Skip to comments.
How the New York Times Blew Its Biggest Story
WorldNetDaily ^
| 2/15/2003
| Jack Cashill
Posted on 02/21/2003 1:28:13 AM PST by Swordmaker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: eno_
Would this rule out Mistral as a potential source? (Mistral=Tungsten pellets)
To: shamusotoole
As far as can be determined from non-classified sources, tungsten and other simple, tough, heavy stuff is the material of choice for shrapnel in warheads. IF (and that is stilla big IF) this stuff came from a missile, it probably did not come from a warhead. I'd be thinking about the joints that hold the vanes that steer the missile, or something along those lines.
42
posted on
02/24/2003 10:19:48 AM PST
by
eno_
To: faithincowboys
We must understand - when all of this was going on - x42 was more interested in RETAINING HIS POWER than he was in protecting America.
I dare say - we are seeing the exact same attitude from the democrats today.
43
posted on
02/24/2003 10:26:22 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
( Yo! Syracuse)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson