with the US, and it renegotiated yearly or thereabouts.

While the entire nation is upset, this "upset" was stoked as ROH ran his election campaign against the US in a protest fashion, which is the only form of politics he understands, e.g., student protests against government -- and this time being part of incumbent government he ran agains the USA. Germany did the same thing. President Bush has already decided how to handle those who flaunt their "independence" by whipping up their populations against Americans at time when America is leading the West's war on terrorism - which is to not do anything for these country's politicians that is "optional" but rather only do what is required between the nations. Korea and Germany have both learned what the cold shoulder is.... One of Korea's great National fears is Japan becoming a military giant; the fact that the USA has basically given Japan's the greenlight to loosen restraints in the post-WWII Constitution to rearm with offensive weapons. Japan will force North Korea, Russia and China to rethink their belecose military intimidations, and will also give South Korea another chance to rethink their "anger" against the USA. S.Korea is already swinging pro-American and now ROH is backpeddeling on previous statements claiming he was misquoted (NOT).

America doesn't have to maintain troops in S.Korea but does need to keep a presence in the Pacific as tensions will be high there indefinately... and because America's future both politically and economically is turning to Asia from Europe and the Middle East:)

23 posted on 02/25/2003 1:20:02 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Bring the boys home. Lets see if South Korea can defend itself.
24 posted on 02/25/2003 3:23:13 PM PST by Sparta (Statism is a Mental Illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Actually, this staement in the article is simply wrong. I won't call it a lie, that would imply knowing intent to decieve. Maybe the author is just ignorant. Based on the rest of the article I'd say that is more than likely.

The most egregious error is to say tht Roh in the best chance for peace in the Korean peninsula. His election scares the bejeezzus out of me. Im sure that if war comes again to Korea, it will be because of the massive miscalculation of this Korean Chamberlain.

He is dangerously misguided, naive, and inexperienced.

Watch out!
25 posted on 02/25/2003 3:51:54 PM PST by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
Actually you are not correct. As of the last revison to the SOFA here in Korea, the Koreans basically have the same deal as the Germans.

Off post crimes are the jurisdicition of the local authorities. I beleive that custody of accused is with US, but tha is just to proect everyone, the local courts have jusrisdiction.

Now, EXCEPT when the act occured in the performance of the soldier's duties. And that is also the case for the ROK military forces also. And that's what happened in the case of the road accidnet wher two girls were run over by a tracked vehicle.

26 posted on 02/25/2003 3:59:54 PM PST by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
They have a legitimate beef over this. The process needs to be improved....
27 posted on 02/25/2003 4:04:36 PM PST by fooman (PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Thank you for the clarification; I was'nt aware that the situation had changed. Is it still the same UCMJ/Court Martial deal in Okinawa that it has been, or did that recently change too?

And yes, the accident with the two Korean girls was determined to be a "performance of duty" accident--If you know, what is the authority that determines if there is an accident or otherwise? Do any RoK authorities take part in that process?
28 posted on 02/25/2003 4:07:11 PM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jimt
That's why I suggested a national referendum. If the split is 60 for us staying and 40 for us leaving, then fine, let's stay. If most of the Koreans understand why we are there, than that makes a statement that a military ally's population has grip on reality and has enough in common with us to make that nation worth fighting for.

If they are starting to beleive the Bovine Scat about "our efforts to keep two Koreas" and resent us for the propaganda being hurled at them from the north, why would be interested in paying a price in blood (potentially) by shielding dumb/crazy people preparing themselves to sign onto a suicide pact?
29 posted on 02/25/2003 4:17:56 PM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fooman
See post #26; apparently my information is out of date and you all can stop praying to me on Sundays. ;-)

And yes, it was a legitimate beef which (as usual) we have corrected without a lot of fanfare. Something about this country that leads us to do the decent thing eventually with a lot of coercion. Funny thing, that.
30 posted on 02/25/2003 4:21:14 PM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I really don't know about Jaapan and Okinawa, but the Korean SOFA was renegotaited about a year ago, and all the South Korean concerns were addressed at that time. I was told (but I don't know enough about the German SOFA to know first-hand) that the Korean SOFA had been generally brought into alignment with the European SOFAs. There are almost certainly some local idiosyncracies, but the Korean concerns had primarily to do with legal jurisdiction over cromes, and I beleve it was that part of the SOFA that was harmonized to the satisfaction of the Koreans.

As for the road accident. There is no question about the facts, the accident took place while on official maneuvers.

As far as I know, the official position of the Korean government was to follow the SOFA. There was a lot of rabble rousing about GI "murderers" and "animals" walking free, but that was not the ROK government. It was left wing stirrers and the ususal off-base college students.

I am sure that there is a method whereby the Joint Forces Command reviews these cases. But I am equally sure that when it is an on-duty incident the matter is handled within the JF command, but not with ROK civilian authorities. It would be the same in the case of an accident involving ROK troops and civilians.

No military command anywhere in the world will accept civilian authority over its members while carrying out official duties.
31 posted on 02/25/2003 6:42:02 PM PST by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I sure wish that the posting engine had a spell checker built in. Even proof reasing doesn't seem to help me find all my big-fingered typos....
32 posted on 02/25/2003 6:43:34 PM PST by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Kim Dae-jung's Nobel Peace Prize is a tough act to follow.

Puh-leeeze. All Roh has to do is go out and buy his own.

33 posted on 02/25/2003 6:46:12 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
>>>>>No military command anywhere in the world will accept civilian authority over its members while carrying out official duties.<<<<<<

Oh, I know that. Its good that the JFC is involved though.

Stay Safe John.
34 posted on 02/26/2003 6:24:37 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Someone should tell South Korea how wonderfully reunification worked for the Germans...especially the (former) West Germans who have to pay a 'solidarity contribution' to rebuild (former) East Germany and which has crippled the German economy.
35 posted on 02/26/2003 6:28:29 AM PST by rightisright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: versus; dighton; aculeus; L,TOWM; general_re; Poohbah

VARMINT CONG ALERT!!!
Yellow-Bellied Clinton C**ksucker subspecies.
39 posted on 03/05/2003 5:10:47 AM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: versus; dighton; aculeus; general_re; L,TOWM
"i am still missing the Clinton's administration. Only Bush and Donald Lumspeld(spelled right?)are making troubles. "

ZOT bait?

40 posted on 03/05/2003 5:15:49 AM PST by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson