Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some voice concern over president's religious rhetoric
Boston Globe ^ | February 16, 2003 | John Donnelly

Posted on 02/16/2003 2:16:43 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last
To: KDD
"Deists did not believe in the virgin birth, divinity, or resurrection of Jesus, the efficacy of prayer, the miracles of the Bible, or even the divine inspiration of the Bible."

I skimmed your idiotic reply and missed the above. How silly. Deists believe IN ALL that except miracles which is silly since the DO believe in a Supreme Being. Maybe you should stop coping website, trying to steal credit for stupidity and start THINKING for a change.

81 posted on 02/16/2003 11:38:43 AM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You got that right! And anytime someone hits their thumb with a hammer and shouts "Jesus!", we need to have liberal minders there to cane the offending person!
82 posted on 02/16/2003 11:39:53 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KDD
P-Marlowe...Christian Taliban.

Talk about nullifying your credibility! I was willing to give you a pass for an accidental shot in the foot, but now you are observed carefully squeezing off 6 more aimed shots into the same appendage!

83 posted on 02/16/2003 11:42:45 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
First of all I have not now nor have I ever asserted that the Constitution is anything other than a secular document. That does not mean, however, that the document was not significantly influenced by the religious viewpoints of the Founding Fathers.

Which as I pointed out were varied, with many of the participants leaning toward deism and other beliefs.

If you read the History of the constitutional convention you will find that the convention was on the verge of collapse until George Washington(a deist) decided that they needed the assistance of God Almighty in drafting a document that all of the competing factions could agree upon. Thus George Washington instuted opening and closing prayers on the proceedings -- a practice that continues in our congress to this day.

Once again God...not Jesus. Was this country founded as a Godly country...perhaps, but a Christian Nation? I don't think so.

It was only after the prayers to the Almighty were invoked that the convention proceeded forward and the document we have as our constitution was agreed upon Unanimously.

There were no "praise Jesus" uttered in the chamber afterward.
Or none recorded in history books.

It is either a huge coincidence that the parties only got together AFTER the assistance of the Almighty was requested or it is a result of the intervention of the Almighty that the Constitution was completed.

Despite the admitted efforts of all of the participants to keep the Document from becoming a "Christian" document, the words the year of OUR Lord were placed in and ratified. They could have put the more common term the "year of THE Lord" or the term Anno Domini or left it out altogether. They didn't. The reference is personal and is a direct reference to Jesus Christ as Lord. Thus your assertion that there were no references to "Christianity" in the constitution was incorrect.

As I pointed out in the above excerpt,..."Some Christians were of course involved in the shaping of our nation, but their influence was minor compared to the ideological contributions of the Deists who pressed for the formation of a secular nation." This entry may have been a concession to the "Christian faction", but that brings up this point..."no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." (excerpt)"Now if the delegates at the convention had truly intended to establish a "Christian nation," why would they have put a statement like this in the constitution and nowhere else even refer to religion? Common sense is enough to convince any reasonable person that if the intention of these men had really been the formation of a "Christian nation," the constitution they wrote would have surely made several references to God, the Bible, Jesus, and other accouterments of the Christian religion, and rather than expressly forbidding ANY religious test as a condition for holding public office in the new nation, it would have stipulated that allegiance to Christianity was a requirement for public office".

84 posted on 02/16/2003 11:57:52 AM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Your opinion is of little value to me.
85 posted on 02/16/2003 11:58:49 AM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: snooter55
Well I'm sure KDD is convinced now. (/sarcasm)
86 posted on 02/16/2003 12:04:53 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: snooter55
"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."
Albert Einstein

Jesus is Gods son snooter, as are you.

Gotta go now. Got a vanload of senior citizens at Manor Care waiting for me to take them to church.

87 posted on 02/16/2003 12:10:14 PM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: KDD
that brings up this point..."no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." (excerpt)"Now if the delegates at the convention had truly intended to establish a "Christian nation," why would they have put a statement like this in the constitution and nowhere else even refer to religion?

Because they all recognized that the European model of marriage of the state to particular sects or religions was a disaster. That is why the ancestors of our Founding Fathers came to the Colonies.. in order to escape State imposed religious persecution. It was not that the Founding Fathers did not wish to acknowledge the Hand of God upon this Nation, indeed they acknowledged it on a regular basis. They simply did not wish for the Federal Government to dictate the religious qualifications for its leaders or its citizens. Something that many of the Left and many of the so called religiously tolerant and those who claim to advocate separation of chruch and state cannot understand.

