Posted on 02/25/2003 8:13:03 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
Microsoft eases switch to XP
CNET News.com
February 25, 2003, 4:57 AM PT
URL: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-985825.html
Microsoft, hoping to drive greater adoption of its Windows XP operating system, will on Tuesday unveil a new central Web site with revamped tools to help IT administrators make the switch.
The new Desktop Center site includes an updated version of the Windows XP Application Compatibility Toolkit, a set of tools Microsoft devised to assess whether current applications of businesses will work under Windows XP Professional, Microsoft's latest operating system for corporate customers.
Rogers Weed, corporate vice president of Windows product management at Microsoft, said the tool usually helps IT administrators determine that they need to make minimal changes to their existing software roster to run XP.
"A lot of people don't realize that XP is significantly more compatible (with existing applications)," Weed said. "In general, organizations will find 95 percent or more of their apps are fine."
The Desktop Center site also has multiple tools for dealing with the 5 percent of applications that don't make the cut. "We find there are some generic fixes that can address a broad class of the problems we see, and there are tools in the kit to help apply those," Weed said.
Paul DeGroot, an analyst for research firm Directions on Microsoft, said software compatibility has been a minor issue in the tepid pace of corporate adoption of Windows XP.
"XP runs a lot of stuff that Windows 2000 didn't," he said. "There are particular applications you come across where compatibility is an issue, but I don't think it's a show-stopper for Windows XP."
Hardware compatibility has been much more of a factor, DeGroot said. Windows XP requires significantly more memory and other resources than Windows 2000, and many businesses are trying to stretch PC upgrades they made three years ago in anticipation of Y2K. "Large customers hate to go and shake things up on the desktop," he said. "If people are working fine with Windows 2000, they're going to leave them be," said DeGroot.
The Desktop Center site also includes a new version of Microsoft's Baseline Security Analyzer, a tool that checks corporate desktops for the presence of current software updates and patches and for configuration errors that could pose risks.
"We keep investing in tools and information to help customers with deployment," Weed said. "We feel really good about the business case for upgrading to Windows XP, and we want to give customers tools that help them see those advantages."
We run heavy duty engineering software all the time without reformatting or other heroic measures - on NT 4.0.
If you don't need USB or InfraRed, you can get a lot better performance without all the BS.
NT 4.0 was designed to run on 486's with 16 MB of memory. On our late model equipment it rocks.
I bought it for those reasons, too, plus the warranty and in-home service.
But I have some old-fashioned ideas, one of which is that when I pay for something it is my absolute property.
When I buy a car, for example, that does not give the dealer the right to stop at the house every night and rummage through the trunk.
And that is essentially what some of these "Helpful" programs, like support.exe do, not to mention some of the things lurking in XP.
Dell made a decision, not to offer any other OS options. I respect that decision, just as I am sure they respect mine not to repeat the mistake. OK, maybe it is just my quirks, but on a broadband connection I pay for it is going to be all MY traffic, or traffic with my permission only. No going through my dumpster, reading over my shoulder, or otherwise "Phoning Home".
I feel it is like trespassing on property, or breaking and entering, and unlike real-world situations, I cannot shoot someone dead for doing it through my cable connection, but I sure would like to.
Well, I may as well fess up:
I REMOVED THE TAG FROM MY MATTRESS, TOO! :-)
Anything I do to activate that agreement, such as opening a package, etc, I am certain I did under a condition of Diminished Capacity. Because a person who feels as I do about ownership and control of private property obviously would agree to no such thing unless they were drunk or huffing ether. I do not care how many erotic fantasies MS and others have about "rented" software, I flatly refuse to accept the concept because it is absurd. If I pay $250 for Win2000, if I feel like decompiling it, or using the CD as an ashtray, I shall. *IF* if did not really own it, then it makes sense for me to pay a monthly bill and pay fifty cents for the CD. They are not going to have it both ways, at least here. Not while I have a network of a half dozen happy machines running 98SE.
Oh, BTW, Yes, the first thing I did when I got the machine was to neuter and gut it pretty thoroughly. An old rule of mine from DOS (TSR's)days is "Nothing runs unless I tell it to." Amazing how well machines will run on W98 if that rule is followed.
But so far the Linux people have not converted me, either, though I am weakening.
Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep! HIFI broadband feed HERE! (when available)
Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Click HERE!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.