Posted on 02/21/2003 9:36:25 AM PST by PhiKapMom
An Open Letter to Democrats at the DNC Winter Meeting from RNC Chairman Marc Racicot
February 21, 2003
In the 2002 elections, the American people told both parties they wanted solutions, not finger pointing. They rejected criticism without solutions. When Democratic leaders said no to presenting a budget, to a Department of Homeland Security, to terrorism insurance and to judicial appointments, the American people said no to Democratic candidates.
Election day polls showed Republicans with double-digit leads over Democrats on who the American people trusted on homeland security, keeping America safer, and having clear ideas.
On the most dominant issue for voters, the economy, Republicans held a seven-point advantage on election day. But, success is rooted in more than just positive policies. It was clear on election day that the President provided the necessary leadership. Americans continue to see the President as a strong leader today with 64% saying the President works well with both parties, 86% believe he is willing to make hard decisions, 76% believe he is a strong and decisive leader, 70% believe he is honest and trustworthy.
After every election political parties have the opportunity to listen to the American people and adjust accordingly. Without compromising our core values, both parties must outline our policies in a way that reflects the American peoples voice. It is a process of adjustment and renewal that gives life and endurance to our democracy.
Some Democrats argue that in 2002 the problem wasnt their message, but that they couldnt or didnt get that message out. From complaining about a conservative media to decrying turnout tactics, these Democrats would rather blame someone else. Yet election day polls consistently showed that the public did hear, and in nearly every case reject, the Democrats message. The problem was the message was almost completely negative - from dealing with the economy and Social Security to a variety of other issues. The Democrats thought the best message was to just attack without offering a real alternative.
Despite the American peoples clear verdict, recent hyperbole by Democrat party leaders and Presidential candidates suggests that too many Democrats still dont get it. Democrats assail the President on everything, including the war on terrorism going so far as to allege that the one person who is most responsible for the safety and security of all Americans, the Commander-in-Chief, has underfunded the war on terrorism.
Thats not only wrong, which is bad enough, it should be counterintuitive given the Democrats' unsuccessful efforts to politicize homeland security in 2002.
Healthy political debate should be unabridged and vigorous, but must also be honest and responsible. Its purpose must be to advance and improve the political life of the nation. Suggestions that Republicans have turned a blind eye to the war on terrorism are not only spurious, they fail to advance the debate or allay the anxieties we face as Americans. Ultimately, scathing rhetoric as pure political theater becomes transparent and those who rely on it are identified only by their naked ambition or opportunism.
Honest political debate is designed to distinguish the differences in governing philosophies represented by political parties. Then the people of this nation can either identify with or legitimately disagree with those philosophies. It is a process that makes America stronger.
The performance and leadership of the President of the United States is always subject to review and comment, but the Democratic presidential candidates should not confuse inaccurate and opportunistic attacks on America's leader with real policy disagreements.
Its hard to unify around a positive agenda when you lack the White House or majorities in either house in Congress or a majority of state houses. It is even tougher when a large number of senior party officials are competing for their partys presidential nomination.
Democrats should use the opportunity at their National Committee meeting this week to do a little soul-searching to determine if they are capable of articulating a positive agenda that will advance the debate between our parties -- not just to say no. Jockeying Democratic presidential candidates and other Democratic Party leaders would be well-served to remember the words of an old Democratic governor who once told me that "good policy makes good politics."
Thank the good Lord in Heaven your nerves can be grated.
Proves you're not just *feeling*.
...but thinking.
I don't want to just win elections I want them discredited and destroyed so that we can take the country even further right. Any of you who are familiar with just the speech by JFK on why he wanted to lower taxes will understand that even the dims were once more right than anyone in office today.
WRONG!
America heard their message loud & clear and REJECTED it!
Heartily agree. Like a pig in slop, Terrence F. McAuliffe is in his element. Racicot is throwing pearls before swine if one is to believe this was intended for DNC consumption. However, it does give us in flyover country some ammunition for plinkin'.
Which brings me to another point that bothers me to no end. That is, the Dims will throw out a bald-faced lie, maybe even backed up with, "made from whole cloth" statistics, right on national teevee, in front of God and everybody. That's a given, but the problem is that even the best of interviewers, say a Britt Hume for example, cannot effectively counter the distortion(lie) because of the inherent inability to immediately access information that could expose the lie. The lie, if it is to be exposed at all, may take hours if not days to explore and research; by then the interviewee has moved on to other venues and more distortions; the damage is done. The Dims know this and use it to their advantage; over and over and over...
TMac will skate. He can count on Ashcroft having bigger fish to fry for the forseeable future ; )
FGS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.