[Exit148]

I like Sean. He's well informed, can be friendly, but can be like a pit bull when he's challenged. BUT -- he doesn't have the depth that Rush has. Rush can still take a situation and see it from a different angle than anyone. Sean doesn't do that. He deals with facts as presented. IMMHO

They are different, and there's room for both.

[Hotdog]

You hit the nail on the head....room for all who think like true God loving Americans!

[Captainpaintball]

I like Sean. He's well informed, can be friendly, but can be like a pit bull when he's challenged. BUT -- he doesn't have the depth that Rush has. Rush can still take a situation and see it from a different angle than anyone. Sean doesn't do that. He deals with facts as presented. IMMHO

The thing about Rush thatscares the hell out of Democrats is that he not only comes up with these angles on his own, he sees things no one else sees. (Michael Savage does, too, in a "big picture" sense.) He OWNS liberal Democrats. He knows what they are thinking, he knows their, next move, and he knows the motivations behind their actions. The truly possesses "Talent on loan..From God-duh!"