Those who scream that George Bush should tone down his religious rhetoric are the ones who are actually calling for a "religious test" for office. Those Senators who would deny a judgeship to a Religious Catholic because religious catholics might be against abortion are those who violate this section of the constitution.

The constitution does not forbid any Federal or State Official from proclaiming his own religious beliefs from the halls of congress to the classrooms of our public schools. Indeed, it guarantees that right.

88 posted on 02/16/2003 12:25:16 PM PST by P-Marlowe (In the year of "OUR LORD"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Historians, who deal with facts rather than wishes,

I'm an amature (wannabe) historian. I would be one by profession if I had not had to get a job to support my family immediately after college. My history degree opened enough doors so that I ended up with a great job, but my intent had always been grad school and a Phd.

I have studied history my entire life, and I assure you that many, if not most, modern historians deal with their "wishes" rather than the "facts" all the time.

Our founding fathers established a religiously neutral nation,

That isn't the point. You stated that the Founding Fathers were Deists. I correctly replied that some were and some were not.

Separation of church and state is what the founding fathers wanted for the nation,

You cannot back that up with historical fact.

we must never allow anyone to distort history to make it appear otherwise.

History is distorted every day. The trick is to have enough historical knowledge to see the counterfeit "history" that, say, the ACLU and People for the American Way are trying to shove down our throats.

89 posted on 02/16/2003 12:46:02 PM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Satan, knows that Jesus is the Son of God. That's why he trembles at the mention of His name. Your anwser implies that you DON'T believe Jesus is Lord, hence, you are unsaved. If you feel the need to add anything to your reply, please do so that we can go from there. Otherwise, my prayer is that The Holy Spirit will lead you to the Truth ... and that you accept it.
Oh, BTW, I didn't ask you what A.Einstein thought. If his beliefs didn't change before he left this life, I pity him. You, however, still live and have an opportunity to change your eternity. I'm just wanting to be helpful my friend.
Snooter ;o)
90 posted on 02/16/2003 1:10:30 PM PST by snooter55 (In trying times, don't quit trying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Christophobes would include; the ACLU, the UN, Dept. Of Education, Janet Reno, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barney Frank and Peter Jennings. Usage: After reading the public version of the Project Meggido report, I am completely convinced it must have been authored or contributed to by Christophobes.

I thought God reserved the judging of men's hearts for himself.

91 posted on 02/16/2003 1:25:42 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: KDD
"The primary leaders of the so-called founding fathers of our nation were not Bible-believing Christians; they were deists. Deism was a philosophical belief that was widely accepted by the colonial intelligentsia at the time of the American Revolution. Its major tenets included belief in human reason as a reliable means of solving social and political problems and belief in a supreme deity who created the universe to operate solely by natural laws. The supreme God of the Deists removed himself entirely from the universe after creating it. They believed that he assumed no control over it, exerted no influence on natural phenomena, and gave no supernatural revelation to man. A necessary consequence of these beliefs was a rejection of many doctrines central to the Christian religion. Deists did not believe in the virgin birth, divinity, or resurrection of Jesus, the efficacy of prayer, the miracles of the Bible, or even the divine inspiration of the Bible. "
__________________________________________________________________________________

What unadulterated bull hockey! As I just posted in another thread, deism never really caught on in America. It was fleetingly embraced only by a handful of non-founders during a very brief period in the 19th century. Jefferson, when accused of being a deist, hotly and indignantly denied it. And although Franklin's youthful flirtation with deism is well-known, his later repudiation of it is also no secret. Deists, as you know, don't believe in providence (divine intervention) and therefore don't believe in the utility of prayer. They also do not appeal to scriptural authority. Note Ben Franklin's speech to the Constitutional Convention, which follows --

    "The small progress we have made after four or five weeks' close attendance and continual reasonings with each other--our different sentiments on almost every question, several of the last producing as many noes as ayes--is, methinks, a melancholy proof of the imperfection of the human understanding. We indeed seem to feel our own want of political wisdom, since we have been running about in search of it. We have gone back to ancient history for models of government, and examined the different forms of those republics which, having been formed with the seeds of their own dissolution, now no longer exist. And we have viewed modern states all round Europe, but find none of their constitutions suitable to our circumstances.

    "In this situation of this assembly, groping, as it were, in the dark, to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish it when presented to us, how has it happened, sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of lights to illuminate our understandings. In the beginning of the contest with Great Britain, when we were sensible of dangers, we had daily prayer in this room for the divine protection. Our prayers, sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a superintending Providence in our favor. To that kind Providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful Friend? Or do we imagine that we no longer need his assistance?

    "I have lived, sir, a long time, and, the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth--that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured, sir, in the sacred writings, that 'Except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it.'

    "I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall succeed, in this political building, no better than the builders of Babel. We shall be divided by our little partial local interests; our projects will be confounded; and we ourselves shall become a reproach and by-word down to future ages. And, what is worse, mankind may hereafter, from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing governments by human wisdom, and leave it to chance, war, and conquest.

    "I therefore beg leave to move that, henceforth, prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations, be held in this assembly every morning before we proceed to business, and that one or more of the clergy of this city be requested to officiate in that service."

Sound like a "deist" to you? In just this one citation, we see Franklin referring repeatedly to divine intervention, calling for prayer and citing scriptural authority. Of the 55 men at the Constitutional Convention, a typical account of their faiths will show 28 Episcopalian (Anglican), 8 Presbyterian, 7 Congregationalist, 2 Dutch Reformed, 2 Lutheran, 2 Roman Catholic, etc. There was hardly a "deist" to be found among them, so your argument that the "primary" founders were "deists" is absurd. Did you know that in some states in 1789, you couldn't even hold public office if you were a deist? As early as the Great Awakening of the 1740s, deism was a distrusted and discredited relic of the French enlightenment, and as late as 1828, Noah Webster's definition of "deism" left no doubt about this.

92 posted on 02/16/2003 1:54:07 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"KDD....Plagerist and Atheist. "

See post 92.

93 posted on 02/16/2003 1:56:55 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The PC crowd gets more and more disgusting, and totally out of control. How dare they question our President invoking God in his speeches!!!!! Their former president Bubba carried an oversized Bible all over and spoke about his supposed faith all of the time for effect. That was okay of course.
Sheesh!
94 posted on 02/16/2003 2:01:44 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KDD
Ahhh! A subject of mutual agreement! I see I join a large contingent of like-minded Freepers! Your opinion is of even less value to me, except that it does lower the bar even more than I thought possible.

Revel in your achievement, Sir!

95 posted on 02/16/2003 2:33:41 PM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: KDD; P-Marlowe
Here is an excerpt from a letter written by Jefferson to Charles Thompson, January 9, 1816 --

    "...I, too, have made a wee-little book from the same materials, which I call the Philosophy of Jesus; it is a paradigma of his doctrines, made by cutting the texts out of the book, and arranging them on the pages of a blank book, in a certain order of time or subject. A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus, very different from the Platonists, who call me infidel and themselves Christians and preachers of the gospel, while they draw all their characteristic dogmas from what its author never said nor saw. They have compounded from the heathen mysteries a system beyond the comprehension of man, of which the great reformer of the vicious ethics and deism of the Jews, were he to return on earth, would not recognize one feature."

This, obviously, was not written by deist.
96 posted on 02/16/2003 2:38:02 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Bumper Sticker:

"Jesus is coming -- everyone look busy!"
97 posted on 02/16/2003 2:39:21 PM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Post #92 = Checkmate
98 posted on 02/16/2003 5:24:35 PM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: KDD; P-Marlowe; RnMomof7
brown=KDD

green=P-Marlowe

If you read the History of the constitutional convention you will find that the convention was on the verge of collapse until George Washington(a deist) decided that they needed the assistance of God Almighty in drafting a document that all of the competing factions could agree upon. Thus George Washington instuted opening and closing prayers on the proceedings -- a practice that continues in our congress to this day.

In point of fact, Washington was an Episcopalian and a Calvinist. You really should check your facts before you post.

99 posted on 02/16/2003 5:34:50 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Where are those "golden plates" by the way?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: KDD
"I laugh. My God weeps."

We should all be praying for the souls of not only our nation, but the world.

Pre-war is not the time for any of us to be cocky.

As Christians we should mourn for those that we cannot reach and for those who we fail to try to reach.

God bless President Bush for realizing that he is not the One in power. Thank God that the one who thought he was in power is out of office.

My prayers will go out for all of you regardless of faith. For those who don't believe the way that I do, thank you for letting me prayer for you tonight.

100 posted on 02/16/2003 9:23:29 PM PST by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson